Cui YiMeng, Wang DongYang, Gao XiaoCai
Institute of Applied Psychology, School of Public Management, Northwest University, Shaanxi, China.
Psych J. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1002/pchj.70024.
Different types of epistemic curiosities are associated with opposite attitudes toward risky behavior. However, few studies have taken environmental factors into account. We do not know the specific performance of different curiosities regarding traffic risky behavior (TRB) after introducing public attitudes. Epistemic curiosity is the desire for new knowledge or information. There are two types: interest curiosity and deprivation curiosity. Based on the uncertainty-identity theory and the interest/deprivation model of curiosity, we explored the impact of epistemic curiosity on TRB and the mediating role of conformity. Study 1 employed a cross-sectional design with mediation effect tests. Study 2 employed two substudies, further exploring the specific performance of different levels of interest/deprivation curiosity through a 2 × 2 mixed design and elaborating on the causal relationships between the variables. Study 1 revealed a positive correlation between interest curiosity and TRB, but no such correlation was found between deprivation curiosity and TRB. Mediation test results showed that conformity fully mediated the relationship between deprivation curiosity and TRB, while it could not explain the relationship between interest curiosity and TRB. Study 2 results showed that people with higher levels of deprivation curiosity could be influenced by public attitudes to change their attitudes toward TRB. Our findings provide empirical evidence for distinguishing between different types of epistemic curiosity, as well as a new explanatory mechanism for the emergence of TRBs.
不同类型的认知好奇心与对风险行为的相反态度相关联。然而,很少有研究考虑到环境因素。在引入公众态度后,我们并不清楚不同好奇心在交通风险行为(TRB)方面的具体表现。认知好奇心是对新知识或信息的渴望。它有两种类型:兴趣好奇心和匮乏好奇心。基于不确定性认同理论以及好奇心的兴趣/匮乏模型,我们探讨了认知好奇心对交通风险行为的影响以及从众的中介作用。研究1采用了带有中介效应检验的横断面设计。研究2采用了两个子研究,通过2×2混合设计进一步探究不同水平的兴趣/匮乏好奇心的具体表现,并阐述变量之间的因果关系。研究1揭示了兴趣好奇心与交通风险行为之间存在正相关,但在匮乏好奇心与交通风险行为之间未发现此类相关性。中介检验结果表明,从众完全中介了匮乏好奇心与交通风险行为之间的关系,而它无法解释兴趣好奇心与交通风险行为之间的关系。研究2的结果表明,具有较高匮乏好奇心水平的人可能会受到公众态度的影响,从而改变他们对交通风险行为的态度。我们的研究结果为区分不同类型的认知好奇心提供了实证证据,也为交通风险行为的出现提供了一种新的解释机制。