Suppr超能文献

噪声与耳鸣风险:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究。

Noise and the risk of tinnitus: A two-sample Mendelian randomized study.

作者信息

Huang He-Sen, Chen Kai-Qin, Zhou Wen-Kao, Zhang Bin, Gao Jing, Xie Fei, Du Yu

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University Xiamen Fujian China.

Department of Neurosurgery Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University Xiamen Fujian China.

出版信息

World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Sep 23;11(2):189-197. doi: 10.1002/wjo2.211. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Observational studies imply that noise may increase the likelihood of developing tinnitus. However, no causal relationship has been established between the two using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, we aimed to determine the potential causal relationship between noise and various categories of tinnitus.

METHODS

We extracted single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with noise and tinnitus from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS) of European individuals. UK Biobank (UKB) provided summary data for both entities. Inverse variance weighting (IVW) was implemented as the primary method for evaluating effect estimates. Using Weighted median and MR-Egger regression, heterogeneity and pleiotropy were evaluated using sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The random-effects IVW approach revealed a causal relationship between noise and the three onset tinnitus (odds ratio [OR] = 1.052, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.013-1.092,  = 0.008; OR = 1.248, 95% CI = 1.177-1.323,  = 0.001; OR = 1.133, 95% CI = 1.058-1.213,  = 0.001). Noise was not a risk factor for tinnitus in the past (OR = 0.999, 95% CI = 0.934-1.068,  = 0.969). Validation with various Mendelian randomization methodologies and sensitivity analyses confirmed the findings' consistency.

CONCLUSION

This Mendelian Randomization study provides causal evidence that noise is a risk factor for the onset of tinnitus but is not a risk factor for developing tinnitus in the past.

摘要

目的

观察性研究表明,噪声可能会增加患耳鸣的可能性。然而,尚未通过孟德尔随机化(MR)分析确定两者之间的因果关系,我们旨在确定噪声与各类耳鸣之间的潜在因果关系。

方法

我们从一项针对欧洲个体的大型全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中提取了与噪声和耳鸣相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)。英国生物银行(UKB)提供了这两个实体的汇总数据。采用逆方差加权(IVW)作为评估效应估计值的主要方法。使用加权中位数和MR-Egger回归,通过敏感性分析评估异质性和多效性。

结果

随机效应IVW方法揭示了噪声与三种新发耳鸣之间的因果关系(优势比[OR]=1.052,95%置信区间[CI]=1.013-1.092,P=0.008;OR=1.248,95%CI=1.177-1.323,P=0.001;OR=1.133,95%CI=1.058-1.213,P=0.001)。噪声不是过去患耳鸣的危险因素(OR=0.999,95%CI=0.934-1.068,P=0.969)。使用各种孟德尔随机化方法进行验证和敏感性分析证实了研究结果的一致性。

结论

这项孟德尔随机化研究提供了因果证据,表明噪声是新发耳鸣的危险因素,但不是过去患耳鸣的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b4d/12172121/8e7c14533647/WJO2-11-189-g006.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验