• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值及炎症标志物在结直肠癌中的预后价值

Prognostic value of hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio and inflammation markers in colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Zeynelgil Esra, Duzkopru Yakup, Kocanoglu Abdulkadir, Karakaya Serdar

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Ataturk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06100, Türkiye.

Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara 06170, Türkiye.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):106603. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106603.

DOI:10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106603
PMID:40547180
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12179935/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio (HRR) is a recently introduced, easily accessible marker that provides insights into inflammation and the tumor vascular microenvironment. It has been suggested to have prognostic value for overall survival in various types of cancer, including urothelial carcinoma, lung cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. It has not yet been sufficiently investigated in colorectal cancers (CRC).

AIM

To investigate the prognostic significance of the HRR and other inflammation-based hematological markers in patients with metastatic CRC. Additionally, the study evaluated the impact of surgical interventions, particularly metastasectomy, and multiple clinical and laboratory parameters on overall survival. By identifying low-cost, accessible prognostic indicators, this research seeks to support clinicians in optimizing treatment strategies and risk stratification for patients with CRC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients diagnosed with CRC between January 2020 and December 2024 were analyzed. The impact of HRR in conjunction with inflammatory markers and a total of 22 different clinical and laboratory parameters on overall survival were evaluated using univariate Cox regression and a multivariate model. Survival curves were visualized using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients with CRC were included in the study. The median age was 60 years, and 61.9% presented with de novo metastasis. In the receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve analysis performed to determine the optimal cutoff, the values were found to be 6.10 for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ( = 0.036), 18.85 for platelet-to-red cell distribution width ratio ( = 0.028), and 10.87 for platelet distribution width-to-lymphocyte ratio ( = 0.028). For neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, HRR, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9, an optimal cutoff could not be determined using the receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve analysis. Therefore, the median values were adopted as the cutoffs (3.09, 835.96, 177.50, 0.380, 0.824, and 21.6, respectively). Univariate analysis identified male gender ( = 0.045), being under 65 years of age ( = 0.001), history of metastasectomy ( = 0.001), low serum CEA level ( = 0.010), low PLR ( = 0.024), low SII ( = 0.010), and high HRR ( = 0.025) as favorable prognostic factors for overall survival. In the multivariate model, being under 65 years of age [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-2.39, = 0.025], metastasectomy (HR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.29-0.85, = 0.011), CEA (HR = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.0-2.28, = 0.048), and PLR (HR = 1.63, 95%CI: 1.09-2.44, = 0.018) emerged as independent prognostic factors for overall survival, whereas gender, SII, and HRR did not retain statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, low HRR alone was a prognostic indicator. However, when modelled with other inflammatory and clinical parameters, it did not provide a sufficiently strong marker feature.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d6d/12179935/7931673d98ef/wjgo-17-6-106603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d6d/12179935/7931673d98ef/wjgo-17-6-106603-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d6d/12179935/7931673d98ef/wjgo-17-6-106603-g001.jpg
摘要

背景

血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值(HRR)是一种最近引入的、易于获取的标志物,可用于深入了解炎症和肿瘤血管微环境。已有研究表明,它对包括尿路上皮癌、肺癌和肝细胞癌在内的多种癌症的总生存期具有预后价值。但在结直肠癌(CRC)中尚未得到充分研究。

目的

探讨HRR及其他基于炎症的血液学标志物在转移性CRC患者中的预后意义。此外,该研究评估了手术干预,特别是转移灶切除术,以及多个临床和实验室参数对总生存期的影响。通过识别低成本、易获取的预后指标,本研究旨在支持临床医生优化CRC患者的治疗策略和风险分层。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,分析了2020年1月至2024年12月期间诊断为CRC的患者。使用单变量Cox回归和多变量模型评估HRR与炎症标志物以及总共22个不同临床和实验室参数对总生存期的影响。使用Kaplan-Meier分析可视化生存曲线。

结果

该研究共纳入155例CRC患者。中位年龄为60岁,61.9%的患者初诊时即有转移。在用于确定最佳临界值的受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积分析中,癌胚抗原(CEA)的值为6.10(P = 0.036),血小板与红细胞分布宽度比值为18.85(P = 0.028),血小板分布宽度与淋巴细胞比值为10.87(P = 0.028)。对于中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、全身免疫炎症指数(SII)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值、HRR和糖类抗原19-9,使用受试者工作特征-曲线下面积分析无法确定最佳临界值。因此,采用中位数值作为临界值(分别为3.09、835.96、177.50、0.380、0.824和21.6)。单变量分析确定男性(P = 0.045)、年龄小于65岁(P = 0.001)、有转移灶切除术史(P = 0.001)、血清CEA水平低(P = 0.010)、PLR低(P = 0.024)、SII低(P = 0.010)和HRR高(P = 0.025)是总生存期的有利预后因素。在多变量模型中,年龄小于65岁[风险比(HR)= 1.59,95%置信区间(CI):1.06 - 2.39,P = 0.025]、转移灶切除术(HR = 0.49,95%CI:0.29 - 0.85,P = 0.011)、CEA(HR = 1.51,95%CI:1.0 - 2.28,P = 0.048)和PLR(HR = 1.63,95%CI:1.09 - 2.44,P = 0.018)成为总生存期的独立预后因素,而性别、SII和HRR未保留统计学意义。

结论

总之,单独低HRR是一个预后指标。然而,当与其他炎症和临床参数进行建模时,它并未提供足够强大的标志物特征。

相似文献

1
Prognostic value of hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio and inflammation markers in colorectal cancer.血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值及炎症标志物在结直肠癌中的预后价值
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):106603. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106603.
2
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
3
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
4
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
Prognostic value of hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值在癌症中的预后价值:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Biomark Med. 2022 Apr;16(6):473-482. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2021-0577. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2025.2025年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Jan-Feb;75(1):10-45. doi: 10.3322/caac.21871. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
2
Prognostic value and clinicopathological significance of pre-and post-treatment systemic immune-inflammation index in colorectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis.结直肠癌患者治疗前后全身免疫炎症指数的预后价值及临床病理意义:一项荟萃分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan 13;23(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03662-z.
3
NCCN guideline concordance in colon and rectal cancer patients within a comprehensive health system.
综合医疗系统中结肠癌和直肠癌患者的NCCN指南一致性
Am J Surg. 2025 Feb;240:116114. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116114. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
4
Cancer treatments: Past, present, and future.癌症治疗:过去、现在和未来。
Cancer Genet. 2024 Aug;286-287:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
5
MAPK signaling pathway-based glioma subtypes, machine-learning risk model, and key hub proteins identification.基于 MAPK 信号通路的脑胶质瘤亚型、机器学习风险模型和关键枢纽蛋白鉴定。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 4;13(1):19055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45774-0.
6
Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Colorectal Cancer: An Overview.氧化应激、炎症与结直肠癌:概述
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Apr 9;12(4):901. doi: 10.3390/antiox12040901.
7
Prognostic Significance of Hemoglobin/Prognostic Nutritional Index and Hemoglobin/Red Blood Cell Distribution in Rectal Cancer.血红蛋白/预后营养指数和血红蛋白/红细胞分布在直肠癌中的预后意义。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Feb;34(2):128-134. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2022.22203.
8
A Pan-Cancer Bioinformatic Analysis of RAD51 Regarding the Values for Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapeutic Prediction.关于RAD51在诊断、预后和治疗预测价值的泛癌生物信息学分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 10;12:858756. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.858756. eCollection 2022.
9
Chemotherapy (doublet or triplet) plus targeted therapy by RAS status as conversion therapy in colorectal cancer patients with initially unresectable liver-only metastases. The UNICANCER PRODIGE-14 randomised clinical trial.根据 RAS 状态,对初始不可切除的肝转移结直肠癌患者行化疗(双联或三联)加靶向治疗作为转化治疗。UNICANCER PRODIGE-14 随机临床试验。
Br J Cancer. 2022 May;126(9):1264-1270. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01644-y. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
10
Compare the Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of MLR, NLR and PLR in CRC Patients.比较 MLR、NLR 和 PLR 在 CRC 患者中的诊断和预后价值。
Clin Lab. 2021 Sep 1;67(9). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.201130.