• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期乳腺癌墨西哥女性患者对医疗保健无效性的看法:患者视角

Futility in healthcare among Mexican female patients with breast cancer in advanced stage: The patient perspective.

作者信息

Namba-Bando María Del Mar Yukie, Contreras-Yáñez Irazú, Tenorio-Torres Juan Alberto, Pascual-Ramos Virginia

机构信息

Fundación de Cáncer de Mama (Breast Cancer Foundation) FUCAM A.C., Mexico City, Mexico.

Immunology and Rheumatology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326332. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0326332
PMID:40549776
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12185015/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women in Mexico, and the outcomes for patients are often poor. Futility in healthcare (FHC) occurs when treatment fails to achieve its intended goals, resulting in negative consequences. This study aimed to estimate the proportion of female patients in Mexico with advanced-stage breast cancer (ABC) who perceive FHC. Additionally, we inform the development and validation of a questionnaire (FHC-Q) to assess this phenomenon.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted from May 17, 2024, to December 30, 2024, in three phases. It involved three convenience samples (S) of adult women with ABC: S-1 (n = 30), S-2 (n = 201), and S-3 (n = 257). Phase 1 focused on constructing the FHC-Q, evaluating its content validity (expert agreement), and conducting a pilot test to assess its feasibility, all within S-1. Phase 2 involved assessing the questionnaire's reliability (internal consistency and temporal stability), construct validity (correlations between FHC-Q and DASS21 scores, along with exploratory factor analysis), and criterion validity (correlations between FHC-Q and SF-36 scores), all in S-2. Phase 3 estimated the FHC phenomenon in S-3. The definition of FHC was established using the Delphi method.

RESULTS

Participants represented typical female Mexican patients with ABC. The FHC-Q comprised 16 items distributed into five dimensions. The FHC-Q demonstrated feasibility and validity, with expert agreement of ≥80% and a five-factor structure explaining 57.8% of the variance. Correlations between the FHC-Q, DASS21 and SF-36 scores were significant and low to moderate. The FHC-Q reliability was confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.766 and an ICC of 0.845 (95% CI: 0.735-0.909). FHC was perceived by 3.9% of the participants.

CONCLUSIONS

FHC was perceived by a minority of Mexican women with ABC stages. The FHC-Q was valid, reliable and feasible to assess the phenomenon in the target population.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌是墨西哥女性癌症相关死亡的主要原因,患者的治疗结果往往不佳。当治疗未能实现其预期目标并产生负面后果时,就会出现医疗保健中的无效性(FHC)。本研究旨在估计墨西哥晚期乳腺癌(ABC)女性患者中感知到FHC的比例。此外,我们为评估这一现象的问卷(FHC-Q)的开发和验证提供信息。

患者与方法

这项横断面研究于2024年5月17日至2024年12月30日分三个阶段进行。它涉及成年ABC女性的三个便利样本(S):S-1(n = 30)、S-2(n = 201)和S-3(n = 257)。第一阶段专注于构建FHC-Q,评估其内容效度(专家共识),并在S-1内进行预测试以评估其可行性。第二阶段涉及评估问卷的信度(内部一致性和时间稳定性)、结构效度(FHC-Q与DASS21分数之间的相关性以及探索性因素分析)和效标效度(FHC-Q与SF-36分数之间的相关性),均在S-2中进行。第三阶段估计S-3中的FHC现象。使用德尔菲法确定FHC的定义。

结果

参与者代表典型的墨西哥ABC女性患者。FHC-Q由16个项目组成,分为五个维度。FHC-Q展示了可行性和有效性,专家共识≥80%,五因素结构解释了57.8%的方差。FHC-Q、DASS21和SF-36分数之间的相关性显著且为低到中度。FHC-Q的信度通过Cronbach's α为0.766和ICC为0.845(95%CI:0.735 - 0.909)得到确认。3.9%的参与者感知到FHC。

结论

少数处于ABC期的墨西哥女性感知到了FHC。FHC-Q对于评估目标人群中的这一现象是有效、可靠且可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd19/12185015/72f3b5bb1c70/pone.0326332.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd19/12185015/cb535bfdf958/pone.0326332.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd19/12185015/72f3b5bb1c70/pone.0326332.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd19/12185015/cb535bfdf958/pone.0326332.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd19/12185015/72f3b5bb1c70/pone.0326332.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Futility in healthcare among Mexican female patients with breast cancer in advanced stage: The patient perspective.晚期乳腺癌墨西哥女性患者对医疗保健无效性的看法:患者视角
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326332. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric validation and interpretation thresholds of the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life (HiSQOL©) questionnaire using pooled data from the phase III BE HEARD I & II trials of bimekizumab in hidradenitis suppurativa.使用比美吉珠单抗治疗化脓性汗腺炎的III期BE HEARD I和II试验的汇总数据,对化脓性汗腺炎生活质量(HiSQOL©)问卷进行心理测量学验证和解释阈值分析。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):93-104. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf067.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
5
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Development and Validation of a Chinese Version of an Information Needs Questionnaire for Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy.中文版乳腺癌放疗患者信息需求问卷的编制与验证
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jul;34(7):2690-2701. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17682. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
8
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Therapeutic Obstinacy in End-of-Life Care-A Perspective of Healthcare Professionals from Romania.临终关怀中的治疗顽固性——罗马尼亚医疗保健专业人员的视角
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 10;12(16):1593. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161593.
2
Social Genomic Determinants of Health: Understanding the Molecular Pathways by Which Neighborhood Disadvantage Affects Cancer Outcomes.社会基因组学与健康:了解邻里劣势影响癌症结局的分子途径。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 20;42(30):3618-3627. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02780. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Guidelines for the development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review.
患者报告结局测量的开发和验证指南:范围综述。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Nov 22;29(6):363-373. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112681.
4
Conceptualization of patient-centered care in Latin America: A scoping review.拉丁美洲患者为中心的护理理念:范围综述。
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1820-1831. doi: 10.1111/hex.13797. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
5
Use of Delphi in health sciences research: A narrative review.德尔菲法在健康科学研究中的应用:叙述性综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 17;102(7):e32829. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032829.
6
How survey scoring decisions can influence your study's results: A trip through the IRT looking glass.调查评分决策如何影响研究结果:IRT 视角下的探索。
Psychol Methods. 2024 Oct;29(5):1003-1024. doi: 10.1037/met0000506. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
7
Socioeconomic, Clinical, and Molecular Features of Breast Cancer Influence Overall Survival of Latin American Women.乳腺癌的社会经济、临床和分子特征影响拉丁美洲女性的总生存期。
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 8;12:845527. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.845527. eCollection 2022.
8
Has Latin America achieved universal health coverage yet? Lessons from four countries.拉丁美洲实现全民健康覆盖了吗?来自四个国家的经验教训。
Arch Public Health. 2022 Jan 21;80(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00793-7.
9
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
Histological type and typing of breast carcinomas and the WHO classification changes over time.乳腺癌的组织学类型及分型以及世界卫生组织的分类随时间而变化。
Pathologica. 2020 Mar;112(1):25-41. doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-1-20.