Lin Mingjie, Liang Huan, Zhang Kai, Chen Tongshuai, Wang Juntao, Han Wenqiang, Rong Bing, Zhong Jingquan
State Key Laboratory for Innovation and Transformation of Luobing Theory; Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Remodeling and Function Research of Chinese Ministry of Education, Chinese National Health Commission, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Shandong Province; Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Department of Cardiology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao), Qingdao, China.
Commun Med (Lond). 2025 Jun 22;5(1):245. doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00960-1.
The optimal timing of undergoing catheter ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains uncertain. We aimed to investigate the impact of diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) on AF recurrence and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) following catheter ablation.
This study analyzed prospective observational data from a single center, including 2097 participants (59.98 ± 10.57 years, 62.7% male) undergoing AF ablation between January 2016 and December 2020. Patients were stratified by DAT: ≤ 1 year, > 1 to ≤ 3 years, and > 3 years. Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of AF recurrence and MACCE.
During the 46.89 ± 16.46 months follow-up, AF recurs in 512 patients (24.6%). A longer delay per month is significantly associated with a higher recurrence of AF based on multivariable Cox regression analysis [Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.003 (95% CI: 1.001-1.005), p = 0.015]. This association remains consistent in patients with persistent AF (HR compared to DAT ≤ 1 year: 1.548 [95% CI: 1.139-2.102], p = 0.016), but not in those with paroxysmal AF. Left atrial diameter ≥40 mm and female are identified as independent predictors of AF recurrence. The overall impact of DAT on MACCE occurrence is not significant, with age and vascular disease being independent predictors.
Early catheter ablation is preferable for maintaining sinus rhythm, particularly in persistent AF. However, DAT dose not influence the incidence of MACCE. These findings endorse the paradigm shift towards early ablation.
对于心房颤动(AF)患者而言,进行导管消融的最佳时机仍不明确。我们旨在研究诊断至消融时间(DAT)对导管消融术后房颤复发及主要不良心血管和脑血管事件(MACCE)的影响。
本研究分析了来自单一中心的前瞻性观察数据,包括2016年1月至2020年12月期间接受房颤消融的2097名参与者(年龄59.98±10.57岁,男性占62.7%)。患者按DAT分层:≤1年、>1至≤3年、>3年。采用Cox比例风险模型和逻辑回归分析来确定房颤复发和MACCE的预测因素。
在46.89±16.46个月的随访期间,512例患者(24.6%)出现房颤复发。基于多变量Cox回归分析,每月延迟时间越长,房颤复发风险越高[风险比(HR)1.003(95%置信区间:1.001 - 1.005),p = 0.015]。在持续性房颤患者中这种关联仍然一致(与DAT≤1年相比,HR:1.548 [95%置信区间:1.139 - 2.102],p = 0.016),但在阵发性房颤患者中并非如此。左心房直径≥40mm和女性被确定为房颤复发的独立预测因素。DAT对MACCE发生的总体影响不显著,年龄和血管疾病是独立预测因素。
早期进行导管消融更有利于维持窦性心律,尤其是在持续性房颤患者中。然而,DAT并不影响MACCE的发生率。这些发现支持了向早期消融的模式转变。