Tung Wei-Shao, Eslam Pour Aidin, Sieberer Johannes, Donnelley Claire A, Tommasini Steven M, Wiznia Daniel H
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
World J Orthop. 2025 Jun 18;16(6):107292. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.107292.
Certain implant combinations change leg length and offset in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Poor restoration of leg biomechanics is a frequently cited reason for patient dissatisfaction following primary THA. A pure high-offset stem should provide direct lateralization without affecting femoral length when compared to a standard stem. However, clinical experience with preoperative planning software based on computed tomography-based three-dimensional-models reveals that using pure high-offset stems in THA may cause a difference between expected (no change in femoral length) and actual (small increase) in postoperative femoral length.
To elucidate the causes of these femoral length discrepancies using preoperative planning software.
Preoperative templating for 43 robotic-assisted THAs, optimizing acetabular size and orientation, center of rotation, stem size and offset, and prosthetic head diameter were obtained. The preoperative planning software was used to calculate differences between preoperative and postoperative femoral length for standard and pure high-offset stems, unique to each patient.
Whilst the increase in femoral length between standard and high-offset stems was not significant ( = 0.93), 35 femurs (81.4%) experienced a 1-mm increase, and 3 (7.0%) experienced a 2-mm increase in femoral length while using high-offset stem compared to the standard stem. The incidence of femoral length increase was lower for patients with shorter femurs (18/22; 81.8%) compared to patients with longer femurs (20/21; 95.2%).
When pure high-offset stems were used in preoperative planning software, we demonstrated an unexpected increase in leg length between 1-2-mm in 88.4% of patients. This unexpected increase in femoral length is due to a function of the preoperative planning software's planned stem alignment with the anatomical axis, and not an inherent fault in the stem design. With expanding accessibility of robotic-assisted THA platforms, all potential sources of postoperative leg length discrepancy should be identified during preoperative templating and necessary alterations to the surgical plan should be made to accommodate this unexpected difference when using a pure high-offset stem.
在初次全髋关节置换术(THA)中,某些植入物组合会改变下肢长度和偏心距。下肢生物力学恢复不佳是初次全髋关节置换术后患者不满的常见原因。与标准柄相比,纯高偏心距柄应能实现直接外移,而不影响股骨长度。然而,基于计算机断层扫描三维模型的术前规划软件的临床经验表明,在THA中使用纯高偏心距柄可能会导致术后股骨长度在预期(股骨长度无变化)和实际(小幅增加)之间存在差异。
使用术前规划软件阐明这些股骨长度差异的原因。
对43例机器人辅助THA进行术前模板测量,优化髋臼尺寸和方向、旋转中心、柄尺寸和偏心距以及假体头直径。使用术前规划软件计算标准柄和纯高偏心距柄术前和术后股骨长度的差异,每个患者均不同。
虽然标准柄和高偏心距柄之间的股骨长度增加不显著( = 0.93),但与标准柄相比,使用高偏心距柄时,35个股骨(81.4%)的股骨长度增加了1毫米,3个股骨(7.0%)增加了2毫米。股骨较短的患者(18/22;81.8%)股骨长度增加的发生率低于股骨较长的患者(20/21;95.2%)。
当在术前规划软件中使用纯高偏心距柄时,我们发现88.4%的患者下肢长度意外增加了1 - 2毫米。这种股骨长度的意外增加是由于术前规划软件计划的柄与解剖轴对齐的功能,而非柄设计的固有缺陷。随着机器人辅助THA平台的可及性不断提高,应在术前模板测量期间识别术后下肢长度差异的所有潜在来源,并在使用纯高偏心距柄时对手术计划进行必要调整,以适应这种意外差异。