Suppr超能文献

[经皮穿刺引流腹部脓肿。II. 与脓毒症手术相比的价值]

[Percutaneous drainage of abdominal abscesses. II. Value in comparison with septic surgery].

作者信息

Dähnert W, Günther R W, Börner N, Braun B, Gamstätter G, Rothmund M

出版信息

Chirurg. 1985 Sep;56(9):584-8.

PMID:4053767
Abstract

Based on the review of the literature and experience with own cases the current status of the therapy of abdominal abscesses by percutaneous catheter drainage is described. Indications, reasons for failure, complications, and mortality are presented in detail. Compared with surgery percutaneous abscess drainage (PAD) seems to have better results; however, this statement should be viewed with caution since the input of modern imaging techniques might have improved current surgical success rates. A trial of PAD can be recommended in all feasible cases because it offers high curability with little morbidity.

摘要

基于文献回顾及自身病例经验,本文描述了经皮导管引流治疗腹腔脓肿的现状。详细介绍了适应证、失败原因、并发症及死亡率。与手术治疗相比,经皮脓肿引流(PAD)似乎效果更好;然而,鉴于现代成像技术的应用可能提高了当前手术的成功率,对这一说法应谨慎看待。在所有可行的病例中,推荐尝试PAD,因为它治愈率高且发病率低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验