Mobushar Jehangir Afzal, Shahzad Anjum, Mumtaz Bushra, Naeem Iqra, Zafar Adnan Ahmad, Jamil Muhammad Irfan, Shah Syed Safiullah, Awais Muhammad, Ahmed Adeel
Medicine, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Internal Medicine, Services Hospital Lahore, Lahore, PAK.
Cureus. 2025 May 22;17(5):e84649. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84649. eCollection 2025 May.
Background Despite the rising burden of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cognitive assessment is not routinely incorporated into dialysis care, particularly in low-resource settings. This study aimed to assess the prevalence, severity, and predictors of cognitive impairment among patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary dialysis center from December 2023 to May 2024. Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing hemodialysis for six months or more were enrolled. Exclusion criteria included neurological disorders, severe psychiatric illness, or medications affecting cognition. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Urdu-validated Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), with scores <26 indicating impairment. Domain-wise deficits were classified using 1.5 standard deviation below the normative mean. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariable logistic regression. Results Out of 198 hemodialysis patients, 116 (58.6%) exhibited cognitive impairment. Severity was categorized as mild in 79 (39.9%), moderate in 31 (15.7%), and severe in eight (4.0%) patients. Multidomain impairment was present in 108 (54.5%), while 18 (9.1%) had single-domain and 72 (36.4%) had no impairment. Older age (p<0.001), lower education (p<0.001), low socioeconomic status (SES) (p=0.045), and longer dialysis duration (p<0.001) were significantly associated with cognitive impairment. Biochemical predictors included lower hemoglobin and albumin (p=0.018 and p=0.034), and higher phosphate and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) (p=0.001 and p=0.042). On regression analysis, age (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.088, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.031-1.149), education ≤12 years (AOR=10.423, 95% CI=1.199-90.633), low SES (AOR=9.075, 95% CI=1.473-55.916), dialysis duration (AOR=1.047, 95% CI=1.010-1.085), and biochemical markers remained significant. Conclusion Cognitive impairment, particularly multidomain, is highly prevalent among hemodialysis patients and frequently unrecognized. Integration of cognitive screening into routine nephrology care is essential to enable early intervention and improve long-term patient outcomes.
尽管终末期肾病(ESRD)的负担不断加重,但认知评估并未常规纳入透析护理中,尤其是在资源匮乏的环境中。本研究旨在评估维持性血液透析患者认知障碍的患病率、严重程度及预测因素。方法:于2023年12月至2024年5月在一家三级透析中心进行了一项描述性横断面研究。纳入年龄≥18岁、接受血液透析6个月或更长时间的患者。排除标准包括神经系统疾病、严重精神疾病或影响认知的药物。使用经乌尔都语验证的蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评估认知功能,得分<26分表明存在认知障碍。各领域的缺陷根据低于正常均值1.5个标准差进行分类。统计分析包括卡方检验、t检验和多变量逻辑回归。结果:在198例血液透析患者中,116例(58.6%)存在认知障碍。严重程度分类为轻度79例(39.9%)、中度31例(15.7%)、重度8例(4.0%)。108例(54.5%)存在多领域障碍,18例(9.1%)存在单领域障碍,72例(36.4%)无障碍。年龄较大(p<0.001)、教育程度较低(p<0.001)、社会经济地位(SES)较低(p=0.045)和透析时间较长(p<0.001)与认知障碍显著相关。生化预测因素包括血红蛋白和白蛋白较低(p=0.018和p=0.034),以及磷酸盐和完整甲状旁腺激素(iPTH)较高(p=0.001和p=0.042)。回归分析显示,年龄(调整优势比(AOR)=1.088,95%置信区间(CI)=1.031-1.149)、教育程度≤12年(AOR=10.423,95%CI=1.199-90.633)、低SES(AOR=9.075,95%CI=1.473-55.916)、透析时间(AOR=1.047,95%CI=1.010-1.085)和生化标志物仍具有显著性。结论:认知障碍,尤其是多领域认知障碍,在血液透析患者中非常普遍且常常未被识别。将认知筛查纳入常规肾脏病护理对于实现早期干预和改善患者长期预后至关重要。