• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗护士的护理差错:一项混合研究。

Nursing Errors in Iranian Nurses: A Mixed Study.

作者信息

Nematollahi Monirsadat, Bagherian Behnaz, Mehdipour-Rabori Roghayeh

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Nursing School of Nursing and Midwifery, Reproductive and Family Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman Iran.

Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing Nursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman Iran.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 18;8(6):e70904. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70904. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1002/hsr2.70904
PMID:40535525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12174656/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Medical errors that result in patient injuries and fatalities are a significant concern in healthcare. Understanding these errors and their contributing factors is essential for enhancing the quality of patient care. This study aimed to investigate nursing errors and the factors that influence them.

METHODS

This study employed a mixed-method approach with a sequential explanatory design and was conducted in Iran from 2022 to 2023. The study consisted of two phases. In the quantitative phase, a cross-sectional study was conducted in which 200 nurses in Kerman City completed two questionnaires: one on nursing errors and the other on factors influencing nursing errors. In the qualitative phase, the researchers conducted semi-structured, in-depth, face-to-face individual interviews with 30 nurses.

RESULTS

Two hundred nurses took part in the quantitative phase, and 99% of them reported experiencing at least one nursing error. The highest average score for errors was associated with medication errors (3.40 ± 0.37), followed by care errors (2.85 ± 1.34). The average scores for the most prevalent causes of errors were highest in the organizational dimension (3.8 ± 1.01). A significant positive correlation was found between the average scores of various error dimensions and the average scores of different dimensions related to the causes of errors ( < 0.05). Three main categories were identified from the qualitative data: "Nursing errors must be reported," "Doom of conscience after committing a nursing error," and "Error in nursing is multifactorial."

CONCLUSION

The study revealed a high prevalence of nursing errors, emphasizing the need for proactive measures. Healthcare system managers and decision-makers must take into account the factors that contribute to nursing errors and respond appropriately to eliminate or reduce them.

摘要

背景与目的

导致患者受伤和死亡的医疗差错是医疗保健领域的一个重大问题。了解这些差错及其促成因素对于提高患者护理质量至关重要。本研究旨在调查护理差错及其影响因素。

方法

本研究采用混合方法,采用顺序解释性设计,于2022年至2023年在伊朗进行。该研究包括两个阶段。在定量阶段,进行了一项横断面研究,克尔曼市的200名护士完成了两份问卷:一份关于护理差错,另一份关于影响护理差错的因素。在定性阶段,研究人员对30名护士进行了半结构化、深入的面对面个人访谈。

结果

200名护士参与了定量阶段,其中99%的护士报告至少经历过一次护理差错。差错平均得分最高的是用药差错(3.40±0.37),其次是护理差错(2.85±1.34)。差错最普遍原因的平均得分在组织维度最高(3.8±1.01)。发现各种差错维度的平均得分与差错原因相关的不同维度的平均得分之间存在显著正相关(<0.05)。从定性数据中确定了三个主要类别:“护理差错必须报告”、“犯护理差错后的良心谴责”和“护理差错是多因素的”。

结论

该研究揭示了护理差错的高发生率,强调了采取积极措施的必要性。医疗保健系统管理人员和决策者必须考虑导致护理差错的因素,并做出适当反应以消除或减少这些因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9afe/12174656/f78d802440b3/HSR2-8-e70904-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9afe/12174656/f78d802440b3/HSR2-8-e70904-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9afe/12174656/f78d802440b3/HSR2-8-e70904-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Nursing Errors in Iranian Nurses: A Mixed Study.伊朗护士的护理差错:一项混合研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 18;8(6):e70904. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70904. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.最重要的是什么?通过自闭症青少年和成年人的日常经历探索生活质量。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
A qualitative interview study exploring patients' views and experiences of treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the UK.一项定性访谈研究,探讨英国化脓性汗腺炎患者对治疗的看法和经历。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):85-92. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf046.
4
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
6
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
7
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
8
Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.乳腺癌幸存者恢复工作的预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 May 7;5(5):CD015124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015124.pub2.
9
Absorbent products for moderate-heavy urinary and/or faecal incontinence in women and men.适用于女性和男性中重度尿失禁和/或大便失禁的吸收性产品。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8(4):CD007408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007408.
10
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical nurse competence and its effect on patient safety culture: a systematic review.临床护士能力及其对患者安全文化的影响:一项系统综述。
BMC Nurs. 2023 May 19;22(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01305-w.
2
Untenable Expectations: Nurses' Work in the Context of Medication Administration, Error, and the Organization.站不住脚的期望:护士在给药、差错及组织背景下的工作
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2022 Nov 13;9:23333936221131779. doi: 10.1177/23333936221131779. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Patient safety. Factors for and perceived consequences of nursing errors by nursing staff in home care services.
患者安全。家庭护理服务中护理人员护理错误的因素和感知后果。
Nurs Open. 2021 Mar;8(2):755-765. doi: 10.1002/nop2.678. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
4
Investigation of medical error-reporting system and reporting status in Iran in 2019.2019年伊朗医疗差错报告系统及报告状况调查。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Oct 30;9:272. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_73_20. eCollection 2020.
5
First, Do No Harm (Gone Wrong): Total-Scale Analysis of Medical Errors Scientific Literature.首先,切勿伤害(出了差错):医学差错科学文献的全面分析
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;8:558913. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.558913. eCollection 2020.
6
Incidence of Medication Error in Critical Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital: Where Do We Stand?三级医院重症监护病房用药错误的发生率:我们目前的状况如何?
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep;24(9):799-803. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23556.
7
Demystifying Content Analysis.内容分析法解析
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7113. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7113.
8
Prevalence of medical errors in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.伊朗医疗差错的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4464-8.
9
Ethical leadership, nursing error and error reporting from the nurses' perspective.伦理领导力、护理差错与护士差错报告视角
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Mar;27(2):609-620. doi: 10.1177/0969733019858706. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
Barriers to nurses reporting errors and adverse events.护士报告错误和不良事件的障碍。
Br J Nurs. 2019 Jun 13;28(11):690-695. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2019.28.11.690.