Hashem Danya, Al-Taee Lamis A, Mourad Samah Ibrahim, Elhelbawy Nahla Gamaleldin, Ahmed Khaled E, Mahmoud Samah
Department of Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madinah Saudi Arabia.
Department of Conservative & Aesthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 1417, Iraq.
J Dent. 2025 Sep;160:105922. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105922. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
To evaluate the influence of monolithic zirconia brand, thickness, and substrate color on color matching accuracy when optically coupled to abutment substrates.
A total of 180 samples of two brands of monolithic zirconia [Prettau Anterior (PA), Ceramill Zolid FX Multicolor (CZ)] were prepared in three different thicknesses (0.8 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2 mm) with a standardized 10 mm diameter. Color properties of the samples were assessed using spectrophotometry at baseline and after coupling to three substrate types: standard dentin, discolored dentin, and titanium. Color differences (ΔE) were calculated and statistically analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and pairwise comparison (α=0.05).
The brand and material thickness, at baseline and after coupling to different substrate colors, had significant effect on color variations (P < 0.001). CZ consistently exhibited higher color differences than PA across all conditions. Thinner specimens (0.8 mm) demonstrated greater sensitivity to substrate color, and increasing the thickness to 1.5 mm resulted in a reduction in color differences, particularly for CZ formulations. Thinner zirconia restorations (0.8 mm) require careful material selection and substrate matching to mitigate perceptible color shifts.
The accuracy of color matching of monolithic zirconia restorations is significantly influenced by material composition, thickness, and underlying substrate color. CZ demonstrated greater substrate transparency effects compared to PA, emphasizing the critical role of material selection in clinical outcomes.
Clinicians should carefully consider the potential change of the color properties of monolithic zirconia restorations, especially in thin sections and with dark tooth substrate, when color masking is needed.
评估整体式氧化锆的品牌、厚度和基底颜色对与基台基底光学耦合时颜色匹配精度的影响。
制备了两个品牌的整体式氧化锆[Prettau Anterior(PA)、Ceramill Zolid FX Multicolor(CZ)]共180个样本,直径标准化为10 mm,有三种不同厚度(0.8 mm、1.5 mm和2 mm)。使用分光光度法在基线时以及与三种基底类型耦合后评估样本的颜色特性:标准牙本质、变色牙本质和钛。计算颜色差异(ΔE),并通过三因素方差分析和两两比较进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。
在基线时以及与不同基底颜色耦合后,品牌和材料厚度对颜色变化有显著影响(P < 0.001)。在所有条件下,CZ始终比PA表现出更大的颜色差异。较薄的样本(0.8 mm)对基底颜色更敏感,将厚度增加到1.5 mm会导致颜色差异减小,特别是对于CZ配方。较薄的氧化锆修复体(0.8 mm)需要仔细选择材料和匹配基底以减轻可察觉的颜色变化。
整体式氧化锆修复体的颜色匹配精度受材料成分、厚度和底层基底颜色的显著影响。与PA相比,CZ表现出更大的基底透明度效应,强调了材料选择在临床结果中的关键作用。
临床医生在需要颜色遮罩时,应仔细考虑整体式氧化锆修复体颜色特性的潜在变化,尤其是在薄修复体和牙齿基底较深的情况下。