• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

综合医疗系统中结肠癌和直肠癌患者的NCCN指南一致性

NCCN guideline concordance in colon and rectal cancer patients within a comprehensive health system.

作者信息

Robinson Tyler P, Kaiser Kristen, Lark Meghan, Ruedinger Brian, Robb Bruce W, Morgan Teryn, Park Seho, Schleyer Titus K L, Haggstrom David A, Mohanty Sanjay

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2025 Feb;240:116114. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116114. Epub 2024 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116114
PMID:39671967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11745911/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Comprehensive Cancer Care Network (NCCN) provides recommendations for patients with colorectal cancer. Concordance with evidence-based guidelines improves outcomes. Our objectives were to 1) examine rates of guideline non-concordance in a large vertically integrated health system; 2) examine factors associated with non-concordant care, and 3) identify geographical patterns of non-concordant care.

METHODS

Colorectal cancer patients were identified from a single-state 16 hospital health-system cancer registry diagnosed between 2011 and 2021. We defined major (MAJ) and minor (MIN) quality indicators of guideline-concordance based on NCCN guidelines. Regression methods were used to identify predictors of major quality criteria non-concordance. County-level mapping was used to identify geographical locations of the highest rates of non-concordance.

RESULTS

Overall, 2324 patients with colon and rectal cancer were analyzed. There was a complete guideline concordance (an absence of guideline non-concordance) rate of 24.7​% (n ​= ​573), MIN only guideline non-concordance rate of 63.3​% (n ​= ​1471), and MAJ non-concordance rate of 12.4​% (n ​= ​280). Predictors of MAJ non-concordance for colon cancer were stage, >1 Charleson-Deyo Score, >60 days from diagnosis to treatment, and >1 hospital network used for care. Predictors of MAJ non-concordance for rectal cancer were >60 days from diagnosis to treatment, and >1 facility used for care. Marion county had the highest rates of non-concordance for colon and rectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

The majority of colon and rectal cancer patients in a large health system received guideline concordant major quality indicators, however 12​% of patients do not. An identifiable geographical location with the highest rates of non-concordance and its associated factors serves as a target for future quality improvement.

摘要

背景

美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)为结直肠癌患者提供相关建议。遵循循证指南可改善治疗结果。我们的目标是:1)在一个大型垂直整合医疗系统中检查指南不遵循率;2)研究与不遵循治疗相关的因素;3)确定不遵循治疗的地理模式。

方法

从一个单州16家医院的医疗系统癌症登记处中识别出2011年至2021年间诊断的结直肠癌患者。我们根据NCCN指南定义了指南遵循的主要(MAJ)和次要(MIN)质量指标。采用回归方法确定主要质量标准不遵循的预测因素。利用县级地图确定不遵循率最高的地理位置。

结果

总体而言,共分析了2324例结肠癌和直肠癌患者。完全遵循指南(不存在指南不遵循情况)的比例为24.7%(n = 573),仅存在次要不遵循情况的比例为63.3%(n = 1471),主要不遵循情况的比例为12.4%(n = 280)。结肠癌主要不遵循的预测因素为分期、Charlson-Deyo评分>1、从诊断到治疗的时间>60天以及接受治疗所使用的医院网络>1个。直肠癌主要不遵循的预测因素为从诊断到治疗的时间>60天以及接受治疗所使用的机构>1个。马里恩县的结肠癌和直肠癌不遵循率最高。

结论

在一个大型医疗系统中,大多数结肠癌和直肠癌患者接受了符合指南的主要质量指标治疗,然而仍有12%的患者未达到。确定不遵循率最高的地理位置及其相关因素可作为未来质量改进的目标。

相似文献

1
NCCN guideline concordance in colon and rectal cancer patients within a comprehensive health system.综合医疗系统中结肠癌和直肠癌患者的NCCN指南一致性
Am J Surg. 2025 Feb;240:116114. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116114. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Are Quality Scores in the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System Associated With Outcomes After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery?医疗补助与医疗照顾服务中心基于绩效的激励支付系统中的质量评分与门诊骨科手术后的结果相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1107-1116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003033. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
7
Do Patients of Different Levels of Affluence Receive Different Care for Pediatric Osteosarcomas? One Institution's Experience.不同富裕程度的患者在小儿骨肉瘤治疗上是否得到不同的护理?一家机构的经验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):748-758. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003299. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
8
Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer operated for cure.针对接受根治性手术的直肠癌患者的术后辅助化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004078. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004078.pub2.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Total neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for proficient mismatch repair or microsatellite stable locally advanced rectal cancer.错配修复功能缺陷或微卫星稳定的局部晚期直肠癌的全新辅助免疫化疗
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 20;16:1611386. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1611386. eCollection 2025.
2
Prognostic value of hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio and inflammation markers in colorectal cancer.血红蛋白与红细胞分布宽度比值及炎症标志物在结直肠癌中的预后价值
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2025 Jun 15;17(6):106603. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106603.
3
[Postsurgical follow-up and long-term monitoring of colorectal cancer : Radiology as a key component].[结直肠癌术后随访与长期监测:放射学作为关键组成部分]
Radiologie (Heidelb). 2025 Jun;65(6):436-442. doi: 10.1007/s00117-025-01435-z. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
4
Ongoing Failure to Deliver Guideline-Concordant Care for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.持续未能为胰腺癌患者提供符合指南的治疗。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 7;17(2):170. doi: 10.3390/cancers17020170.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors associated with failure to operate and its impact on survival in early-stage pancreatic cancer.与早期胰腺癌手术失败相关的因素及其对生存的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;128(4):540-548. doi: 10.1002/jso.27357. Epub 2023 May 27.
2
Watch and wait after neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: comparison of outcomes in patients with and without a complete response at first reassessment in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD).直肠癌新辅助治疗后观察等待:国际观察等待数据库(IWWD)中首次重新评估时完全缓解与无完全缓解患者结局的比较。
Br J Surg. 2023 May 16;110(6):676-684. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad051.
3
Hospital Designations and Their Impact on Guideline-Concordant Care and Survival in Pancreatic Cancer. Do They Matter?医院分类及其对胰腺癌指南一致护理和生存的影响。它们重要吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4377-4387. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13308-7. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
4
Colonoscopy, imaging, and carcinoembryonic antigen: Comparison of guideline adherence to surveillance strategies in patients who underwent resection of colorectal cancer - A systematic review and meta-analysis.结肠镜检查、影像学检查和癌胚抗原:接受结直肠癌切除患者的监测策略指南依从性比较——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;47:101910. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2023.101910. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Nonadherence to Multimodality Cancer Treatment Guidelines in the United States.美国癌症多模式治疗指南的不依从情况。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar 8;7(5):100938. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100938. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
6
Guideline adherence and implementation of tumor board therapy recommendations for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.胃肠道肿瘤患者肿瘤委员会治疗建议的依从性和实施情况。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Mar;149(3):1231-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-03991-6. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
7
What's the magic number? Impact of time to initiation of treatment for rectal cancer.神奇数字是多少?直肠癌治疗开始时间的影响。
Surgery. 2022 May;171(5):1185-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.032. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
8
Discussion.讨论。
Surgery. 2022 Jan;171(1):118. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.047. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
9
Impact of Treatment Coordination on Overall Survival in Rectal Cancer.治疗协调对直肠癌总生存的影响。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2021 Sep;20(3):187-196. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
10
The impact of postoperative complications and delay of adjuvant chemotherapy on oncological outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.术后并发症和辅助化疗延迟对结直肠癌患者肿瘤学结局的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2021 May;23(5):1132-1140. doi: 10.1111/codi.15538. Epub 2021 Feb 9.