• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过使用电子病历提高临床医生效率的高级Epic个性化课程的成果:回顾性研究

Outcomes of an Advanced Epic Personalization Course on Clinician Efficiency through Use of Electronic Medical Records: Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Chen Junye George, Lai Hao Xing, Wong Shi Min, Pan Terry Ling Te, Lim Er Luen, Liau Zi Qiang Glen

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

National University Polyclinics Headquarters, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 20;9:e68491. doi: 10.2196/68491.

DOI:10.2196/68491
PMID:40540740
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12204635/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since Singapore's first migration to Epic in 2022, we have been conducting an advanced Epic personalization course twice a year for health care professionals with at least 3 months of experience using the system. Electronic medical records education is an under-recognized pillar in reducing health information technology-related stress and clinician burnout.

OBJECTIVE

The intent of the course is to improve clinician efficiency through customization and personalization of Epic interfaces. We hypothesized that compared to their colleagues, trained clinicians would demonstrate significant quantitative improvements in use of the Epic system after our course.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis from July 2022 to January 2024, including 17 clinicians among 77 individuals who attended our course. Recruitment was done through digital mailers sent out via the local hospital announcement channels. Interested clinicians were able to register for our course via the National University Of Singapore website. Our one-day course involves physical lessons and interprofessional, case-based discussions emphasizing a wide range of high-yield Epic functionalities with practice exercises, such as drafting referral letter templates. Three months of pre- and postcourse Epic usage statistics of the trained clinicians were retrieved based on aggregate data provided by Epic Singapore. Performance metrics included documentation length, time spent in Epic functionalities and use of SmartPhrases, order sets and preference lists.

RESULTS

At three months post-course, documentation length decreased by 45.8% (711.8 characters) compared to a 22.2% (126.4 characters) increase among controls. Trained clinicians demonstrated a 2.47-fold increase in use of order sets from 16.2% to 40%, and a 49.9% increase in orders from preference lists after the course, from 35.1% to 52.6%. In total, trained clinicians demonstrated a 1.8-fold increase in combined use of orders from preference lists or order sets after the course, from 51.4% to 92.6%. The number of SmartPhrases created by trained clinicians was 5.64 times higher than among controls, in addition to a 5.57-fold higher use of Quick Filters than controls. Moreover, time in the Chart Review section per day decreased by 29.3% (4.6 min) among trained clinicians versus an increase of 14.6% (2.8 min) among controls. Compared to controls, trained clinicians spent 36.7% (219.6 min) less time in the Epic system per day, 56.6% (29 min) less time on Notes per day, and 57.5% (10.7 min) less time on orders per day.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, trained clinicians demonstrated more efficiency in their use of Epic, with reduced time spent across various functionalities. Increased use of Smart Tools, including SmartPhrases and Quick Filters was also observed among trained clinicians, which indicated efficiency in reducing total usage time. These findings demonstrated broad improvements across multiple physician efficiency metrics among participating clinicians of our advanced Epic personalization course. These gains may contribute to improved mental health among health care professionals and enhanced productivity within health care systems.

摘要

背景

自2022年新加坡首次迁移至Epic系统以来,我们每年为有至少3个月该系统使用经验的医疗保健专业人员举办两次高级Epic个性化课程。电子病历教育是减轻与健康信息技术相关的压力和临床医生职业倦怠的一个未得到充分认识的支柱。

目的

该课程的目的是通过定制和个性化Epic界面来提高临床医生的效率。我们假设,与他们的同事相比,经过培训的临床医生在我们的课程结束后,在使用Epic系统方面将表现出显著的量化改善。

方法

我们进行了一项回顾性分析,时间跨度为2022年7月至2024年1月,包括参加我们课程的77人中的17名临床医生。招募是通过当地医院公告渠道发送的数字邮件进行的。感兴趣的临床医生能够通过新加坡国立大学网站注册我们的课程。我们为期一天的课程包括实体课程以及跨专业的、基于案例的讨论,强调通过练习(如起草转诊信模板)来掌握广泛的高收益Epic功能。根据新加坡Epic提供的汇总数据,获取了经过培训的临床医生在课程前后三个月的Epic使用统计数据。绩效指标包括文档长度、在Epic功能中花费的时间以及智能短语、医嘱集和偏好列表的使用情况。

结果

课程结束三个月后,与对照组增加22.2%(126.4个字符)相比,文档长度减少了45.8%(711.8个字符)。经过培训的临床医生在课程结束后,医嘱集的使用从16.2%增加到40%,增长了2.47倍,偏好列表中的医嘱从35.1%增加到52.6%,增长了49.9%。总体而言,经过培训的临床医生在课程结束后,偏好列表或医嘱集的联合使用从51.4%增加到92.6%,增长了1.8倍。经过培训的临床医生创建的智能短语数量比对照组高5.6倍,快速过滤器的使用比对照组高5.57倍。此外,经过培训的临床医生每天在图表审查部分花费的时间减少了29.3%(4.6分钟),而对照组增加了14.6%(2.8分钟)。与对照组相比,经过培训的临床医生每天在Epic系统中花费的时间减少了36.7%(219.6分钟),每天在记录上花费的时间减少了56.6%(29分钟),每天在医嘱上花费的时间减少了57.5%(10.7分钟)。

结论

总体而言,经过培训的临床医生在使用Epic方面表现出更高的效率,在各种功能上花费的时间减少。在经过培训的临床医生中还观察到智能工具(包括智能短语和快速过滤器)的使用增加,这表明在减少总使用时间方面的效率。这些发现表明,在我们的高级Epic个性化课程的参与临床医生中,多个医生效率指标有广泛改善。这些收获可能有助于改善医疗保健专业人员的心理健康,并提高医疗保健系统内的生产力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/2602b1bb40cc/formative-v9-e68491-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/28e9b280a98a/formative-v9-e68491-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/f79c97b0c692/formative-v9-e68491-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/ae65fa5e15d1/formative-v9-e68491-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/bd82748f60f7/formative-v9-e68491-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/535d826ff495/formative-v9-e68491-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/2602b1bb40cc/formative-v9-e68491-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/28e9b280a98a/formative-v9-e68491-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/f79c97b0c692/formative-v9-e68491-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/ae65fa5e15d1/formative-v9-e68491-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/bd82748f60f7/formative-v9-e68491-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/535d826ff495/formative-v9-e68491-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef92/12204635/2602b1bb40cc/formative-v9-e68491-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of an Advanced Epic Personalization Course on Clinician Efficiency through Use of Electronic Medical Records: Retrospective Study.通过使用电子病历提高临床医生效率的高级Epic个性化课程的成果:回顾性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 20;9:e68491. doi: 10.2196/68491.
2
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
5
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
6
Reading aids for adults with low vision.针对视力低下成年人的阅读辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD003303. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003303.pub4.
7
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
8
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
9
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
10
Interventions to improve adherence to inhaled steroids for asthma.改善哮喘患者吸入性糖皮质激素依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 18;4(4):CD012226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012226.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Impacts on quality of care following electronic health record implementation within a large Canadian community hospital: a qualitative study.加拿大一家大型社区医院实施电子健康记录后对医疗质量的影响:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e097646. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097646.
2
25 Years of Electronic Health Record Implementation Processes: Scoping Review.电子健康记录实施流程25年:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 3;27:e60077. doi: 10.2196/60077.
3
Use of Epic Electronic Health Record System for Health Care Research: Scoping Review.
利用 Epic 电子健康记录系统进行医疗保健研究:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 15;25:e51003. doi: 10.2196/51003.
4
Transitioning from One Electronic Health Record to Another: A Systematic Review.从一个电子健康记录系统过渡到另一个系统:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Oct;38(Suppl 4):956-964. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08276-3. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
5
Going electronic: an Epic move.走向电子化:Epic 的举措。
Br Dent J. 2022 Jul;233(1):55-58. doi: 10.1038/s41415-022-4404-6. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
6
Which Electronic Health Record System Should We Use? A Systematic Review.我们应该使用哪种电子健康记录系统?系统评价。
Med Princ Pract. 2022;31(4):342-351. doi: 10.1159/000525135. Epub 2022 May 18.
7
Electronic health record implementation and healthcare workers' work characteristics and autonomous motivation-a before-and-after study.电子健康记录实施与医疗保健工作者的工作特征和自主激励:一项前后对照研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 May 3;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01858-x.
8
Department-focused electronic health record thrive training.以科室为重点的电子健康记录蓬勃发展培训。
JAMIA Open. 2022 Apr 9;5(2):ooac025. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac025. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Improving physician wellness through electronic health record education.通过电子健康记录教育改善医生的健康状况。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2021 Sep;56(5):327-333. doi: 10.1177/00912174211034633. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
10
Association between evidence-based training and clinician proficiency in electronic health record use.基于证据的培训与临床医生电子病历使用熟练度的关联。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):824-831. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa333.