Jiang Liming, Wang Yifan, Ding Yuwu, Yang Kun, Zhang Zengqiao, Mani Ramakrishnan, Xia Jiayi, Ma Bitao, Wang Sizhong
Department of Rehabilitation, Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 9;15(9):e103925. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103925.
Although emerging evidence supports the short-term efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including repetitive TMS (rTMS) and theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TBS-TMS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for managing patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP), their clinical utility in managing CMP remains inconclusive. This uncertainty may arise from methodological limitations, including heterogeneity in treatment parameters such as stimulation targets and dosages. Additionally, safety profiles for these non-invasive brain stimulation interventions in patients with CMP remain insufficiently reported, with limited data on adverse events, cumulative risks and long-term safety outcomes. Hence, in this scoping review protocol, we aim to systematically (1) identify and map the stimulation targets and dosages of TMS and tDCS used in previous studies to treat patients with CMP; (2) summarise the rationale for using the stimulation targets and dosages of TMS and tDCS; and (3) summarise the reports on the safety of TMS and tDCS in managing patients with CMP, including whether safety was reported and how it was described.
We will adopt Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and report findings according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Two authors will independently screen articles and extract data from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase, including publications from inception to 1 August 2025. Discrepancies regarding study inclusion will be resolved through consultation with a third author. We will synthesise results using descriptive statistical methods.
This scoping review does not require ethical approval. The findings will be disseminated through presentation at national or international conferences and peer-reviewed publication.
Open Science Framework (Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8HFBZ).
尽管越来越多的证据支持经颅磁刺激(TMS),包括重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和theta爆发式经颅磁刺激(TBS-TMS),以及经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)在治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(CMP)患者方面的短期疗效,但其在管理CMP方面的临床实用性仍不确定。这种不确定性可能源于方法学上的局限性,包括治疗参数的异质性,如刺激靶点和剂量。此外,这些非侵入性脑刺激干预措施在CMP患者中的安全性报告仍然不足,关于不良事件、累积风险和长期安全结果的数据有限。因此,在本范围综述方案中,我们旨在系统地(1)识别并梳理先前研究中用于治疗CMP患者的TMS和tDCS的刺激靶点和剂量;(2)总结使用TMS和tDCS刺激靶点和剂量的理论依据;(3)总结关于TMS和tDCS在管理CMP患者时安全性的报告,包括是否报告了安全性以及如何描述安全性。
我们将采用Arksey和O'Malley的方法框架,并根据系统评价和Meta分析扩展的首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)报告研究结果。两名作者将独立筛选文章,并从PubMed、Scopus、科学网和Embase中提取数据,包括从创刊到2025年8月1日的出版物。关于研究纳入的分歧将通过与第三位作者协商解决。我们将使用描述性统计方法综合结果。
本范围综述无需伦理批准。研究结果将通过在国内或国际会议上展示以及同行评审发表进行传播。
开放科学框架(注册DOI:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8HFBZ)。