Navalakhe Milind, Sharma Monankita, Sahai Anoushka, Jadhav Mruganayani, Shriwastav Pooja, Janerao Ashwini
King Edward Memorial Hospital Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College, Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Maharashtra, India.
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jun 27;63(2):69-74. doi: 10.4274/tao.2025.2024-8-13. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
Obstructive salivary gland diseases were traditionally managed conservatively, with surgical treatment reserved for refractory cases only. These surgeries, ranging from papillotomy to sialadenectomy, often involved numerous complications. In the past two decades, sialendoscopy, a minimally invasive technique, has made tremendous progress due to its advantages. This study aims to describe the efficacy of combined approach sialendoscopy as a minimally invasive option for large-sized sialolithiasis that is not amenable to sialendoscopy alone.
It is an ambispective study of 12 patients over a span of 3.5 years at a tertiary care center conducted with all consenting patients who were treated with combined approach sialendoscopy. Ultrasonography and computed tomography of the patients was done. Therapeutic intervention in the form of combined approach sialendoscopy was done at the same sitting as diagnostic sialendoscopy and postoperative follow-up was conducted for a duration of six months.
In this study of 12 patients undergoing sialendoscopy, glandular swelling was a universal presenting symptom, with 80% patients exhibiting meal-stimulated exacerbation and post-massage relief. Submandibular involvement predominated (83%), with parotid cases comprising the remainder. All patients had sialoliths >6 mm and underwent combined approach sialendoscopy, yielding a 100% immediate symptomatic resolution rate. Recurrence occurred in 16%, successfully managed with repeat sialendoscopy.
As endoscopy is integral to otorhinolaryngology, sialendoscopy represents the evolution of minimally invasive salivary gland surgery. This study highlights the different methods of combined approach sialendoscopy in managing larger as well as distally placed sialoliths, thus reinforcing its role as a superior gland-preserving modality.
阻塞性涎腺疾病传统上采用保守治疗,手术仅用于难治性病例。这些手术,从乳头切开术到涎腺切除术,常常伴有多种并发症。在过去二十年中,涎腺内镜检查作为一种微创技术,因其优势取得了巨大进展。本研究旨在描述联合入路涎腺内镜检查作为一种微创选择治疗单独采用涎腺内镜检查难以处理的大型涎石病的疗效。
这是一项在三级医疗中心对12例患者进行的历时3.5年的前瞻性研究,所有同意的患者均接受联合入路涎腺内镜检查治疗。对患者进行了超声检查和计算机断层扫描。联合入路涎腺内镜检查的治疗干预与诊断性涎腺内镜检查在同一次就诊时进行,术后随访持续6个月。
在这项对12例接受涎腺内镜检查的患者的研究中,腺体肿胀是普遍存在的症状,80%的患者表现为进食刺激后加重、按摩后缓解。下颌下腺受累为主(83%),其余为腮腺病例。所有患者的涎石均大于6毫米,并接受了联合入路涎腺内镜检查,即刻症状缓解率达100%。复发率为16%,再次进行涎腺内镜检查成功处理。
由于内镜检查是耳鼻咽喉科不可或缺的一部分,涎腺内镜检查代表了微创涎腺手术的发展。本研究强调了联合入路涎腺内镜检查在处理较大及位于远端的涎石时的不同方法,从而强化了其作为一种优越的保留腺体方式的作用。