Brooks Fre'Etta M D, Hussein Mohammad, Lye Jessica, Nelson Christopher L, Mitsuhiro Nakamura, Glenn Mallory C, Diez Patricia, Patel Rushil, Shaw Maddison, Patallo Ileana Silvestre, Barry Miriam, Clark Catharine H, Lehmann Joerg, Kry Stephen F
University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Metrology for Medical Physics, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70113. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70113. Epub 2025 May 29.
To develop a practical framework for creating a diverse set of validated reference plans (varying in complexity) and implement a workflow to introduce beam modeling, calibration, and delivery errors into the reference cohort to test and compare various dosimetry audit methodologies.
Sixteen IMRT and VMAT reference plans were created, using RayStation software, for four phantom geometries based on established credentialing cases from participating Global Harmonization Group (GHG) members. These reference plans were first validated in a multi-ion-chamber phantom. Nine dosimetric errors (perturbations) were introduced into the plans by modifying beam model and/or delivery parameters (MLC-offset, MLC-transmission, leaf-tip-width, PDD, beam calibration, and MLC-position) based on documented community distributions of errors; this produced 144 plans. The dose impact on the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs) was determined, and a range of classifications was developed to determine if the perturbed plan should pass or should fail an audit.
Introducing errors into the reference plans impacted each plan differently. Dose perturbations ranged from <1% to >10% in the mean dose to the CTV and <10% to >30% in the near maximum dose to OAR (D0.03). The 144 plans included clear "acceptable" and "unacceptable" scenarios, with significant changes in dose (relative to baseline reference values), as well as near pass/fail threshold results. Plan complexity was found to have a strong impact on dose deviation, and the mean MLC Gap metric was found to best capture this relationship.
This study presented a framework to develop a set of reference plans and perturbations that can be used to assess and compare various audit and PSQA methodologies. The GHG has developed this framework as part of our ongoing work to test the comparability of their audit systems; this framework supports our work of aligning international dosimetry audits across the globe.
制定一个实用框架,以创建一组多样化的经过验证的参考计划(复杂度各异),并实施一种工作流程,将射束建模、校准和交付误差引入参考队列,以测试和比较各种剂量学审核方法。
使用RayStation软件,基于参与全球协调小组(GHG)成员的既定认证案例,针对四种体模几何形状创建了16个调强放疗(IMRT)和容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)参考计划。这些参考计划首先在多电离室体模中进行了验证。根据已记录的误差群体分布,通过修改射束模型和/或交付参数(多叶准直器偏移、多叶准直器透射、叶尖宽度、百分深度剂量、射束校准和多叶准直器位置),将九种剂量学误差(扰动)引入计划中;这产生了144个计划。确定了对临床靶区(CTV)和危及器官(OAR)的剂量影响,并制定了一系列分类,以确定受扰动的计划是否应通过审核。
将误差引入参考计划对每个计划的影响各不相同。CTV的平均剂量中的剂量扰动范围为<1%至>10%,OAR的近最大剂量(D0.03)中的剂量扰动范围为<10%至>30%。这144个计划包括明确的“可接受”和“不可接受”情况,剂量有显著变化(相对于基线参考值),以及接近通过/未通过阈值的结果。发现计划复杂度对剂量偏差有很大影响,并且发现平均多叶准直器间隙指标最能体现这种关系。
本研究提出了一个框架,用于开发一组参考计划和扰动,可用于评估和比较各种审核和患者安全质量保证(PSQA)方法。全球协调小组已将此框架作为我们正在进行的测试其审核系统可比性工作的一部分进行开发;该框架支持我们在全球范围内协调国际剂量学审核的工作。