Suppr超能文献

大型胸腺瘤的机器人胸腺切除术:一项多中心研究。

Robotic thymectomy for large thymomas: a multicenter study.

作者信息

Nachira Dania, Congedo Maria Teresa, Bertolaccini Luca, Novellis Pierluigi, Bertoglio Pietro, De Palma Angela, Romano Rosalia, Raveglia Federico, Kuzmych Khrystyna, Senatore Alessia, Chiari Matteo, Maiorca Sebastiano, Scala Cinzia, Petroncini Matteo, Brascia Debora, Carleo Graziana, Spinelli Francesca, Petrella Francesco, Lococo Filippo, Gavezzoli Diego, Brandolini Jury, Marulli Giuseppe, Veronesi Giulia, Spaggiari Lorenzo, Margaritora Stefano, Meacci Elisa

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A.Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 19;19(1):307. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02476-1.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate surgical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted (RATS) thymectomy in the treatment of large (diameter >  = 5 cm) resectable thymomas. Clinical data of 301 thymectomies for thymoma, performed in 7 high-volume centers from 2010 to 2023, were retrospectively reviewed. 132 RATS thymectomies were performed: 59 (44.7%) for small and 73 (55.3%) for large thymomas. Conversion (p = 0.48), significant complications (p = 0.26), and hospital stay (p = 0.79) were similar in both groups. Overall, 191 large thymomas were operated on: 73(38.2%) by RATS, 118 (61.8%) by open approach. Comparing the RATS approach with the open standard approach for the treatment of large thymomas, more post-operative complications (p < 0.001) but similar major complications (p = 0.11) and a longer in-hospital stay (p < 0.001) were recorded in the open group. Five-year OS (95% vs 85%, p = 0.14) and DFS (86 vs 93%, p = 0.18) of patients affected by large thymomas were comparable between RATS and the open group. To minimize selection-confounding factors between the two large thymoma groups (RATS vs open) in relation to the outcomes, a 1:1 propensity score match (PSM) analysis was performed, and surgical and oncological outcomes reassessed. Chest tube length (p < 0.001) and in-hospital stay (p < 0.001) were confirmed to be longer in the open group. Prognostic factors for oncological outcomes for large thymomas were also confirmed after PSM analysis. Adjuvant radiotherapy was the only predictive factor (p = 0.033) affecting DFS, while no factor was confirmed for OS at multivariable analysis. RATS seems to be a safe and effective alternative to open surgery for treating large thymomas.

摘要

本研究旨在评估机器人辅助(RATS)胸腺切除术治疗大型(直径≥5 cm)可切除胸腺瘤的手术及肿瘤学结局。回顾性分析了2010年至2023年期间在7个高容量中心进行的301例胸腺瘤胸腺切除术的临床资料。共进行了132例RATS胸腺切除术:59例(44.7%)为小型胸腺瘤,73例(55.3%)为大型胸腺瘤。两组的中转率(p = 0.48)、严重并发症发生率(p = 0.26)和住院时间(p = 0.79)相似。总体而言,191例大型胸腺瘤接受了手术治疗:73例(38.2%)采用RATS手术,118例(61.8%)采用开放手术。比较RATS手术与开放标准手术治疗大型胸腺瘤的情况,开放手术组术后并发症更多(p < 0.001),但主要并发症相似(p = 0.11),住院时间更长(p < 0.001)。大型胸腺瘤患者的5年总生存率(95%对85%,p = 0.14)和无病生存率(86%对93%,p = 0.18)在RATS组和开放手术组之间具有可比性。为了尽量减少两个大型胸腺瘤组(RATS组与开放手术组)在结局方面的选择混杂因素,进行了1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析,并重新评估了手术及肿瘤学结局。结果证实,开放手术组的胸管留置时间(p < 0.001)和住院时间(p < 0.001)更长。PSM分析后也证实了大型胸腺瘤肿瘤学结局的预后因素。辅助放疗是影响无病生存率的唯一预测因素(p = 0.033),而多变量分析中未确认影响总生存率的因素。对于大型胸腺瘤的治疗,RATS似乎是开放手术的一种安全有效的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验