Jordan Karin, Jordan Berit, Burgt Jennifer Vanden, Jahn Franziska
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Ernst Von Bergmann Hospital, Potsdam, Germany.
Department of Hematology, Oncology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 24;33(7):622. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09638-9.
Most antiemetic studies have been conducted in patients with solid tumors receiving single-dose chemotherapy. A research gap leaves healthcare providers without clear guidance on effective antiemetic regimens and schedules for patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing high-dose multiday chemotherapy. This literature search identified antiemetic studies and assessed efficacy outcomes in the hematology setting, and specifically in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
A literature review of both PubMed and Embase was performed for published studies evaluating antiemetic regimens including an NK1 receptor antagonist (RA) and/or a 5HT-3RA with/without dexamethasone in the hematology setting. Key features of all studies are reviewed, and antiemetic efficacy is summarized specifically for studies in which patients received high-dose chemotherapy prior to HSCT.
Twenty-two of an initial 926 identified publications met the predefined inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogenous, with varying characteristics pertaining to randomization, control groups, size, cancer types, chemotherapies, antiemetics, and assessments, making cross-study comparisons and conclusions difficult. The range of response rates was wide with numerous studies showing complete response, no emesis or no nausea rates of less than 50%. Response rates were highest when an NK1 RA regimen was administered; however, an NK1 RA was underutilized and only administered in two-thirds of the studies.
The results reflect a significant clinical problem in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients with hematologic malignancies. The scarcity and heterogeneity of studies highlight challenges inherent in this area. This underscores a pressing need for rigorous randomized trials in hematology and HSCT assessing treatment-related CINV and effectiveness of antiemetic regimens.
大多数止吐研究是在接受单剂量化疗的实体瘤患者中进行的。存在的研究空白使医疗服务提供者在为接受大剂量多日化疗的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者制定有效的止吐方案和时间表时缺乏明确的指导。本次文献检索确定了止吐研究,并评估了血液学环境下,特别是在造血干细胞移植(HSCT)前接受大剂量化疗的患者中的疗效结果。
对PubMed和Embase进行文献综述,以查找在血液学环境中评估包括NK1受体拮抗剂(RA)和/或5HT-3RA联合/不联合地塞米松的止吐方案的已发表研究。对所有研究的关键特征进行综述,并特别总结在HSCT前接受大剂量化疗的患者的研究中的止吐疗效。
最初识别出的926篇出版物中有22篇符合预定义的纳入标准。这些研究具有异质性,在随机化、对照组、规模、癌症类型、化疗、止吐药和评估等方面具有不同特征,使得跨研究比较和得出结论变得困难。缓解率范围很广,许多研究显示完全缓解、无呕吐或无恶心率低于50%。当使用NK1 RA方案时缓解率最高;然而,NK1 RA的使用不足,仅在三分之二的研究中使用。
结果反映了在预防血液系统恶性肿瘤患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)方面存在的重大临床问题。研究的稀缺性和异质性凸显了该领域固有的挑战。这强调了迫切需要在血液学和HSCT领域进行严格的随机试验,以评估与治疗相关的CINV和止吐方案的有效性。