Naylor Nichola R, Hasso-Agopsowicz Mateusz, Kim Chaelin, Ma Yixuan, Frost Isabel, Abbas Kaja, Aguilar Gisela, Fuller Naomi, Robotham Julie V, Jit Mark
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
HCAI, Fungal, AMR, AMU & Sepsis Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK.
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jun 19;10(6):e016249. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016249.
Antibiotic resistance (ABR) may increase hospital costs, utility loss and mortality risk per patient. Understanding these losses at national, regional and global scales is necessary for efficiently tackling ABR. Our aim is to estimate the global economic burden of antibiotic-resistant infections and the potential for bacterial vaccines to mitigate this burden.
We take healthcare system and labour productivity perspectives. Hospital cost-per-case and length-of-stay estimates were calculated through meta-analyses and reviewing published systematic reviews. Unit labour productivity losses were estimated through a human capital approach. Modelled estimates were used where secondary data were missing. Death and incidence data were combined with unit cost data to estimate the economic burden associated with ABR in 2019, and the potential costs averted (in 2019 US$) based on uptake scenarios of vaccines that currently exist or are likely to be developed.
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis had the highest mean hospital cost attributable to ABR per patient, the range was US$3000 in lower-income settings to US$41 000 in high-income settings, with carbapenem-resistant infections associated with a high cost-per-case of US$3000-US$7000 depending on syndrome. ABR was associated with a median value of US$693 billion (IQR: US$627 bn-US$768 bn) in hospital costs globally, with US$207 bn (IQR: US$186 bn-US$229 bn) potentially avertable by vaccines. Productivity losses were quantified at almost US$194 billion, with US$76 bn avertable by vaccines.
The economic burden of ABR is associated with high levels of hospital bed-days occupied, hospital spending and labour productivity losses globally and should, therefore, remain high on national and international policy agendas. Vaccines against would avert a substantial portion of the economic burden associated with ABR. More robust evidence, particularly in low-income countries, on the hospital costs, associated with and attributable to ABR, is needed.
抗生素耐药性(ABR)可能会增加每位患者的医院成本、效用损失和死亡风险。在国家、区域和全球范围内了解这些损失对于有效应对ABR至关重要。我们的目标是估计抗生素耐药性感染的全球经济负担以及细菌疫苗减轻这一负担的潜力。
我们采用医疗保健系统和劳动生产率的视角。通过荟萃分析和回顾已发表的系统评价来计算每例病例的医院成本和住院时间估计值。单位劳动生产率损失通过人力资本方法进行估计。在缺少二级数据的情况下使用模型估计值。将死亡和发病率数据与单位成本数据相结合,以估计2019年与ABR相关的经济负担,以及根据现有或可能研发的疫苗接种情况可避免的潜在成本(以2019年美元计)。
耐多药结核病每位患者因ABR导致的平均医院成本最高,范围从低收入环境中的3000美元到高收入环境中的41000美元,碳青霉烯类耐药感染每例病例成本较高,根据综合征不同为3000美元至7000美元。全球范围内,ABR与医院成本中位数6930亿美元(四分位距:6270亿美元至7680亿美元)相关,疫苗有可能避免2070亿美元(四分位距:1860亿美元至2290亿美元)。生产力损失量化约为1940亿美元,疫苗可避免760亿美元。
ABR的经济负担与全球范围内大量占用的医院病床日、医院支出和劳动生产率损失相关,因此应继续在国家和国际政策议程中占据重要位置。针对[未提及具体疫苗名称]的疫苗可避免与ABR相关的很大一部分经济负担。需要更有力的证据,特别是在低收入国家,以了解与ABR相关并可归因于ABR的医院成本。