Int-Veen Isabell, De Smet Stefanie, Pulopulos Matias M, Vanhollebeke Gert, Barth Beatrix, Pasche Sarah, Albasini Francesco, Baeken Chris, Nuerk Hans-Christoph, Plewnia Christian, Nieratschker Vanessa, Fallgatter Andreas Jochen, Ehlis Ann-Christine, Rosenbaum David, Vanderhasselt Marie-Anne
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of Head and Skin, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01314-z.
The DLPFC plays a central role in cognitive appraisal and stress regulation, as this process-particularly secondary appraisal, where individuals assess their ability to cope with a situation-significantly influences stress responses on both psychological and physiological levels. We conducted a study where we applied different types of Theta Burst Stimulation (intermittent (i)TBS vs. continuous (c)TBS vs. sham (s)TBS) to the left DLPFC to increase or decrease the cortical excitability of the prefrontal neural network. We then examined how participants responded psychologically and physiologically to a potent psychosocial stressor, the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST), and aimed to investigate the influence of secondary cognitive appraisal on the effects of TBS on the stress response. Depending on the stimulation, we discovered that the cognitive appraisal significantly influenced rumination, positive and negative affect specifically in stress recovery. More precisely, as expected, individuals who perceived greater control experienced a faster recovery of stress-reactive ruminative thinking following sTBS and lower rumination following the stressor. We found lower increases and faster recovery of negative affect in all stimulation conditions and faster decreases in positive affect after the TSST following cTBS and iTBS, suggesting beneficial effects of both stimulation conditions. Concerning the assessed physiological variables, namely heart rate, heart rate variability, and salivary cortisol, we did not observe any impact of appraisal. These findings suggest that the effect of secondary appraisal on psychological variables depends on the type of stimulation, and while it may be linked to increased DLPFC activity, further research is needed to clarify the neurostimulation mechanisms involved.
背外侧前额叶皮层在认知评估和压力调节中起着核心作用,因为这一过程——尤其是二次评估,即个体评估自身应对某种情况的能力——会在心理和生理层面显著影响压力反应。我们进行了一项研究,对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层施加不同类型的theta爆发刺激(间歇性(i)TBS与连续性(c)TBS与假刺激(s)TBS),以增加或降低前额叶神经网络的皮层兴奋性。然后,我们研究了参与者在面对一种强烈的心理社会压力源——特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)时的心理和生理反应,旨在探究二次认知评估对TBS对压力反应影响的作用。根据刺激类型,我们发现认知评估在压力恢复过程中对沉思、积极和消极情绪有显著影响。更确切地说,正如预期的那样,感觉控制能力更强的个体在接受假刺激后,压力反应性沉思思维恢复得更快,而在压力源出现后沉思较少。我们发现在所有刺激条件下,消极情绪的增加幅度较小且恢复较快,而在接受连续性TBS和间歇性TBS后,特里尔社会压力测试后积极情绪下降得更快,这表明两种刺激条件都有有益效果。关于所评估的生理变量,即心率、心率变异性和唾液皮质醇,我们未观察到评估有任何影响。这些发现表明,二次评估对心理变量的影响取决于刺激类型,虽然可能与背外侧前额叶皮层活动增加有关,但仍需要进一步研究来阐明其中涉及的神经刺激机制。