• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首次下床活动时间对腰椎间盘突出症单侧双孔通道内镜手术的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析

Impact of first ambulation time on unilateral biportal endoscopy in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tang Yi, Zhang Zhongyi, Wu Zhouhan, Jin Zhaokai, Gong Yichen, Zhang Wen, Cheng Kai, Zhou Jiaju, Tong Peijian, Xu Taotao, Lv Shuaijie

机构信息

Orthopedics and Traumatology Medical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Orthopedics and Traumatology Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Graduate School of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2025 Sep 1;111(9):6362-6373. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002686. Epub 2025 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002686
PMID:40540256
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12430821/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of early versus late postoperative ambulation on clinical outcomes and complications following unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) for lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched up to February 2025. Eligible studies were grouped based on ambulation timing: early (<24 hours) versus late (≥24 hours). Outcomes included changes in leg pain and back pain measured by the visual analog scale, functional recovery via the Oswestry Disability Index (ΔODI), complication rates, and patient satisfaction (MacNab criteria). A random-effects model was used to pool data and calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Fourteen retrospective studies comprising 715 patients were included (early group: 230; late group: 485). Early ambulation significantly improved leg pain within 3 days (WMD = -6.87; 95% CI: -7.48 to -6.26; P < 0.001) and at 6 months (WMD = -7.59; 95% CI: -7.98 to -7.20; P < 0.001), both exceeding the minimal clinically important difference. No significant between-group differences were observed for back pain (all time points), functional outcomes (ΔODI), complication rates, or patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Early ambulation (<24 hours) after UBE is associated with superior short-term relief of leg pain and does not increase postoperative complication risk. However, it offers no advantage in long-term pain, disability, or satisfaction. Early mobilization can be safely recommended as part of postoperative care, with individualized protocols based on patient and surgical factors.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估单侧双通道内镜(UBE)治疗腰椎间盘突出症术后早期与晚期活动对临床结局和并发症的影响。

方法

按照PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析。检索截至2025年2月的PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆。符合条件的研究根据活动时间分组:早期(<24小时)与晚期(≥24小时)。结局包括通过视觉模拟量表测量的腿痛和背痛变化、通过Oswestry功能障碍指数(ΔODI)评估的功能恢复、并发症发生率和患者满意度(MacNab标准)。采用随机效应模型汇总数据并计算加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

纳入14项回顾性研究,共715例患者(早期组:230例;晚期组:485例)。早期活动在术后3天(WMD = -6.87;95%CI:-7.48至-6.26;P < 0.001)和6个月时(WMD = -7.59;95%CI:-7.98至-7.20;P < 0.001)能显著改善腿痛,均超过最小临床重要差异。在背痛(所有时间点)、功能结局(ΔODI)、并发症发生率或患者满意度方面,两组间未观察到显著差异。

结论

UBE术后早期(<24小时)活动与更好的短期腿痛缓解相关,且不会增加术后并发症风险。然而,在长期疼痛、功能障碍或满意度方面并无优势。早期活动可作为术后护理的一部分安全推荐,并根据患者和手术因素制定个性化方案。

相似文献

1
Impact of first ambulation time on unilateral biportal endoscopy in lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.首次下床活动时间对腰椎间盘突出症单侧双孔通道内镜手术的影响:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Int J Surg. 2025 Sep 1;111(9):6362-6373. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002686. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
2
[A comparative study on the clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation].单侧双通道内镜与经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及安全性比较研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Sep 1;63(9):814-820. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20241016-00463.
3
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and muscle injury in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal spinal surgery, unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery, and percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy: a six-month follow-up.关节镜辅助单通道脊柱手术、单侧双通道内镜手术和经皮椎间孔腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的短期临床疗效及肌肉损伤比较:六个月随访
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 21;20(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06088-1.
4
[Early effectiveness of posterior 180-degree decompression via unilateral biportal endoscopy in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with MSU-1 lumbar disc herniation].[经单侧双通道内镜下后路180°减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并MSU-1型腰椎间盘突出症的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 15;39(6):735-740. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202504083.
5
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of far-lateral lumbar disc herniation.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗极外侧腰椎间盘突出症的对比
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Aug 4;48(1):588. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03748-y.
6
Surgical Invasiveness, Hidden Blood Loss, and Outcomes of Two Endoscopic Lumbar Fusion Techniques for Degenerative Disease: A Comparative Study.两种内镜下腰椎融合技术治疗退行性疾病的手术侵袭性、隐匿性失血及疗效:一项比较研究
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jun 25:124208. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124208.
7
Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.微创椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术/开放椎间盘切除术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 4;2014(9):CD010328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010328.pub2.
8
Clinical Efficacy of Biportal versus Uniportal Endoscopic Discectomy for Far Lateral Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study Analysis.双孔与单孔内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗极外侧腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究分析
World Neurosurg. 2025 May;197:123788. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123788. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
9
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的系统评价和Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jun;33(6):2139-2153. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08116-2. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
10
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy via the Contralateral Sublaminar Approach for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Very High-Grade Migration: A Technical Note and Case Series.经对侧椎板下入路单侧双孔道内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗极高度移位型腰椎间盘突出症:技术说明与病例系列
World Neurosurg. 2025 May;197:123939. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.123939. Epub 2025 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Unilateral biportal endoscopy: review and detailed surgical approach to extraforaminal approach.单侧双孔道内镜检查:椎间孔外入路的综述及详细手术方法
EFORT Open Rev. 2025 Mar 3;10(3):151-155. doi: 10.1530/EOR-24-0137. Print 2025 Mar 1.
2
Impact of Condoliase on Health-related Quality of Life in Participants With Radicular Leg Pain Associated With Lumbar Disk Herniation: Results From a United States Phase 3 Clinical Trial.康多利亚酶对伴腰椎间盘突出症的神经根性腿痛患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项美国3期临床试验的结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jun 15;50(12):796-803. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005327. Epub 2025 Mar 11.
3
Psychopathological Influences on Surgical and Clinical Outcomes in Lumbar Disk Herniation: Prediction Models and Literature Analysis.
腰椎间盘突出症手术及临床结局的精神病理学影响:预测模型与文献分析
J Pers Med. 2025 Jan 26;15(2):48. doi: 10.3390/jpm15020048.
4
Percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation in geriatric patients.经皮单侧双孔道内镜下老年有症状腰椎间盘突出症切除术
Front Surg. 2025 Jan 17;11:1519952. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1519952. eCollection 2024.
5
Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic and Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Degenerative Disease.单侧双通道内镜与经皮椎间孔内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床与影像学比较
Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(4):1105-1113. doi: 10.1111/os.14361. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
6
Prevalence of lumbar disc herniation in populations with different symptoms based on magnetic resonance imaging study.基于磁共振成像研究的不同症状人群中腰椎间盘突出症的患病率。
J Clin Neurosci. 2024 Nov;129:110839. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2024.110839. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
7
[Effect and complication among different kinds of spinal endoscopic surgery for lumbar disc herniation].[不同类型腰椎间盘突出症脊柱内镜手术的疗效与并发症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Mar 25;37(3):228-34. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20220860.
8
[Clinical outcomes and bone resection analysis of unilateral double-channel endoscopic technique in treating lumbar disc herniation].[单侧双通道内镜技术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及骨质切除分析]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Mar 25;37(3):222-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20221038.
9
[Clinical study of lumbar stability after unilateral biportal endoscopy in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases].[单侧双通道内镜治疗退变性腰椎疾病后腰段稳定性的临床研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Mar 1;62(3):187-193. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20230717-00012.
10
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Lumbar Disc Herniation.单侧双通道内镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎间盘突出症
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2023 Jun 27;13(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00020. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.