Wang Xinyu, Nong Luyuan, Schaar Gioia, Koenders Belinda, Jonker Martijs, de Leeuw Wim, Ter Kuile Benno H
Biology and Microbial Food Safety, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
RNA Biology and Applied Bioinformatics, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Aug 5;13(8):e0098325. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00983-25. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
resistance can develop in bacteria as a result of exposure to sublethal concentrations of antibiotics. Once the strain has become resistant to an initial antibiotic, this can cause cross-resistance or collateral sensitivity to a second antimicrobial. Specific collateral sensitivity is rarely conserved across species because the mechanisms triggered in different microorganisms to resist antibiotics are often different. In this study, we explored which collateral sensitivity or cross-resistance networks are present in six species of bacteria with induced resistance. These six species were induced to become resistant to amoxicillin/cefepime, enrofloxacin, kanamycin, tetracycline, erythromycin, and chloramphenicol (T. Pulingam, T. Parumasivam, A. M. Gazzali, A. M. Sulaiman, J. Y. Chee, et al., Eur J Pharm Sci 170:106103, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106103). In this study, the collateral sensitivity and the cross-resistance networks were evaluated by measuring the increase or decrease of MIC of 13 antibiotics that are often used in the clinic. Collateral sensitivity for kanamycin occurred in five species made resistant to chloramphenicol and tetracycline and for β-lactams in five species made resistant to kanamycin. Genetic analysis revealed that consistently mutated in five bacterial species that exhibited resistance to kanamycin, suggesting that mutations in domain IV of are the primary contributors to the consistent CS phenotype observed in these species. Based on considerations of resistance, a treatment protocol starting with chloramphenicol/tetracycline, followed by kanamycin, and ending with amoxicillin may eliminate bacteria that have developed resistance against the initial treatment.IMPORTANCECollateral sensitivity and cross-resistance influence the outcome of antimicrobial infection treatments. To evaluate the potential effects of these phenomena, collateral sensitivity and the cross-resistance networks were documented by measuring the MIC of six species of bacteria with induced resistance against 13 antibiotics. These effects are indeed, in some cases, clinically relevant. One example was further explored: collateral sensitivity for kanamycin in five species made resistant to chloramphenicol and tetracycline and for β-lactams in five species made resistant to kanamycin. In this case, genetic analysis revealed that consistently mutated in the five bacterial species that exhibited resistance to kanamycin. The observed collateral sensitivity can be explained by these mutations.
细菌接触亚致死浓度的抗生素后可能会产生耐药性。一旦菌株对初始抗生素产生耐药性,这可能会导致对第二种抗菌药物产生交叉耐药性或附带敏感性。特定的附带敏感性在不同物种间很少保守,因为不同微生物中触发的抵抗抗生素的机制通常不同。在本研究中,我们探究了六种诱导耐药的细菌中存在哪些附带敏感性或交叉耐药网络。这六种细菌被诱导对阿莫西林/头孢吡肟、恩诺沙星、卡那霉素、四环素、红霉素和氯霉素产生耐药性(T. Pulingam、T. Parumasivam、A. M. Gazzali、A. M. Sulaiman、J. Y. Chee等人,《欧洲药理学杂志》170:106103,2022,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106103)。在本研究中,通过测量临床上常用的13种抗生素的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的增加或降低来评估附带敏感性和交叉耐药网络。对氯霉素和四环素耐药的五种细菌对卡那霉素产生了附带敏感性,对卡那霉素耐药的五种细菌对β-内酰胺类产生了附带敏感性。基因分析表明,在对卡那霉素耐药的五种细菌中始终发生突变,这表明的结构域IV中的突变是这些物种中观察到的一致的附带敏感性表型的主要原因。基于耐药性的考虑,以氯霉素/四环素开始、接着使用卡那霉素、最后使用阿莫西林的治疗方案可能会清除对初始治疗产生耐药性的细菌。
重要性
附带敏感性和交叉耐药性会影响抗菌感染治疗的结果。为了评估这些现象的潜在影响,通过测量六种诱导耐药的细菌对13种抗生素的最低抑菌浓度来记录附带敏感性和交叉耐药网络。在某些情况下,这些影响确实与临床相关。进一步探究了一个例子:对氯霉素和四环素耐药的五种细菌对卡那霉素产生了附带敏感性,对卡那霉素耐药的五种细菌对β-内酰胺类产生了附带敏感性。在这种情况下,基因分析表明,在对卡那霉素耐药的五种细菌中始终发生突变。观察到的附带敏感性可以用这些突变来解释。