• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于预测创伤患者术前和术后凝血病的十种机器学习模型:多中心队列研究

Ten Machine Learning Models for Predicting Preoperative and Postoperative Coagulopathy in Patients With Trauma: Multicenter Cohort Study.

作者信息

Xiong Xiaojuan, Fu Hong, Xu Bo, Wei Wang, Zhou Mi, Hu Peng, Ren Yunqin, Mao Qingxiang

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing Emergency Medical Center, Chongqing University Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 22;27:e66612. doi: 10.2196/66612.

DOI:10.2196/66612
PMID:39841523
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799815/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent research has revealed the potential value of machine learning (ML) models in improving prognostic prediction for patients with trauma. ML can enhance predictions and identify which factors contribute the most to posttraumatic mortality. However, no studies have explored the risk factors, complications, and risk prediction of preoperative and postoperative traumatic coagulopathy (PPTIC) in patients with trauma.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to help clinicians implement timely and appropriate interventions to reduce the incidence of PPTIC and related complications, thereby lowering in-hospital mortality and disability rates for patients with trauma.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 13,235 patients with trauma from 4 medical centers, including medical histories, laboratory results, and hospitalization complications. We developed 10 ML models in Python (Python Software Foundation) to predict PPTIC based on preoperative indicators. Data from 10,023 Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care patients were divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets, with 3212 patients from 3 other centers used for external validation. Model performance was assessed with 5-fold cross-validation, bootstrapping, Brier score, and Shapley additive explanation values.

RESULTS

Univariate logistic regression identified PPTIC risk factors as (1) prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio; (2) decreased levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cells, calcium, and sodium; (3) lower admission diastolic blood pressure; (4) elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels; (5) admission heart rate; and (6) emergency surgery and perioperative transfusion. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that patients with PPTIC faced significantly higher risks of sepsis (1.75-fold), heart failure (1.5-fold), delirium (3.08-fold), abnormal coagulation (3.57-fold), tracheostomy (2.76-fold), mortality (2.19-fold), and urinary tract infection (1.95-fold), along with longer hospital and intensive care unit stays. Random forest was the most effective ML model for predicting PPTIC, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.91, an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.89, accuracy of 0.84, sensitivity of 0.80, specificity of 0.88, precision of 0.88, F-score of 0.84, and Brier score of 0.13 in external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

Key PPTIC risk factors include (1) prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and international normalized ratio; (2) low levels of hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cells, calcium, and sodium; (3) low diastolic blood pressure; (4) elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels; (5) admission heart rate; and (6) the need for emergency surgery and transfusion. PPTIC is associated with severe complications and extended hospital stays. Among the ML models, the random forest model was the most effective predictor.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300078097; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=211051.

摘要

背景

最近的研究揭示了机器学习(ML)模型在改善创伤患者预后预测方面的潜在价值。ML可以增强预测能力,并确定哪些因素对创伤后死亡率的影响最大。然而,尚无研究探讨创伤患者术前和术后创伤性凝血病(PPTIC)的危险因素、并发症及风险预测。

目的

本研究旨在帮助临床医生实施及时、恰当的干预措施,以降低PPTIC的发生率及相关并发症,从而降低创伤患者的院内死亡率和残疾率。

方法

我们分析了来自4个医疗中心的13235例创伤患者的数据,包括病史、实验室检查结果及住院并发症。我们在Python(Python软件基金会)中开发了10个ML模型,以根据术前指标预测PPTIC。来自重症监护医学信息集市的10023例患者的数据被分为训练集(70%)和测试集(30%),另外3个中心的3212例患者用于外部验证。通过5折交叉验证、自助法、Brier评分和Shapley相加解释值评估模型性能。

结果

单因素逻辑回归确定PPTIC的危险因素为:(1)活化部分凝血活酶时间、凝血酶原时间和国际标准化比值延长;(2)血红蛋白、血细胞比容、红细胞、钙和钠水平降低;(3)入院时舒张压降低;(4)丙氨酸氨基转移酶和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶水平升高;(5)入院心率;(6)急诊手术和围手术期输血。多因素逻辑回归显示,PPTIC患者发生脓毒症(1.75倍)、心力衰竭(1.5倍)、谵妄(3.08倍)、凝血异常(3.57倍)、气管切开(2.76倍)、死亡(2.19倍)和尿路感染(1.95倍)的风险显著更高,住院时间和重症监护病房停留时间更长。随机森林是预测PPTIC最有效的ML模型,在外部验证中,受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.91,精确召回率曲线下面积为0.89,准确率为0.84,灵敏度为0.80,特异度为0.88,精确率为0.88,F值为0.84,Brier评分为0.13。

结论

PPTIC的关键危险因素包括:(1)活化部分凝血活酶时间、凝血酶原时间和国际标准化比值延长;(2)血红蛋白、血细胞比容、红细胞、钙和钠水平低;(3)舒张压低;(4)丙氨酸氨基转移酶和天冬氨酸氨基转移酶水平升高;(5)入院心率;(6)急诊手术和输血需求。PPTIC与严重并发症和延长住院时间相关。在ML模型中,随机森林模型是最有效的预测模型。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR2300078097;https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=211051 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/9e2407f624ce/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/5b13044ea097/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/978610251a4f/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/a2a4e5625e72/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/3699e117aaae/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/9e2407f624ce/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/5b13044ea097/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/978610251a4f/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/a2a4e5625e72/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/3699e117aaae/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98bc/11799815/9e2407f624ce/jmir_v27i1e66612_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Ten Machine Learning Models for Predicting Preoperative and Postoperative Coagulopathy in Patients With Trauma: Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测创伤患者术前和术后凝血病的十种机器学习模型:多中心队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 22;27:e66612. doi: 10.2196/66612.
2
Development of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Postoperative Delirium in Older Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: Retrospective Study.基于机器学习的老年重症监护病房患者术后谵妄预测模型的开发:一项回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 19;27:e67258. doi: 10.2196/67258.
3
External validation of a machine learning prediction model for massive blood loss during surgery for spinal metastases: a multi-institutional study using 880 patients.脊柱转移瘤手术中大量失血的机器学习预测模型的外部验证:一项使用880例患者的多机构研究。
Spine J. 2025 Jul;25(7):1386-1399. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.03.018. Epub 2025 Mar 27.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Interpretable machine learning prediction model for major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral artery disease.外周动脉疾病患者主要不良心血管事件的可解释机器学习预测模型
J Vasc Surg. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.022.
6
Evaluation of acute traumatic coagulopathy in pediatric trauma patients.小儿创伤患者急性创伤性凝血病的评估
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Jun;31(6):548-555. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2025.28787.
7
Development of a machine learning model and a web application for predicting neurological outcome at hospital discharge in spinal cord injury patients.开发用于预测脊髓损伤患者出院时神经功能结局的机器学习模型和网络应用程序。
Spine J. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.005.
8
Prediction of Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Population Using LightGBM and Cohort Validation of Its Clinical Value: Cross-Sectional and Retrospective Cohort Study.使用LightGBM预测非糖尿病人群的胰岛素抵抗及其临床价值的队列验证:横断面和回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 13;13:e72238. doi: 10.2196/72238.
9
Mortality Risk Prediction in Patients With Antimelanoma Differentiation-Associated, Gene 5 Antibody-Positive, Dermatomyositis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Algorithm Development and Validation.抗黑色素瘤分化相关基因5抗体阳性、皮肌炎相关间质性肺疾病患者的死亡风险预测:算法开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 5;27:e62836. doi: 10.2196/62836.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods.TRIPOD+AI 声明:报告使用回归或机器学习方法的临床预测模型的更新指南。
BMJ. 2024 Apr 16;385:e078378. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378.
2
Predicting the complexity and mortality of polytrauma patients with machine learning models.运用机器学习模型预测多发伤患者的复杂性和死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 9;14(1):8302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58830-0.
3
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.
《欧洲创伤后大出血及凝血功能障碍管理指南》第六版
Crit Care. 2023 Mar 1;27(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04327-7.
4
Machine learning in the coagulation and hemostasis arena: an overview and evaluation of methods, review of literature, and future directions.凝血与止血领域的机器学习:方法概述与评估、文献综述及未来方向
J Thromb Haemost. 2023 Apr;21(4):728-743. doi: 10.1016/j.jtha.2022.12.019. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
5
STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2021:加强外科学队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究报告规范。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106165. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106165. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
6
Pathophysiology of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy.创伤性凝血病的病理生理学。
Transfus Med Rev. 2021 Oct;35(4):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
7
Interpretable prediction of 3-year all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure caused by coronary heart disease based on machine learning and SHAP.基于机器学习和SHAP对冠心病所致心力衰竭患者3年全因死亡率的可解释预测
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Oct;137:104813. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104813. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
8
Machine learning-based prediction of in-hospital mortality using admission laboratory data: A retrospective, single-site study using electronic health record data.基于机器学习的入院实验室数据预测住院死亡率:一项使用电子健康记录数据的回顾性单站点研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246640. eCollection 2021.
9
Dynamic effects of calcium on in vivo and ex vivo platelet behavior after trauma.创伤后钙对体内和体外血小板行为的动态影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Nov;89(5):871-879. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002820.
10
An Introduction to Machine Learning.机器学习简介。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Apr;107(4):871-885. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1796. Epub 2020 Mar 3.