Quinney Blake, Wenzel Michael, Thai Michael, Okimoto Tyler, Woodyatt Lydia
The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2025 Jul;64(3):e70001. doi: 10.1111/bjso.70001.
Victims have the prerogative to withhold forgiveness. However, offenders who apologize may believe that they have acted correctly and can feel wronged by victims who refuse to forgive in return. Indeed, apologetic offenders can perceive victims' non-forgiveness as violating an apology-forgiveness reciprocity norm and as a threat to their own sense of status/power, which makes offenders perceive themselves as victims, and less willing to engage in further reconciliatory behaviour. The present research investigates whether offenders' trait empathy can qualify these destructive responses to non-forgiveness. We originally theorized that a greater capacity to empathize with victims may help offenders better understand victims' non-forgiveness and react less negatively to it. Across three studies (combined N = 1000), we find evidence of the contrary-offenders who have high trait empathy tend to react more negatively to non-forgiving victims. Our findings suggest this is because empathic offenders believe that victims should reciprocate their reparatory action with an empathic response. This presents a conundrum for repair processes that promote empathy.
受害者有权拒绝原谅。然而,道歉的冒犯者可能认为自己的行为是正确的,而拒绝给予回报性原谅的受害者可能会让他们感到委屈。事实上,心怀歉意的冒犯者可能会将受害者的不原谅视为违反了道歉 - 原谅的互惠规范,并视为对自身地位/权力感的威胁,这会让冒犯者将自己视为受害者,从而不太愿意采取进一步的和解行为。本研究调查了冒犯者的特质同理心是否会影响他们对不原谅的这些破坏性反应。我们最初的理论是,更强的同理心能力可能有助于冒犯者更好地理解受害者的不原谅,并对此做出不那么消极的反应。在三项研究(样本总量N = 1000)中,我们发现了相反的证据——特质同理心高的冒犯者往往对不原谅他们的受害者反应更消极。我们的研究结果表明,这是因为有同理心的冒犯者认为受害者应该以同理心回应来回报他们的补偿行为。这给促进同理心的修复过程带来了一个难题。