Galosi Eleonora, Litewczuk Daniel, De Stefano Gianfranco, Di Pietro Giuseppe, Di Stefano Giulia, Esposito Nicoletta, Evangelisti Enrico, Falco Pietro, Leone Caterina, Sachau Juliane, Baron Ralf, Finnerup Nanna Brix, Truini Andrea
Department of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Division of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Pain. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003685.
This cross-sectional retrospective study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of cold detection thresholds (CDT) and warm detection thresholds (WDT), measured by quantitative sensory testing, for detecting small fiber impairment in polyneuropathy and diagnosing small fiber neuropathy (SFN). A total of 384 individuals with distally distributed sensory disturbances were included. Using ACTTION criteria, 138 patients with polyneuropathy were identified. Among them, 36 were diagnosed with SFN, 91 with mixed fiber polyneuropathy, and 11 with pure large fiber polyneuropathy. First, we assessed CDT and WDT accuracy, both individually and combined (ie, an abnormal value in either CDT or WDT), in detecting small fiber impairment in polyneuropathy. Next, we calculated CDT and WDT diagnostic accuracy for SFN, both alone and combined, and evaluated their accuracy when integrated with small fiber-related clinical abnormalities. Isolated abnormalities in CDT or WDT showed relatively low diagnostic accuracy. However, combined abnormalities achieved a sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 70% for detecting small fiber impairment in distal symmetric polyneuropathy. For SFN diagnosis, combining CDT and WDT yielded 78% sensitivity, 70% specificity, and a 94% negative predictive value. These metrics improved to 78% sensitivity and 100% specificity when CDT or WDT were integrated with small-fiber-related clinical abnormalities. Although individual CDT and WDT assessments offer limited diagnostic accuracy, their combination provides a practical, noninvasive approach for screening small fiber impairment in distal symmetric polyneuropathy and diagnosing SFN. This strategy may reduce the need for more invasive and less cost-effective procedures, like skin biopsy.
这项横断面回顾性研究评估了通过定量感觉测试测量的冷觉检测阈值(CDT)和温觉检测阈值(WDT)在检测多发性神经病中小纤维损伤以及诊断小纤维神经病(SFN)方面的诊断准确性。总共纳入了384例有远端分布感觉障碍的个体。根据ACTTION标准,确定了138例多发性神经病患者。其中,36例被诊断为SFN,91例为混合性纤维多发性神经病,11例为单纯性大纤维多发性神经病。首先,我们评估了CDT和WDT各自以及联合(即CDT或WDT中有一个异常值)检测多发性神经病中小纤维损伤的准确性。接下来,我们计算了CDT和WDT单独及联合诊断SFN的准确性,并评估了它们与小纤维相关临床异常情况相结合时的准确性。CDT或WDT单独出现异常时诊断准确性相对较低。然而,联合异常在检测远端对称性多发性神经病中小纤维损伤方面的敏感性为69%,特异性为70%。对于SFN诊断,联合CDT和WDT的敏感性为78%,特异性为70%,阴性预测值为94%。当CDT或WDT与小纤维相关临床异常情况相结合时,这些指标的敏感性提高到78%,特异性提高到100%。尽管单独的CDT和WDT评估诊断准确性有限,但它们的联合提供了一种实用的、非侵入性的方法来筛查远端对称性多发性神经病中的小纤维损伤并诊断SFN。这种策略可能会减少对更具侵入性且成本效益较低的程序(如皮肤活检)的需求。