Suppr超能文献

不同(基于周边离焦)眼镜设计预防近视进展的比较评估:一项双盲随机临床试验。

Comparative evaluation of different (peripheral defocus based) spectacle designs in preventing myopia progression: A double-blinded randomised clinical trial.

作者信息

Gupta Vinay, Saxena Rohit, Dhiman Rebika, Phuljhele Swati, Sharma Namrata

机构信息

Dr. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1111/opo.13548.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different peripheral defocus-based spectacle designs [Defocus Induced Multiple Segment (DIMS), Highly Aspherical Lenslets (HALT) and Cylindrical Annular Refractive Elements (CARE)] in controlling myopia progression.

METHODS

This was a prospective, interventional, double-blinded, randomised clinical trial. Children aged 5 to 15 years, with myopia ranging from -1 D to -8 D and documented myopia progression of ≥0.5 D/year, were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to wear either DIMS, HALT or CARE spectacles full-time. Cycloplegic refraction and axial length measurements were taken at baseline and after 1 year. The primary outcome was the change in the rate of myopia progression. All analyses were performed based on the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

A total of 120 participants (40 in each group: DIMS, HALT and CARE) with a mean age of 10.1 ± 3.3 years (57% male) were enrolled. At the 1-year follow-up, the rate of myopia progression reduced by 0.38 ± 0.13 D/year (56.7%), 0.36 ± 0.12 D/year (58.1%) and 0.31 ± 0.15 D/year (47%) for the DIMS, HALT and CARE groups, respectively. The respective change in axial length was 0.2 ± 0.11 mm, 0.19 ± 0.12 mm and 0.23 ± 0.14 mm. Inter-group comparisons showed a significant difference in spherical equivalent refractive error changes between HALT and CARE (p = 0.04) and in the rate of myopia progression between DIMS and CARE (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between HALT and DIMS for any parameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Spectacle lenses incorporating peripheral defocus (DIMS, HALT and CARE) were all effective in reducing the rate of myopia progression significantly, with no adverse effects being observed. Among the three designs, DIMS and HALT exhibited comparable and significantly better efficacy than CARE spectacles at 1 year follow-up. However, further long-term studies are required to validate these findings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估和比较不同基于周边离焦的眼镜设计[离焦诱导多焦点(DIMS)、高非球面微透镜(HALT)和柱面环形折射元件(CARE)]在控制近视进展方面的疗效。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、干预性、双盲、随机临床试验。年龄在5至15岁、近视度数在-1 D至-8 D之间且记录显示近视进展≥0.5 D/年的儿童被随机分配(1:1:1),分别全天佩戴DIMS、HALT或CARE眼镜。在基线和1年后进行睫状肌麻痹验光和眼轴长度测量。主要结局是近视进展速率的变化。所有分析均基于意向性分析原则进行。

结果

共纳入120名参与者(每组40名:DIMS组、HALT组和CARE组),平均年龄为10.1±3.3岁(男性占57%)。在1年随访时,DIMS组、HALT组和CARE组的近视进展速率分别降低了0.38±0.13 D/年(56.7%)、0.36±0.12 D/年(58.1%)和0.31±0.15 D/年(47%)。眼轴长度的相应变化分别为0.2±0.11 mm、0.19±0.12 mm和0.23±0.14 mm。组间比较显示,HALT组和CARE组在等效球镜屈光不正变化方面存在显著差异(p = 0.04),DIMS组和CARE组在近视进展速率方面存在显著差异(p = 0.04)。在任何参数上,HALT组和DIMS组之间均未发现显著差异。

结论

采用周边离焦的眼镜镜片(DIMS、HALT和CARE)在显著降低近视进展速率方面均有效,且未观察到不良反应。在这三种设计中,在1年随访时,DIMS和HALT的疗效相当,且显著优于CARE眼镜。然而,需要进一步的长期研究来验证这些发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验