Palau Roig Miguel, Botto Lugo Sarai Margarita, Martínez Albaladejo Pilar, Utiel Atienzar Ana, Cuenca Ramírez Maria de Los Desamparados, González Díez David, Ferrer Grau Raúl, Planelles Gómez Jorge, Martínez-Pérez María Jesús, Vidal Moreno Juan Francisco
Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05054-z.
To evaluate the utility and complications of urethrosonography (US) in the preoperative assessment of urethral stricture compared to traditional diagnostic methods and its impact on therapeutic decision-making.
A prospective observational study was conducted on male patients diagnosed with urethral stricture who were candidates for surgical treatment. Preoperative assessment included flexible urethrocystoscopy, voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), and US. Demographic and epidemiological data were recorded and analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Agreement between diagnostic techniques was assessed using the Cohen's Kappa coefficient. The impact of findings on surgical decision-making was evaluated, and potential complications associated with each technique were documented.
Thirty-three male patients with a mean age of 59.5 years, diagnosed with urethral stricture who were candidates for surgical treatment, were evaluated. No statistically significant differences were found in the location or severity of the stricture among the different techniques, with good concordance with intraoperative findings. US demonstrated higher sensitivity (60% vs. 44.2%) and specificity (87.8% vs. 84.9%) compared to VCUG in assessing the length of the stricture, and was also more accurate than urethrocystoscopy in determining the degree of spongiofibrosis (77.02% vs. 69.11% for sensitivity, and 81.9% vs. 74.5% for specificity). The choice of preoperative technique influenced the selection of the surgical approach.
Urethrosonography is more sensitive and specific than traditional techniques in determining the length of the stricture, with similar concordance with intraoperative findings. It may serve as an alternative to conventional diagnostic tests in the preoperative evaluation of urethral stricture, offering several advantages such as the absence of radiation, lower complication rates, and its non-invasive nature.
与传统诊断方法相比,评估尿道超声检查(US)在尿道狭窄术前评估中的实用性和并发症,以及其对治疗决策的影响。
对诊断为尿道狭窄且适合手术治疗的男性患者进行前瞻性观察研究。术前评估包括软性尿道膀胱镜检查、排尿性膀胱尿道造影(VCUG)和US。记录并分析人口统计学和流行病学数据。计算敏感性和特异性。使用科恩卡方系数评估诊断技术之间的一致性。评估检查结果对手术决策的影响,并记录每种技术相关的潜在并发症。
对33例平均年龄59.5岁、诊断为尿道狭窄且适合手术治疗的男性患者进行了评估。不同技术在狭窄部位或严重程度方面未发现统计学显著差异,与术中发现具有良好的一致性。在评估狭窄长度方面,与VCUG相比,US显示出更高的敏感性(60%对44.2%)和特异性(87.8%对84.9%),并且在确定海绵体纤维化程度方面也比尿道膀胱镜检查更准确(敏感性分别为77.02%对69.11%,特异性分别为81.9%对74.5%)。术前技术的选择影响了手术方式的选择。
在确定狭窄长度方面,尿道超声检查比传统技术更敏感、更具特异性,与术中发现的一致性相似。它可作为尿道狭窄术前评估中传统诊断测试的替代方法,具有无辐射、并发症发生率低和非侵入性等多个优点。