• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较MiniMizer Extra可调式胃束带不同固定方法的回顾性队列研究。

A retrospective cohort study comparing different fixation methods for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band.

作者信息

Juodeikis Žygimantas, Brimas Gintautas

机构信息

Clinic of Gastroenterology, Nephro‑Urology and Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2025 Mar 24;20(1):51-54. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2025.17937. eCollection 2025 Apr 9.

DOI:10.20452/wiitm.2025.17937
PMID:40547835
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12177352/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Two decades ago, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding was a leading bariatric sur‑ gery. However, its popularity has declined, with sleeve gastrectomy becoming the predominant choice. The MiniMizer Extra band used in our clinic from 2008 to 2020 was associated with band erosion primarily at its lower edge. In 2014, we started using a modified band fixation technique by placing sutures only on the upper part of the band.

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare 2 different fixation techniques for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band to identify any potential differences in outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we compared 54 patients who underwent adjustable gastric banding with the MiniMizer Extra band between January 1, 2009, and January 31, 2010, with a group of 54 patients who were subjected to the procedure between January 1, 2014, and January 31, 2019, using a different band fixation method.

RESULTS

Weight loss results significantly favored the modified fixation group, with an average total weight loss of 24.2%. The overall complication rate was 12% and was significantly higher in the original fixation group. Complications included 6 cases of band erosion, 4 port‑related issues, 1 case of band slippage, and 2 cases of band intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified fixation group demonstrated improved weight loss results with fewer com‑ plications, suggesting a potential advantage in safety and efficacy of the modified technique.

摘要

引言

二十年前,腹腔镜可调节胃束带术是主要的减肥手术。然而,其受欢迎程度已有所下降,袖状胃切除术成为了主要选择。2008年至2020年期间,我们诊所使用的MiniMizer Extra束带主要在其下缘出现束带侵蚀问题。2014年,我们开始采用一种改良的束带固定技术,仅在束带的上部放置缝线。

目的

本研究的目的是比较MiniMizer Extra可调节胃束带的两种不同固定技术,以确定结果方面的任何潜在差异。

材料与方法

在本研究中,我们将2009年1月1日至2010年1月31日期间接受MiniMizer Extra束带可调节胃束带术的54例患者,与2014年1月1日至2019年1月31日期间采用不同束带固定方法接受该手术的54例患者进行了比较。

结果

体重减轻结果明显有利于改良固定组,平均总体重减轻了24.2%。总体并发症发生率为12%,原始固定组的并发症发生率明显更高。并发症包括6例束带侵蚀、4例与端口相关的问题、1例束带滑脱和2例束带不耐受。

结论

改良固定组显示出更好的体重减轻效果且并发症更少,这表明改良技术在安全性和有效性方面具有潜在优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd9/12177352/c409d6c0cf0e/vomt-20-1-17937-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd9/12177352/c409d6c0cf0e/vomt-20-1-17937-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd9/12177352/c409d6c0cf0e/vomt-20-1-17937-g1.jpg

相似文献

1
A retrospective cohort study comparing different fixation methods for the MiniMizer Extra adjustable gastric band.一项比较MiniMizer Extra可调式胃束带不同固定方法的回顾性队列研究。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2025 Mar 24;20(1):51-54. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2025.17937. eCollection 2025 Apr 9.
2
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.减肥手术治疗肥胖症的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410.
3
Review of meta-analytic comparisons of bariatric surgery with a focus on laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.肥胖症手术的荟萃分析比较综述,重点关注腹腔镜可调节胃束带术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 May-Jun;4(3 Suppl):S47-55. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.04.007.
4
Surgery for the treatment of obesity in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年肥胖症的手术治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 8;9(9):CD011740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011740.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
9
Gastric banding or bypass? A systematic review comparing the two most popular bariatric procedures.胃束带术还是胃旁路术?一项比较两种最流行减肥手术的系统评价。
Am J Med. 2008 Oct;121(10):885-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.05.036.
10
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Long‑term outcomes of adjustable gastric banding: a 15‑year prospective randomized trial comparing 2 band types in 103 patients.可调节胃束带术的长期疗效:一项针对103例患者比较两种束带类型的15年前瞻性随机试验。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024 Dec 11;19(3):421-426. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2024.17918. eCollection 2024 Dec 27.
2
IFSO Worldwide Survey 2020-2021: Current Trends for Bariatric and Metabolic Procedures.2020-2021 年 IFSO 全球调查:减重与代谢手术的当前趋势。
Obes Surg. 2024 Apr;34(4):1075-1085. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07118-3. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
3
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, the past, the present and the future.
腹腔镜可调节胃束带术:过去、现在与未来
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Mar;8(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.17.
4
Long-Term Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Weight Loss at 10 or More Years for All Bariatric Procedures and a Single-Centre Review of 20-Year Outcomes After Adjustable Gastric Banding.减重手术后的长期结果:所有减重手术 10 年以上减重效果的系统评价和荟萃分析,以及可调节胃束带术 20 年结果的单中心回顾。
Obes Surg. 2019 Jan;29(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3525-0.
5
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 5-Year Results of two Different Bands in 103 Patients.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术:一项前瞻性随机临床试验,比较103例患者使用两种不同束带的5年结果。
Obes Surg. 2017 Apr;27(4):1024-1030. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2416-5.
6
Surgery for weight loss in adults.成人减肥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.
7
Systematic review of erosion after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术后侵蚀的系统评价。
Obes Surg. 2011 Aug;21(8):1272-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-011-0430-1.
8
Band slippage and erosion after laparoscopic gastric banding: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜胃束带术后的带片滑脱和侵蚀:一项荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Dec;24(12):2980-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1250-4. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
9
Injection port and connecting tube complications after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术后的注射口和连接管并发症。
Obes Surg. 2010 Apr;20(4):410-4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9561-4. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
10
The "Birmingham stitch"--avoiding slippage in laparoscopic gastric banding.“伯明翰缝合法”——避免腹腔镜胃束带术时出现滑脱
Obes Surg. 2008 Apr;18(4):359-63. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9360-3. Epub 2008 Feb 20.