Suppr超能文献

探索计划质量:利用计划复杂性定量分析临床适用性与剂量准确性之间的权衡。

Exploring plan quality: using plan complexity to quantitatively analyse the tradeoff between clinical suitability and dosimetric accuracy.

作者信息

Cavinato S, Amico A G, Bettinelli A, Caricato P, Ceroni P, Khouzai B El, Guida F, Paiusco M, Paronetto C, Pivato N, Rossato M A, Sapignoli S, Sepulcri M, Scaggion A

机构信息

Medical Physics Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padova, Italy.

Radiation Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Phys Med. 2025 Aug;136:105026. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.105026. Epub 2025 Jun 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigates how controlling the complexity of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans can quantitatively balance clinical suitability and dosimetric accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty clinical cases treated with VMAT plans were re-optimized to limit plan complexity to varying degrees using Monitor Units (MU) objective and the Aperture Shape Controller (ASC) in the Eclipse TPS. The resulting plans were evaluated based on surrogate measures of plan complexity (single and aggregate complexity metrics), dosimetric accuracy (γ-index passing rate), and clinical suitability (Adjusted Plan Quality Metric).

RESULTS

Stricter MU limits and higher ASC penalties resulted in beam's-eye-view regularization and reduced leaf travel while increasing modulation of gantry speed and dose rate. Limiting plan complexity enhanced dosimetric accuracy, as shown by a higher γ-index passing rate. However, this was accompanied by a moderate reduction in clinical suitability, reflected by a lower Adjusted Plan Quality Metric (APQM%), with variations across treatment sites. Complexity metrics related to MLC apertures were the most significant indicators for characterizing dosimetric accuracy and clinical suitability. An aggregate complexity score was established, demonstrating a monotonic relationship with both dosimetric accuracy and clinical suitability, enabling the assessment of their trade-off.

CONCLUSION

By defining appropriate proxies, clinical suitability and deliverability can be quantitatively balanced through managing plan complexity in VMAT plans. While tailored to this study's clinical routine, the method holds potential for standardizing plan quality assessment and improving VMAT treatment outcomes across diverse clinical settings. Insights gained could contribute to greater consistency and effectiveness in evaluating the overall plan quality in radiation therapy.

摘要

目的

本研究调查如何控制容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)计划的复杂性,以定量平衡临床适用性和剂量准确性。

材料与方法

使用瓦里安直线加速器治疗计划系统(Eclipse TPS)中的监测单位(MU)目标和孔径形状控制器(ASC),对30例采用VMAT计划治疗的临床病例进行重新优化,以不同程度限制计划复杂性。根据计划复杂性的替代指标(单一和总体复杂性指标)、剂量准确性(γ指数通过率)和临床适用性(调整后的计划质量指标)对所得计划进行评估。

结果

更严格的MU限制和更高的ASC惩罚导致射野方向观正则化和叶运动减少,同时增加了机架速度和剂量率的调制。限制计划复杂性提高了剂量准确性,表现为γ指数通过率更高。然而,这伴随着临床适用性的适度降低,表现为调整后的计划质量指标(APQM%)较低,且不同治疗部位存在差异。与多叶准直器孔径相关的复杂性指标是表征剂量准确性和临床适用性的最重要指标。建立了一个总体复杂性评分,显示其与剂量准确性和临床适用性均呈单调关系,从而能够评估它们之间的权衡。

结论

通过定义适当的替代指标,可以通过管理VMAT计划的复杂性来定量平衡临床适用性和可交付性。虽然该方法是针对本研究的临床常规定制的,但该方法有可能使计划质量评估标准化,并改善不同临床环境下的VMAT治疗结果。所获得的见解可能有助于提高放射治疗中评估总体计划质量的一致性和有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验