Buchan John A, Burkhart Andrew, Ross Phillip R, Stern Peter J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, OH, 45267, Cincinnati, USA.
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 23;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00905-4.
Upper extremity soft tissue infections are commonly encountered in emergency department settings and often require timely interventions. Acute phase reactants, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cell count (WBC), are commonly used in diagnostic workups. However, the utility of these biomarkers in the management of upper extremity infections remains uncertain. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of these acute phase reactants in a broad cohort of patients requiring intervention for upper extremity infections.
A retrospective review over five years identified 103 patients with upper extremity infections who required incision and drainage. The study found variable sensitivity and reliability of acute phase reactants, particularly for infections distal to the wrist. The average ESR was 42 mm/hr, CRP 64.1 mg/L, and WBC 10.5 × 10³/uL. Of patients with normal acute phase reactants, all had infections located at or distal to the wrist. Notably, patients with culture-negative infections did not exhibit significant differences in laboratory values compared to those with positive cultures.
Our study highlights the limitations of acute phase reactants as diagnostic tools for upper extremity infections, particularly in cases involving infections distal to the wrist. Despite the frequent elevation of these markers in infections requiring surgical intervention, they should not be relied upon as sole determinants of management. A thorough clinical examination and history remain critical in guiding treatment decisions. This study underscores the need for caution when using these biomarkers to rule in or rule out infection in the emergency department.
上肢软组织感染在急诊科较为常见,通常需要及时干预。急性期反应物,如C反应蛋白(CRP)、红细胞沉降率(ESR)和白细胞计数(WBC),常用于诊断检查。然而,这些生物标志物在上肢感染管理中的效用仍不确定。本研究评估了这些急性期反应物在一大群需要干预上肢感染的患者中的诊断价值。
一项为期五年的回顾性研究确定了103例需要切开引流的上肢感染患者。该研究发现急性期反应物的敏感性和可靠性各不相同,尤其是对于腕部远端的感染。平均ESR为42毫米/小时,CRP为64.1毫克/升,WBC为10.5×10³/微升。急性期反应物正常的患者,所有感染均位于腕部或腕部远端。值得注意的是,培养阴性感染患者与培养阳性患者的实验室值无显著差异。
我们的研究强调了急性期反应物作为上肢感染诊断工具的局限性,特别是在涉及腕部远端感染的病例中。尽管这些标志物在需要手术干预的感染中经常升高,但不应将它们作为管理的唯一决定因素。全面的临床检查和病史对于指导治疗决策仍然至关重要。本研究强调了在急诊科使用这些生物标志物来确定或排除感染时需要谨慎。