• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学生与护理专业人员在学习与创新网络中所经历的紧张关系:一项运用叙事法的回应性评估

Tensions experienced by student and care professionals in a learning and innovation network: a responsive evaluation using storytelling.

作者信息

Albers M Marjolein, Gobbens R J J Robbert, Reitsma M Margreet, Nies H L G R Henk, Timmermans O A A M J Olaf

机构信息

Faculty of Health, Sports and Social Work, Inholland University of Apllied Sciences, De Boelelaan 1109 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Organization Sciences, Faculty Social Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1105 1081, HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 May 29;9:100360. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100360. eCollection 2025 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100360
PMID:40535455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12173126/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Learning and innovation networks are collaborative initiatives between educational and healthcare institutions aimed at integrating the learning of students and care professionals and improving the quality of care through shared practices.

AIM

This study aims to explore how care professionals and students experience learning and working within a learning and innovation network.

METHODS

Using a responsive evaluation, we collected data in four iterative phases: (1) interviews with four students and two care professionals to identify themes; (2) development of four fictional stories illustrating tensions based on interview data and practical experience; (3) focus groups with students and care professionals to validate and refine the stories; and (4) a mixed stakeholder group discussion to reflect and start to formulate improvement actions. Thematic analysis was used across all phases.

RESULTS

Participants experienced various tensions, and one of the primary challenges for both students and care professionals was to balance the time allocated between learning activities, care provision and innovation projects. Students faced role ambiguity when performing unsupervised care tasks, feeling part of the team but also vulnerable in their learner status. Care professionals struggled with time constraints and competing demands between patient care and student supervision, which sometimes led to them withdrawing from guiding students. Another tension emerged around engaging in quality improvement. While participants recognized the importance of improving care, engaging in this progress was hindered by a lack of shared understanding of optimal rehabilitation practices and unclear responsibilities regarding implementing innovation. The student-dense environment, though rich in learning potential, heightened these tensions due to differing expectations and unclear roles.

CONCLUSION

Although learning and innovation networks offer valuable opportunities for mutual learning and improving care, they also introduce tensions that need to be acknowledged and addressed. Managing these tensions, especially around time division, role clarity and a shared vision for improving care, is essential for creating sustainable learning and innovation climates in practice.

摘要

背景

学习与创新网络是教育机构和医疗机构之间的合作项目,旨在整合学生和护理专业人员的学习,并通过共享实践提高护理质量。

目的

本研究旨在探讨护理专业人员和学生在学习与创新网络中的学习和工作体验。

方法

我们采用响应式评估,分四个迭代阶段收集数据:(1)对四名学生和两名护理专业人员进行访谈以确定主题;(2)根据访谈数据和实践经验编写四个说明紧张关系的虚构故事;(3)与学生和护理专业人员进行焦点小组讨论以验证和完善这些故事;(4)进行一次混合利益相关者小组讨论以反思并开始制定改进措施。所有阶段均采用主题分析法。

结果

参与者经历了各种紧张关系,学生和护理专业人员面临的主要挑战之一是平衡学习活动、护理提供和创新项目之间的时间分配。学生在执行无人监督的护理任务时面临角色模糊的问题,感觉自己是团队的一员,但作为学习者又很脆弱。护理专业人员在时间限制以及患者护理和学生监督之间的相互竞争需求方面苦苦挣扎,这有时导致他们不再指导学生。在参与质量改进方面出现了另一种紧张关系。虽然参与者认识到改善护理的重要性,但由于对最佳康复实践缺乏共同理解以及在实施创新方面责任不明确,参与这一过程受到了阻碍。学生密集的环境虽然具有丰富的学习潜力,但由于期望不同和角色不明确,加剧了这些紧张关系。

结论

尽管学习与创新网络为相互学习和改善护理提供了宝贵机会,但它们也带来了需要认识和解决的紧张关系。管理这些紧张关系,尤其是在时间分配、角色明确和改善护理的共同愿景方面,对于在实践中营造可持续的学习和创新氛围至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c7/12173126/fb86330c5949/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c7/12173126/fb86330c5949/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22c7/12173126/fb86330c5949/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Tensions experienced by student and care professionals in a learning and innovation network: a responsive evaluation using storytelling.学生与护理专业人员在学习与创新网络中所经历的紧张关系:一项运用叙事法的回应性评估
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 May 29;9:100360. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100360. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
4
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.最重要的是什么?通过自闭症青少年和成年人的日常经历探索生活质量。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
A qualitative interview study exploring patients' views and experiences of treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the UK.一项定性访谈研究,探讨英国化脓性汗腺炎患者对治疗的看法和经历。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):85-92. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf046.
8
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
"We're all in it together": uniting a diverse range of professionals and people with lived experience within the development of a complex, theory-based paediatric speech and language therapy intervention.“我们同舟共济”:在一项基于理论的复杂儿科言语和语言治疗干预措施的开发过程中,团结各类专业人员以及有实际经验的人士。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 19;11(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00738-8.
10
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Developing a theory of change model for a learning and innovation network: A qualitative study.开发学习和创新网络的变革理论模型:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2024 May;77:103954. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103954. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
2
The Role of Nursing Staff Regarding Goal Setting and Achieving in Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Focus Group Study.护理人员在老年康复中的目标设定和实现中的作用:一项焦点小组研究。
Rehabil Nurs. 2023;48(5):148-159. doi: 10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000429. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
3
A Qualitative Study Exploring Professional Perspectives of a Challenging Rehabilitation Environment for Geriatric Rehabilitation.
一项探索老年康复挑战性康复环境专业观点的定性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Feb 3;12(3):1231. doi: 10.3390/jcm12031231.
4
Responsive evaluation: an innovative evaluation methodology for workplace health promotion interventions.响应式评价:工作场所健康促进干预的创新评价方法。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 22;12(12):e062320. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062320.
5
What can healthcare systems learn from looking at tensions in innovation processes? A systematic literature review.从创新过程中的紧张关系中,医疗保健系统可以学到什么?一项系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 28;22(1):1299. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08626-7.
6
Exploring crucial programme characteristics and group mechanisms of an empowerment programme for certified nursing assistants-A qualitative study.探讨认证护士助理赋能计划的关键计划特征和团体机制:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Sep;78(9):2949-2959. doi: 10.1111/jan.15259. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
7
The Learning Environment of Student Nurses During Clinical Placement: A Qualitative Case Study of a Student-Dense Ward.临床实习期间实习护士的学习环境:一个学生密集型病房的定性案例研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2021 Oct 27;7:23779608211052357. doi: 10.1177/23779608211052357. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Learning and innovation network in nursing: A concept analysis.护理学习与创新网络:概念分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Sep;104:104988. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104988. Epub 2021 May 29.
9
Implementing dedicated nursing clinical education unit: Nursing students' and preceptors' perspectives.实施专门的护理临床教育单元:护理学生和导师的观点。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;37(3):673-681. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
10
The Impact of Dedicated Education Model on Nursing Students' Outcomes: An Integrative Review.专科教育模式对护生学习成果的影响:综合评价。
Nurse Educ. 2021;46(5):E113-E116. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001022.