Tabatabaian Farhad, Vora Siddharth, Mirabbasi Shahriar
Department of Oral Health Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Int J Dent. 2025 Jun 19;2025:2004922. doi: 10.1155/ijod/2004922. eCollection 2025.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of ceramic shade, ceramic thickness, and surface treatment on the color match of high-translucency monolithic multilayer zirconia restorations. Seventy-two high-translucency monolithic multilayer zirconia disk specimens with different shades (A2, A3, B2, and B3) and different thicknesses (1, 1.5, and 2 mm) were fabricated, polished, and glazed. CIELab values were measured with a spectrophotometer in the incisal, middle, and cervical regions before and after glazing. ∆ color differences were calculated between polished and glazed specimens (Δ ), between polished specimens and their analogous Vita classical shade tabs as targets (Δ ), and between glazed specimens and the targets (Δ ). The ∆ values were compared with a 50:50% acceptability threshold (∆ = 1.8) to assess color matches. Repeated measures ANOVA, Bonferroni, and 1-sample -tests were used for data analysis ( = 0.05). Mean ∆ values ranged between 1.11 and 2.74 for Δ , between 2.69 and 6.78 for Δ , and between 1.47 and 5.59 for Δ . The overall mean values were 1.82, 4.66, and 3.63 for Δ , Δ , and Δ , respectively. Ceramic shade, ceramic thickness, and surface treatment significantly affected the CIELab values ( < 0.05). All mean ∆ and ∆ values were greater than the threshold ( < 0.05) except for the mean ∆ for the 1.5- and 2-mm-thick, A3 shade, glazed zirconia in the cervical region ( > 0.05). The color match of high-translucency monolithic multilayer zirconia restorations depends on ceramic shade. Additionally, increased ceramic thicknesses (≥1.5 mm) and glazing can improve the color match of these restorations.
本体外研究的目的是评估陶瓷颜色、陶瓷厚度和表面处理对高透明度整体多层氧化锆修复体颜色匹配的影响。制作了72个具有不同颜色(A2、A3、B2和B3)和不同厚度(1、1.5和2毫米)的高透明度整体多层氧化锆圆盘试件,进行抛光和上釉处理。在上釉前后,使用分光光度计在切端、中部和颈部区域测量CIELab值。计算抛光试件和上釉试件之间(Δ )、抛光试件与其类似的Vita经典色标作为目标之间(Δ )以及上釉试件与目标之间(Δ )的颜色差异。将Δ 值与50:50%的可接受阈值(Δ = 1.8)进行比较,以评估颜色匹配情况。采用重复测量方差分析、Bonferroni检验和单样本t检验进行数据分析(α = 0.05)。Δ 的平均Δ 值在1.11至2.74之间,Δ 的平均Δ 值在2.69至6.78之间,Δ 的平均Δ 值在1.47至5.59之间。Δ 、Δ 和Δ 的总体平均值分别为1.82、4.66和3.63。陶瓷颜色、陶瓷厚度和表面处理显著影响CIELab值(P < 0.05)。除了颈部区域1.5毫米和2毫米厚、A3颜色、上釉氧化锆的平均Δ 外,所有平均Δ 和Δ 值均大于阈值(P < 0.05)(P > 0.05)。高透明度整体多层氧化锆修复体的颜色匹配取决于陶瓷颜色。此外,增加陶瓷厚度(≥1.5毫米)和上釉可以改善这些修复体的颜色匹配。