• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗争时间:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)前死亡风险预测的至关重要性

Fighting time: the critical importance of pre-TAVR mortality risk prediction.

作者信息

Shamekhi Jasmin, Ebert Marius, Lorek Angelina, Eckardt Irina, Al-Kassou Baravan, Basha Mustafa Mousa, Weber Marcel, Silaschi Miriam, Bakhtiary Farhad, Nickenig Georg, Zimmer Sebastian

机构信息

Heart Center Bonn, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Germany.

Heart Center Bonn, Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02698-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00392-025-02698-1
PMID:40549031
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a life-threatening condition requiring prompt medical attention. While transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective treatment, current scheduling practices often do not account for individual patient risk profiles due to limited data on mortality rates during the waiting period and a lack of viable risk assessment. Consequently, non-prioritized wait times may be unacceptably long for high-risk patient populations.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the mortality rate of patients with symptomatic severe AS awaiting TAVR and identify pragmatic clinical risk predictors during this period.

METHODS

Between January 2019 and December 2023, 2,454 patients with symptomatic severe AS, were scheduled for TAVR after an interdisciplinary Heart Team discussion at the Heart Center Bonn. Mortality during the waiting period was assessed, and the characteristics of survivors (patients who underwent TAVR) were compared to non-survivors (patients who died before the procedure).

RESULTS

The median waiting time for TAVR was 41 days. A total of 105 (4.3%) patients died during the waiting period, with a median time to death of 29 days. By comparison, 30 day post-TAVR mortality, including the intervention, was 1.7%. Multivariate regression analysis identified independent predictors of pre-TAVR mortality including reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, and advanced heart failure symptoms. An IMPACT score, incorporating these parameters, strongly predicted outcome with a hazard ratio for mortality of 2.1 greatly outperforming both EuroSCORE II and STS-PROM. The IMPACT score of ≥ 5 identified high-risk patients with a pre-TAVR mortality rate of 12.6%.

CONCLUSION

The mortality rate for patients with symptomatic severe AS awaiting TAVR is unacceptably high. Utilizing the IMPACT score could enable precise risk stratification, identifying patients who require urgent or prioritized intervention to improve outcomes.

摘要

背景

有症状的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)是一种危及生命的疾病,需要及时就医。虽然经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)是一种有效的治疗方法,但由于等待期死亡率数据有限且缺乏可行的风险评估,目前的手术安排做法往往没有考虑到个体患者的风险状况。因此,对于高危患者群体来说,未被优先安排的等待时间可能长得令人无法接受。

目的

本研究旨在评估等待TAVR的有症状严重AS患者的死亡率,并确定在此期间实用的临床风险预测因素。

方法

在2019年1月至2023年12月期间,2454例有症状严重AS患者在波恩心脏中心经过跨学科心脏团队讨论后被安排接受TAVR。评估等待期的死亡率,并将存活者(接受TAVR的患者)的特征与非存活者(手术前死亡的患者)进行比较。

结果

TAVR的中位等待时间为41天。共有105例(4.3%)患者在等待期死亡,中位死亡时间为29天。相比之下,包括干预在内的TAVR术后30天死亡率为1.7%。多变量回归分析确定了TAVR术前死亡率的独立预测因素,包括左心室射血分数降低、估计肾小球滤过率下降、二尖瓣反流、三尖瓣反流和晚期心力衰竭症状。纳入这些参数的IMPACT评分强烈预测了结果,死亡率的风险比为2.1,大大优于欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCORE II)和胸外科医师协会预测模型(STS-PROM)。IMPACT评分≥5可识别出TAVR术前死亡率为12.6%的高危患者。

结论

等待TAVR的有症状严重AS患者的死亡率高得令人无法接受。使用IMPACT评分可以实现精确的风险分层,识别出需要紧急或优先干预以改善预后的患者。

相似文献

1
Fighting time: the critical importance of pre-TAVR mortality risk prediction.抗争时间:经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)前死亡风险预测的至关重要性
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02698-1.
2
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.
3
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing 3 Aortic Valve Interventions: The THIRD Multicenter Registry.接受3种主动脉瓣干预治疗患者的临床特征与结局:THIRD多中心注册研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 13;18(1):103-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.037.
4
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Epidural therapy for the treatment of severe pre-eclampsia in non labouring women.硬膜外治疗非分娩期妇女的重度子痫前期。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 28;11(11):CD009540. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009540.pub2.
8
Heliox for croup in children.氦氧混合气治疗儿童喉炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 16;8(8):CD006822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006822.pub6.
9
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
10
5-Year Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients.低风险患者经导管与外科主动脉瓣置换术的5年超声心动图结果
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Jun;18(6):625-640. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Wait-times benchmarks for risk-based prioritization in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a simulation study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中基于风险的优先排序的等待时间基准:一项模拟研究。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025 Jan 16;11(1):10-18. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae059.
2
Regional assessment of availability for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Sweden: a long-term observational study.瑞典经导管主动脉瓣植入术可及性的区域评估:一项长期观察性研究。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2024 Nov 5;10(7):641-649. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad076.
3
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术在五年内的低危患者中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 23;389(21):1949-1960. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307447. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
4
Time to TAVI: streamlining the pathway to treatment.TAVI 时间:治疗途径的优化。
Open Heart. 2023 Sep;10(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002170.
5
Calcific aortic valve disease: mechanisms, prevention and treatment.钙化性主动脉瓣疾病:机制、预防和治疗。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Aug;20(8):546-559. doi: 10.1038/s41569-023-00845-7. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
6
Waiting times of women vs. men undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.女性与男性行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的等待时间比较。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2023 Nov 2;9(7):691-698. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac081.
7
Impact of wait times on late postprocedural mortality after successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后成功后等待时间对晚期术后死亡率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 8;12(1):5967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09995-z.
8
Association of Mortality With Aortic Stenosis Severity in Outpatients: Results From the VALVENOR Study.门诊主动脉瓣狭窄严重程度与死亡率的相关性:VALVENOR 研究结果。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Dec 1;6(12):1424-1431. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.3718.
9
Increasing Wait-Time Mortality for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Population-Level Study of the Transition in Practice From Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者等待时间导致的死亡率增加:一项关于从外科主动脉瓣置换术到经导管主动脉瓣置换术实践转变的人群水平研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;13(11):e009297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009297. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Aortic Stenosis: Guidelines and Evidence Gaps.主动脉瓣狭窄:指南与证据缺口。
Cardiol Clin. 2020 Feb;38(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Nov 1.