Suppr超能文献

全髋关节置换术中假体或骨撞击更常见:术前动态分析。

Does Prosthetic or Bony Impingement Occur More Often in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Dynamic Preoperative Analysis.

机构信息

Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, New York, NY.

Corin Group, Cirencester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2501-2506. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.009. Epub 2020 May 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Impingement is a leading cause for instability resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Impingement can be prosthetic, bony, or soft tissue. The purpose of this study is to investigate, using a virtual simulation, whether bony or prosthetic impingement presents first in well-positioned THAs.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients requiring THA were planned for a ceramic-on-poly cementless construct using dynamic planning software. Cups were orientated at 45° inclination and 25° anteversion when standing. Femoral components and neck lengths were positioned to reproduce native anteversion and match contralateral leg length and offset. The type and location of impingement was then recorded with recreation of anterior and posterior impingement during standard and extreme ranges of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

In standard ROM, flexion produced both prosthetic and bony impingement and extension resulted in prosthetic impingement in models with lipped liners. In extreme ROM, anterior impingement was 78% bony in 32-mm articulations, and 88% bony in 36-mm articulations. Posterior impingement was 65% prosthetic in 32-mm articulations, and 55% prosthetic in 36-mm articulations. Dual mobility cups showed the greatest risk of posterior prosthetic impingement in hyperextension (74%).

CONCLUSION

In standard ROM, both bony and prosthetic impingement occurred in flexion, while prosthetic impingement occurred in extension in models with lipped liners. In hyperextension, prosthetic impingement was more common than bony impingement, and was exclusively the cause of impingement when a lip was used. In flexion, impingement was primarily bony with the use of a 36-mm head. The risk of posterior prosthetic impingement was greatest with dual mobility cups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

背景

撞击是导致翻修全髋关节置换术(THA)不稳定的主要原因。撞击可分为假体、骨或软组织。本研究旨在通过虚拟模拟研究,在位置良好的 THA 中,首先出现的是骨撞击还是假体撞击。

方法

对 23 名需要接受 THA 的患者进行了陶瓷对聚水泥固定假体的规划,使用动态规划软件。当站立时,杯体的倾斜度为 45°,前倾角为 25°。股骨部件和颈长度的定位要重现原生前倾角,并与对侧下肢长度和偏移量匹配。然后,通过在标准和极限活动范围(ROM)内重新创建前向和后向撞击,记录撞击的类型和位置。

结果

在标准 ROM 中,屈曲会产生假体和骨撞击,而在带唇衬的模型中伸展会导致假体撞击。在极限 ROM 中,32mm 关节的前向撞击 78%为骨撞击,36mm 关节的前向撞击 88%为骨撞击。32mm 关节的后向撞击 65%为假体撞击,36mm 关节的后向撞击 55%为假体撞击。双动杯在过伸时后向假体撞击的风险最大(74%)。

结论

在标准 ROM 中,在屈曲时会发生骨撞击和假体撞击,而在带唇衬的模型中伸展时会发生假体撞击。在过伸时,假体撞击比骨撞击更常见,并且当使用唇时,撞击是唯一的原因。在使用 36mm 头时,在屈曲时撞击主要是骨撞击。双动杯的后向假体撞击风险最大。

证据水平

3 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验