Suppr超能文献

与使用theta爆发刺激方案缓解疼痛相关的期望。一项系统综述。

Expectations related to the use of theta burst stimulation protocols for pain relief. A systematic review.

作者信息

Mussigmann Thibaut, Bardel Benjamin, Lefaucheur Jean-Pascal

机构信息

Univ Paris Est Creteil, UR 4391, ENT, Créteil, France.

Univ Paris Est Creteil, UR 4391, ENT, Créteil, France; AP-HP, Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2025 Aug;176:2110768. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110768. Epub 2025 May 25.

Abstract

Pain treatment by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the primary motor cortex (M1) is generally based on the conventional high-frequency (HF) paradigm. Newer theta-burst stimulation (TBS) paradigms are increasingly being used instead of HF-rTMS in various therapeutic applications, such as the treatment of depression. The literature was analyzed until January 2025 to appraise the analgesic effects of various TBS protocols (intermittent TBS, iTBS, continuous TBS, cTBS, and prolonged protocols, piTBS and pcTBS) in the context of experimental pain provoked in healthy subjects or chronic pain experienced by patients. In experimental pain (19 articles), analgesic effects were mainly produced by pcTBS of M1. Conversely, in chronic pain (19 articles), pain was rather relieved by iTBS of M1 used alone or for priming HF-rTMS. However, the data reported to date are too few to conclude on the interest of iTBS compared to HF-rTMS. Shorter iTBS sessions open up prospects for "accelerated" procedures, expected in the field of pain. However, it will be necessary to precisely control the stimulation parameters (e.g. the number of pulses delivered per session per day or the interval between sessions) and to evaluate their impact on cortical excitability and connectivity.

摘要

通过对初级运动皮层(M1)进行重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)来治疗疼痛,通常基于传统的高频(HF)模式。在各种治疗应用中,例如治疗抑郁症,更新的theta爆发刺激(TBS)模式越来越多地被用于替代HF-rTMS。对截至2025年1月的文献进行了分析,以评估各种TBS方案(间歇性TBS、iTBS、连续性TBS、cTBS以及延长方案,piTBS和pcTBS)在健康受试者诱发的实验性疼痛或患者经历的慢性疼痛背景下的镇痛效果。在实验性疼痛(19篇文章)中,镇痛效果主要由M1的pcTBS产生。相反,在慢性疼痛(19篇文章)中,单独使用M1的iTBS或用于启动HF-rTMS时,疼痛得到缓解。然而,迄今为止报道的数据太少,无法就iTBS与HF-rTMS相比的优势得出结论。较短的iTBS疗程为疼痛领域预期的“加速”程序开辟了前景。然而,有必要精确控制刺激参数(例如每天每次疗程输送的脉冲数或疗程之间的间隔),并评估它们对皮质兴奋性和连接性的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验