Gao Zhiqi, Lu Kuan, Yang Zugeng, Xing Liji, Xie Hong
Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou 215004, Jiangsu, PR China.
Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University Suzhou 215004, Jiangsu, PR China.
Am J Transl Res. 2025 May 15;17(5):3404-3412. doi: 10.62347/MPBV9850. eCollection 2025.
To evaluate the effects of lung ultrasound (LUS) in assessing pulmonary ventilation status in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
A total of 35 ARDS patients aged 29-93 years, admitted to the Anesthesiology Intensive Care Unit and scheduled for chest computed tomography (CT), were retrospectively analyzed. Prior to the CT scan, arterial blood gas samples were collected, and LUS scores were obtained using a Sonostar portable ultrasound device. Based on the Berlin definition, patients were categorized into mild ARDS and moderate-to-severe ARDS groups. Lung density, lung volume, proportions of lung volume in different ventilation states, and LUS scores were compared between the groups. Spearman correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between LUS scores and other parameters.
Lung density, LUS scores, and the proportion of collapsed lung volume were significantly higher in the moderate-to-severe ARDS group than those in the mild ARDS group (all P < 0.05). In patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, LUS scores showed a moderate correlation with the oxygenation index, lung density, and the proportion of collapsed lung volume. In mild ARDS patients, no significant correlation was observed between LUS scores and these parameters.
LUS is an effective, non-invasive tool for evaluating pulmonary ventilation status in ARDS patients and is particularly reliable in assessing ventilation status in those with moderate-to-severe ARDS.
评估肺部超声(LUS)在评估急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者肺通气状态中的作用。
回顾性分析35例年龄在29至93岁之间、入住麻醉重症监护病房且计划进行胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)的ARDS患者。在CT扫描前,采集动脉血气样本,并使用Sonostar便携式超声设备获得LUS评分。根据柏林定义,将患者分为轻度ARDS组和中重度ARDS组。比较两组之间的肺密度、肺容积、不同通气状态下的肺容积比例以及LUS评分。采用Spearman相关性分析评估LUS评分与其他参数之间的关系。
中重度ARDS组的肺密度、LUS评分和肺萎陷容积比例显著高于轻度ARDS组(均P < 0.05)。在中重度ARDS患者中,LUS评分与氧合指数、肺密度和肺萎陷容积比例呈中度相关。在轻度ARDS患者中,未观察到LUS评分与这些参数之间存在显著相关性。
LUS是评估ARDS患者肺通气状态的一种有效、非侵入性工具,在评估中重度ARDS患者的通气状态时尤其可靠。