• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Authors' response.

作者信息

Arunraj Manjula, Vijay Vaishnavi, Kumpatla Satyavani, Viswanathan Vijay

机构信息

1, Department of Psychology, Prof. M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India.

2, Department of Diabetology, Prof. M. Viswanathan Diabetes Research Centre, Chennai, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Res. 2025 Apr;161(4):431-432. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_1317_2025.

DOI:10.25259/IJMR_1317_2025
PMID:40536385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12178187/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Authors' response.作者回复。
Indian J Med Res. 2025 Apr;161(4):431-432. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_1317_2025.
2
Improved volumetric measurement of brain structure with a distortion correction procedure using an ADNI phantom.利用 ADNI 体模进行失真校正程序改善脑结构的容积测量。
Med Phys. 2013 Jun;40(6):062303. doi: 10.1118/1.4801913.
3
Association between competing interests and authors' conclusions: epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJ.利益冲突与作者结论之间的关联：对发表于《英国医学杂志》的随机临床试验的流行病学研究
BMJ. 2002 Aug 3;325(7358):249. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7358.249.
4
Believing in Expertise: How Authors' Credentials and Language Use Influence the Credibility of Online Health Information.相信专业知识：作者的资质与语言运用如何影响在线健康信息的可信度。
Health Commun. 2017 Jul;32(7):828-836. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1172296. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
5
Simultaneous segmentation and iterative registration method for computing ADC with reduced artifacts from DW-MRI.用于从扩散加权磁共振成像中计算具有减少伪影的表观扩散系数的同步分割和迭代配准方法。
Med Phys. 2015 May;42(5):2249-60. doi: 10.1118/1.4916799.
6
A productive clash of perspectives? The interplay between articles' and authors' perspectives and their impact on Wikipedia edits in a controversial domain.观点的有效碰撞？文章观点与作者观点之间的相互作用及其对有争议领域维基百科编辑的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12(6):e0178985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178985. eCollection 2017.
7
Suitability of h- and x-indices for evaluating authors' individual research achievements in a given short period of years: A bibliometric analysis.在给定的短时间内，h-和 x-指数用于评估作者个人研究成果的适宜性：一项文献计量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Mar 12;100(10):e25016. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025016.
8
Multi-GPU implementation of a VMAT treatment plan optimization algorithm.容积调强放疗（VMAT）治疗计划优化算法的多图形处理器（Multi-GPU）实现
Med Phys. 2015 Jun;42(6):2841-52. doi: 10.1118/1.4919742.
9
Funder and authors' financial conflicts of interest information in trial publications: adequacy of reporting and obtaining missing information.试验出版物中资助者和作者的利益冲突信息：报告的充分性及获取缺失信息的情况
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jun;182:111786. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111786. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
10
Quantifying continuous exercise using the ratio of work completed to endurance limit associated with exercise-induced delayed-onset muscle soreness.使用完成的工作量与运动诱发的延迟性肌肉酸痛相关的耐力极限之比来量化持续运动。
Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Feb;106(1):104-12. doi: 10.2466/pms.106.1.104-112.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of progressive muscle relaxation therapy on diabetes distress & anxiety among people with type 2 diabetes.渐进性肌肉松弛疗法对2型糖尿病患者糖尿病困扰及焦虑的影响。
Indian J Med Res. 2025 Jan;161(1):72-80. doi: 10.25259/IJMR_1227_2024.
2
Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: why monitoring matters.临床试验中的结果报告偏倚：为何监测至关重要。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 14;356:j408. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j408.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Estimating the Expected Dropout Rates in Randomized Controlled Trials on Yoga Interventions.一项系统评价与荟萃分析：估计瑜伽干预随机对照试验中的预期失访率
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2016;2016:5859729. doi: 10.1155/2016/5859729. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
Assessing bias: the importance of considering confounding.评估偏倚：考虑混杂因素的重要性。
Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012 Feb;3(1):9-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1298595.
5
Double-blindness protects scientific validity.双盲法可确保科学有效性。
J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Feb;6(2):230-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02836.x. Epub 2007 Nov 15.
6
Research fundamentals: follow-up of subjects in clinical trials: addressing subject attrition.研究基础：临床试验中受试者的随访：应对受试者流失
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Aug;11(8):859-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb00769.x.
7
The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: gold standard or golden calf?双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验：金标准还是金牛犊？
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Jun;54(6):541-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00347-4.