Suppr超能文献

[食物频率问卷与24小时膳食回顾法或称重法在评估孕妇膳食营养素摄入量方面的比较]

[Comparison between food frequency questionnaire and 24-hour dietary recall or weighing methods in evaluating dietary nutrient intakes of pregnant women].

作者信息

Zhang Jing, Yu Jiangfan, Duan Yifan, Yang Zhenyu, Bi Ye, Zhang Yuwen, Liu Changqing, Zhao Yongli, Gu Xuyang, Gao Jianghua, Duan Jingtao, Lai Jianqiang, Guo Haoyan

机构信息

National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Key Laboratory of Breast Milk Science Research, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, NHC Key Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, Beijing 100050, China.

Chaoyang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100021, China.

出版信息

Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2025 May;54(3):455-464. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.03.016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the similarities and differences among Food Frequency Questionnaire(FFQ), 24-hour dietary recall method, and weighing method in assessing the intakes of foods, energy, and nutrients in pregnant women, and to evaluate the validity of the FFQ.

METHODS

From June to September in 2017, a total of 82 pregnant women were recruited across the entire Wuqiang County in Hebei Province. The subjects were surveyed using the FFQ for the most recent week, 24-hour dietary recall for 3 consecutive days, and in-home weighing for 3 consecutive days. The differences in the average daily intakes of food, energy, and nutrients obtained by the FFQ and the other two method were calculated and compared. The correlation and consistency between the FFQ and the other two method were evaluated through the Spearman correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot, respectively.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and 24-hour dietary recall method in assessing the average daily intakes of soybeans and their products, fruits, dairy products and nuts. The intakes of fruits and dairy products evaluated by the two method were all positively correlated(r=0.34-0.56, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and the weighing method in assessing the average daily intakes of cereals, soybeans and their products, vegetables, fruits, aquatic products, eggs, dairy products and nuts. Among them, the intakes obtained by the two method for cereals, vegetables and nuts were all positively correlated(r=0.53-0.58, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the FFQ and 24-hour dietary recall method in evaluating average daily intakes of energy, protein, carbohydrates, the ratio of carbohydrates to energy supply, dietary fiber, total vitamin A, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin C, calcium, phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, iron and zinc. Among them, intakes of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates were all positively correlated(r=0.41-0.58, P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between FFQ and weighing method in evaluating the average daily intakes of energy, fat, the ratio of fat to energy supply, carbohydrates, the ratio of carbohydrates to energy supply, total vitamin A, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin C, calcium, potassium, sodium and magnesium. Among them, the intakes of energy, protein and carbohydrates obtained by the two method were all positively correlated(r=0.49-0.52, P<0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed that for most subjects, the intakes of energy, protein, fat and carbohydrates were within the 95% consistency limits between FFQ and 24-hour recall method(91.1%-94.9%)or weighing method(92.9%-100%).

CONCLUSION

FFQ can relatively accurately evaluate the intakes of food and nutrients among pregnant women.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较食物频率问卷(FFQ)、24小时膳食回顾法和称重法在评估孕妇食物、能量和营养素摄入量方面的异同,并评估FFQ的有效性。

方法

2017年6月至9月,在河北省武强县全县范围内共招募了82名孕妇。采用FFQ对受试者进行最近一周的调查,连续3天进行24小时膳食回顾,并连续3天进行家庭称重。计算并比较FFQ与其他两种方法获得的食物、能量和营养素平均每日摄入量的差异。分别通过Spearman相关系数和Bland-Altman图评估FFQ与其他两种方法之间的相关性和一致性。

结果

FFQ与24小时膳食回顾法在评估大豆及其制品、水果、乳制品和坚果的平均每日摄入量方面无统计学显著差异。两种方法评估的水果和乳制品摄入量均呈正相关(r=0.34-0.56,P<0.05)。FFQ与称重法在评估谷类、大豆及其制品、蔬菜、水果、水产品、蛋类、乳制品和坚果的平均每日摄入量方面无统计学显著差异。其中,两种方法获得的谷类、蔬菜和坚果摄入量均呈正相关(r=0.53-0.58,P<0.05)。FFQ与24小时膳食回顾法在评估能量、蛋白质、碳水化合物、碳水化合物与能量供应比、膳食纤维、总维生素A、硫胺素、核黄素、维生素C、钙、磷、钾镁、铁和锌的平均每日摄入量方面无统计学显著差异。其中,能量、蛋白质、脂肪和碳水化合物的摄入量均呈正相关(r=0.41-0.58,P<0.05)。FFQ与称重法在评估能量、脂肪、脂肪与能量供应比、碳水化合物、碳水化合物与能量供应比、总维生素A、硫胺素、核黄素、维生素C、钙、钾、钠和镁的平均每日摄入量方面无统计学显著差异。其中,两种方法获得的能量、蛋白质和碳水化合物摄入量均呈正相关(r=0.49-0.52,P<0.05)。Bland-Altman分析表明,对于大多数受试者,能量、蛋白质、脂肪和碳水化合物的摄入量在FFQ与24小时回顾法(91.1%-94.9%)或称重法(92.9%-100%)的95%一致性界限内。

结论

FFQ能够相对准确地评估孕妇的食物及营养素摄入量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验