• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于对脓毒症重症患者的脓毒症诱导凝血病进行稳健预测的机器学习模型。

A machine learning model for robust prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in critically ill patients with sepsis.

作者信息

Sun Jia, Zhang Lixin, Gong Zhaotang, Ma Hongling, Wu Dan, Wu Rihan, Siri Guleng

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Baotou Medical College, Baotou, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China.

出版信息

Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jun 6;15:1579558. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1579558. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fcimb.2025.1579558
PMID:40546281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12179180/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is a common disease in patients with sepsis. It denotes higher mortality rates and a poorer prognosis in these patients. This study aimed to develop a practical machine learning (ML) model for the prediction of the risk of SIC in critically ill patients with sepsis.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital database. Sepsis and SIC were defined based on the Sepsis-3 criteria and the criteria developed based on the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), respectively. We compared nine ML models using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in terms of SIC prediction ability. Optimal model selection was based on the superior performance metrics exhibited by the model on the training dataset, the internal validation dataset, and the external validation dataset.

RESULTS

Of the 15,479 patients in MIMIC-IV included in the final cohort, a total of 6,036 (38.9%) patients developed SIC during sepsis. We selected 17 features to construct ML prediction models. The gradient boosting machine (GBM) model was deemed optimal as it achieved high predictive accuracy and reliability across the training, internal, and external validation datasets. The areas under the curve of the GBM model were 0.773 (95%CI = 0.765-0.782) in the training dataset, 0.730 (95%CI = 0.715-0.745) in the internal validation dataset, and 0.966 (95%CI = 0.938-0.994) in the external validation dataset. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values illustrated the prediction results, indicating that total bilirubin, red cell distribution width (RDW), systolic blood pressure (SBP), heparin, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were risk factors for progression to SIC in patients with sepsis.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed an optimal and operable ML model that was able to predict the risk of SIC in septic patients better than the SOFA scoring models.

摘要

引言

脓毒症诱导的凝血病(SIC)是脓毒症患者中的常见病症。它表明这些患者的死亡率更高且预后更差。本研究旨在开发一种实用的机器学习(ML)模型,用于预测重症脓毒症患者发生SIC的风险。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,患者从重症监护医学信息集市IV(MIMIC-IV)数据库和内蒙古自治区人民医院数据库中提取。脓毒症和SIC分别根据Sepsis-3标准和基于国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)制定的标准进行定义。我们使用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分比较了九个ML模型在SIC预测能力方面的表现。最佳模型选择基于模型在训练数据集、内部验证数据集和外部验证数据集上表现出的优越性能指标。

结果

在最终队列纳入的MIMIC-IV中的15479例患者中,共有6036例(38.9%)患者在脓毒症期间发生SIC。我们选择了17个特征来构建ML预测模型。梯度提升机(GBM)模型被认为是最佳模型,因为它在训练、内部和外部验证数据集中均实现了较高的预测准确性和可靠性。GBM模型在训练数据集中的曲线下面积为0.773(95%CI = 0.765 - 0.782),在内部验证数据集中为0.730(95%CI = 0.715 - 0.745),在外部验证数据集中为0.966(95%CI = 0.938 - 0.994)。Shapley值加法解释(SHAP)值说明了预测结果,表明总胆红素、红细胞分布宽度(RDW)、收缩压(SBP)、肝素和血尿素氮(BUN)是脓毒症患者进展为SIC的危险因素。

结论

我们开发了一种最佳且可操作的ML模型,该模型能够比SOFA评分模型更好地预测脓毒症患者发生SIC的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/6d6749e6f3ef/fcimb-15-1579558-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/d8229895b36f/fcimb-15-1579558-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/51ecece44486/fcimb-15-1579558-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/bfd359d659ae/fcimb-15-1579558-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/8f13d18862a1/fcimb-15-1579558-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/4631fda9ad76/fcimb-15-1579558-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/4d0e5f53ea3b/fcimb-15-1579558-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/6d6749e6f3ef/fcimb-15-1579558-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/d8229895b36f/fcimb-15-1579558-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/51ecece44486/fcimb-15-1579558-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/bfd359d659ae/fcimb-15-1579558-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/8f13d18862a1/fcimb-15-1579558-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/4631fda9ad76/fcimb-15-1579558-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/4d0e5f53ea3b/fcimb-15-1579558-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12179180/6d6749e6f3ef/fcimb-15-1579558-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A machine learning model for robust prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in critically ill patients with sepsis.一种用于对脓毒症重症患者的脓毒症诱导凝血病进行稳健预测的机器学习模型。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jun 6;15:1579558. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1579558. eCollection 2025.
2
External validation of a machine learning prediction model for massive blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional study using 880 patients.脊柱转移瘤手术中大量失血的机器学习预测模型的外部验证:一项使用880例患者的多机构研究。
Spine J. 2025 Jul;25(7):1386-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.018. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
3
Ten Machine Learning Models for Predicting Preoperative and Postoperative Coagulopathy in Patients With Trauma: Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测创伤患者术前和术后凝血病的十种机器学习模型:多中心队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 22;27:e66612. doi: 10.2196/66612.
4
Prediction of Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Population Using LightGBM and Cohort Validation of Its Clinical Value: Cross-Sectional and Retrospective Cohort Study.使用LightGBM预测非糖尿病人群的胰岛素抵抗及其临床价值的队列验证:横断面和回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 13;13:e72238. doi: 10.2196/72238.
5
Development of a machine learning model and a web application for predicting neurological outcome at hospital discharge in spinal cord injury patients.开发用于预测脊髓损伤患者出院时神经功能结局的机器学习模型和网络应用程序。
Spine J. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.005.
6
Interpretable machine learning prediction model for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease.外周动脉疾病患者主要不良心血管事件的可解释机器学习预测模型
J Vasc Surg. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.022.
7
The Predictive Value of Red Cell Distribution Width for the Risk of Sepsis in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.红细胞分布宽度对急性胰腺炎患者脓毒症风险的预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究
Pancreas. 2025 Jul 1;54(6):e562-e570. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002475.
8
Mortality Risk Prediction in Patients With Antimelanoma Differentiation-Associated, Gene 5 Antibody-Positive, Dermatomyositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Algorithm Development and Validation.抗黑色素瘤分化相关基因5抗体阳性、皮肌炎相关间质性肺疾病患者的死亡风险预测:算法开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e62836. doi: 10.2196/62836.
9
Development of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Postoperative Delirium in Older Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: Retrospective Study.基于机器学习的老年重症监护病房患者术后谵妄预测模型的开发:一项回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 19;27:e67258. doi: 10.2196/67258.
10
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.用于脓毒症诱导性凝血病 ICU 患者 28 天死亡率早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01593-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between coagulopathy score and survival in critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis and sepsis: a retrospective study.肝硬化合并脓毒症重症患者凝血功能障碍评分与生存的关系:一项回顾性研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10848-z.
2
Heparin in sepsis: current clinical findings and possible mechanisms.脓毒症中的肝素:当前临床研究结果及可能机制
Front Immunol. 2024 Dec 6;15:1495260. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1495260. eCollection 2024.
3
Relationship between serum sodium level and sepsis-induced coagulopathy.
血清钠水平与脓毒症诱导的凝血病之间的关系。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 8;10:1324369. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1324369. eCollection 2023.
4
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.用于脓毒症诱导性凝血病 ICU 患者 28 天死亡率早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01593-7.
5
Association of Blood Glucose Variability with Sepsis-Related Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Morbidity and Mortality.血糖变异性与脓毒症相关的弥散性血管内凝血发病率及死亡率的关联
J Inflamm Res. 2022 Nov 30;15:6505-6516. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S383053. eCollection 2022.
6
Early prophylactic anticoagulation with heparin alleviates mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: a retrospective analysis from the MIMIC-IV database.早期使用肝素进行预防性抗凝可降低脓毒症重症患者的死亡率:一项来自MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性分析
Burns Trauma. 2022 Sep 23;10:tkac029. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkac029. eCollection 2022.
7
Mechanisms and modulation of sepsis-induced immune dysfunction in children.脓毒症引起的儿童免疫功能障碍的机制与调节。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Jan;91(2):447-453. doi: 10.1038/s41390-021-01879-8. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
8
Predictive value of red blood cell distribution width in septic shock patients with thrombocytopenia: A retrospective study using machine learning.基于机器学习的血小板减少症脓毒性休克患者红细胞分布宽度的预测价值:一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Dec;35(12):e24053. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24053. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
9
Opening the Black Box: The Promise and Limitations of Explainable Machine Learning in Cardiology.揭开黑箱:可解释机器学习在心脏病学中的前景与局限。
Can J Cardiol. 2022 Feb;38(2):204-213. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
10
Red Cell Distribution Width as a Prognostic Factor and Its Comparison with Lactate in Patients with Sepsis.红细胞分布宽度作为脓毒症患者的一个预后因素及其与乳酸的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 14;11(8):1474. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081474.