• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CBC马西斯和CLS斯波托诺柄:设计相似,结果不同。临床和放射学差异的比较研究。

CBC Mathys and CLS Spotorno stems: similar in design, different in outcomes. A comparative study of clinical and radiological differences.

作者信息

Bazán Paula, Torres Adrián, Gómez-Álvarez Jorge, Villarreal Gregorio, San-Julián Mikel, Lamo-Espinosa José María

机构信息

University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Hospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio Gonzalez, Monterrey, Mexico.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jun 23;145(1):353. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05966-x.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-025-05966-x
PMID:40549201
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly successful orthopedic intervention, with non-cemented stems like the CLS Spotorno and CBC Mathys being widely used. While these stems share a similar tapered design, they may produce different clinical and radiological outcomes. This study aims to compare clinical outcomes (Merlé-D'Aubigné scale) and radiological results between the CBC (Mathys) stem and the CLS Spotorno stem, specifically evaluating cortical hypertrophy, radiolucency, stem subsidence, and implant survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective 1:1 matched cohort study was conducted, including 344 THA patients (172 with CBC Mathys, 172 with CLS Spotorno) treated between 2010 and 2019. Radiological assessment included cortical hypertrophy, radiolucency, and stem subsidence using MEDICAD software. Clinical outcomes were evaluated via the Merlé-D'Aubigné scale. Stem survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics were similar in both groups. Cortical hypertrophy occurred in 42.4% of the CBC Mathys group, significantly higher than the 4.6% in the CLS Spotorno group (p = 0.03). Radiolucencies were more frequent in the CBC Mathys group (55.2%) compared to CLS Spotorno (18.6%) (p = 0.03). No significant differences in stem subsidence were observed (p = 0.68). The average time of cortical hypertrophy appearance and radiolucency was 12.97 (SD: 15.51) and 13.48 (SD: 15.57) months, respectively. At final follow-up, four CBC Mathys stems were revised due to aseptic mobilization, resulting in a 97.6% survival rate, compared to 100% in the CLS Spotorno group (p = 0.182).

CONCLUSION

The CBC Mathys stem exhibited higher incidences of cortical hypertrophy and progressive radiolucency, suggesting biomechanical and tissue response differences compared to the CLS Spotorno stem. These radiological findings correlated with a slightly reduced survival rate for the CBC Mathys stem over six years, are already observable in many cases by the end of the first year, warranting further investigation into long-term clinical outcomes.

摘要

引言

全髋关节置换术(THA)是一种非常成功的骨科手术,CLS Spotorno和CBC Mathys等非骨水泥型股骨柄被广泛应用。虽然这些股骨柄具有相似的锥形设计,但它们可能产生不同的临床和影像学结果。本研究旨在比较CBC(Mathys)股骨柄和CLS Spotorno股骨柄的临床结果(Merlé-D'Aubigné评分)和影像学结果,特别评估皮质肥大、透亮线、股骨柄下沉和植入物生存率。

材料与方法

进行了一项回顾性1:1匹配队列研究,纳入2010年至2019年期间接受治疗的344例THA患者(172例使用CBC Mathys股骨柄,172例使用CLS Spotorno股骨柄)。影像学评估包括使用MEDICAD软件评估皮质肥大、透亮线和股骨柄下沉。通过Merlé-D'Aubigné评分评估临床结果。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线分析股骨柄生存率。

结果

两组的基线人口统计学特征相似。CBC Mathys组中42.4%出现皮质肥大,显著高于CLS Spotorno组的4.6%(p = 0.03)。CBC Mathys组的透亮线发生率(55.2%)高于CLS Spotorno组(18.6%)(p = 0.03)。股骨柄下沉未观察到显著差异(p = 0.68)。皮质肥大出现和透亮线出现的平均时间分别为12.97(标准差:15.51)个月和13.48(标准差:15.57)个月。在最终随访时,4例CBC Mathys股骨柄因无菌性松动而翻修,生存率为97.6%,而CLS Spotorno组为100%(p = 0.182)。

结论

CBC Mathys股骨柄的皮质肥大和进行性透亮线发生率较高,表明与CLS Spotorno股骨柄相比存在生物力学和组织反应差异。这些影像学结果与CBC Mathys股骨柄在六年内生存率略有降低相关,在许多情况下在第一年末就已可观察到,需要对长期临床结果进行进一步研究。

相似文献

1
CBC Mathys and CLS Spotorno stems: similar in design, different in outcomes. A comparative study of clinical and radiological differences.CBC马西斯和CLS斯波托诺柄:设计相似,结果不同。临床和放射学差异的比较研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Jun 23;145(1):353. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05966-x.
2
Long-term survival of CLS Spotorno femoral stem: a systematic review of literature.CLS Spotorno 股骨柄的长期生存率:文献系统回顾。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun;142(6):1239-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03975-0. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
3
Long-term implant survival, functional, and radiological assessment of cemented stem in revision hip arthroplasty.翻修髋关节置换术中骨水泥型股骨柄的长期植入物存活、功能及影像学评估。
Int Orthop. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06526-z.
4
Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人囊内型髋部骨折的手术治疗:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 14;2(2):CD013404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013404.pub2.
5
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
6
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Threaded cup in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of long-term survivorship.全髋关节置换术中的螺纹髋臼杯:长期生存率的系统评价
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 5;35(1):236. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04364-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term survival of CLS Spotorno femoral stem: a systematic review of literature.CLS Spotorno 股骨柄的长期生存率:文献系统回顾。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun;142(6):1239-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03975-0. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
2
Long-term bone remodelling around 'legendary' cementless femoral stems.“传奇”非骨水泥型股骨柄周围的长期骨重塑
EFORT Open Rev. 2018 Feb 26;3(2):45-57. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170024. eCollection 2018 Feb.
3
Distal femoral cortical hypertrophy after hip arthroplasty using a cementless doubletapered femoral stem.
使用非骨水泥双锥形股骨干进行髋关节置换术后的股骨远端皮质肥厚。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2016 Dec;24(3):317-322. doi: 10.1177/1602400309.
4
Clinical outcome of design modifications to the CLS Spotorno Stem in total hip replacement.全髋关节置换中CLS Spotorno柄设计改良的临床结果
Joints. 2016 Sep 21;4(3):134-141. doi: 10.11138/jts/2016.4.3.134. eCollection 2016 Jul-Sep.
5
Performance of the CLS Spotorno uncemented stem in the third decade after implantation.植入后第 3 个 10 年中 CLS Spotorno 非骨水泥型柄的表现。
Bone Joint J. 2014 Apr;96-B(4):455-61. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.32607.
6
Biomechanics of a short stem: In vitro primary stability and stress shielding of a conservative cementless hip stem.短柄的生物力学:一种保守型非骨水泥髋关节柄的体外初始稳定性和应力遮挡。
J Orthop Res. 2013 Aug;31(8):1180-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.22349. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
7
High survival in young patients using a second generation uncemented total hip replacement.年轻患者使用第二代非骨水泥全髋关节置换的高存活率。
Int Orthop. 2012 Jun;36(6):1129-36. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1399-z. Epub 2011 Nov 24.
8
Seventeen-year survival of the cementless CLS Spotorno stem.无水泥 CLS Spotorno 柄十七年的存活率。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010 Feb;130(2):269-75. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-0969-7.
9
Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation.髋关节置换术。一种新手术。
Lancet. 1961 May 27;1(7187):1129-32. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(61)92063-3.
10
Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis.丙烯酸假体髋关节置换术的功能结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954 Jun;36-A(3):451-75.