Stockton Melissa A, Kramer Jack, Chienda Joshua, Morrison Abigail M, Tikhiwa Harriet Akello, Sansbury Griffin, Zumazuma Alex, Mortensen Hillary, Ng'oma Mwawi, Nyirongo Patrick, Mtonga Isaac, Devadas Jackson, Chiliza Bonginkosi, Sefasi Anthony Peter, Mhango Patani, Gaynes Bradley N, Pence Brian W, Kulisewa Kazione
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi.
PLOS Ment Health. 2025;2(5). doi: 10.1371/journal.pmen.0000306. Epub 2025 May 6.
Psychotic disorders are highly stigmatized across the globe, negatively impacting people with psychosis and their families. However, little is known about stigma faced by people with psychosis in sub-Saharan Africa. We developed semi-structured qualitative guides based in a constructivist epistemology and formative research methodologies and conducted 36 in-depth interviews (IDIs) and two focus-group discussions (FGDs) with 12 people with lived experience (PWLE) with psychosis; 12 caregivers of PWLE; six traditional healers; six medical providers; six community leaders (1 FGD); and six religious leaders (1 FGD) in Blantyre, Malawi. We drew from the Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework to delineate the stigmatization process. Participants described key drivers of stigma as lack of awareness, prejudice, stereotypes, and fear. Manifestations included experienced, anticipated, witnessed, perceived, internalized and secondary stigma in the form of insults, gossip, abuse, physical violence, restraints, social exclusion, and employment-based discrimination from family and community. With respect to negative outcomes and health and social impacts, stigma impacted quality of care, resilience, mental health, morbidity, social inclusion and quality of life. In Malawi, stigma is pervasive challenge for PWLE, with severe implication for their health and social wellbeing. In partnership with PWLE, investment into the integration of evidence-based stigma reduction activities into existing psychosis management programs is warranted.
精神病性障碍在全球范围内都受到高度污名化,对精神病患者及其家庭产生负面影响。然而,关于撒哈拉以南非洲地区精神病患者所面临的污名,人们知之甚少。我们基于建构主义认识论和形成性研究方法制定了半结构化定性指南,并在马拉维布兰太尔对12名有精神病生活经历的人、12名精神病患者的照料者、6名传统治疗师、6名医疗服务提供者、6名社区领袖(在一次焦点小组讨论中)以及6名宗教领袖(在一次焦点小组讨论中)进行了36次深入访谈和两次焦点小组讨论。我们借鉴了健康污名与歧视框架来描述污名化过程。参与者将污名的关键驱动因素描述为缺乏认识、偏见、刻板印象和恐惧。其表现形式包括经历的、预期的、目睹的、感知到的、内化的和继发性污名,具体表现为侮辱、流言蜚语、虐待、身体暴力、限制、社会排斥以及来自家庭和社区基于就业的歧视。关于负面后果以及对健康和社会的影响,污名影响了护理质量、恢复力、心理健康、发病率、社会包容和生活质量。在马拉维,污名是有精神病生活经历者普遍面临的挑战,对他们的健康和社会福祉有着严重影响。与有精神病生活经历者合作,有必要投入资源将基于证据的减少污名活动纳入现有的精神病管理项目中。