Jiang Haowen, Wong Jie Jun, Tan Ru-San, Gao Fei, Teo Louis Ly, Strom Jordan B, Lang Chim C, Koh Angela S
National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore; Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun 23;4(7):101889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101889.
BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiovascular (CV) diseases are increasingly frail but rarely represented in trials. Understanding effect modification by frailty on CV trials is critical as it could help define treatment strategies in frail patients. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aims to assess the implications of frailty on CV outcomes in clinical trials. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials examining the effects of frailty in the context of CV trials were included (CRD42024528279). Outcomes included a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause mortality, CV mortality, hospitalizations, and frailty-specific outcomes (physical, quality of life, and frailty scores). HRs and 95% CIs were pooled for clinical endpoints, and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated for frailty-specific outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty unique randomized controlled trials were included with a pooled total of 87,711 participants. Frail patients had a significantly increased risk of MACE (HR: 2.33 [95% CI: 1.87-2.91], P < 0.001, I = 83%), all-cause mortality (HR: 2.34 [95% CI: 1.80-3.05], P < 0.01, I = 75%), CV mortality (HR: 1.76 [95% CI: 1.60-1.93], P < 0.001, I = 0%), and hospitalizations (HR: 2.38 [95% CI: 1.65-3.43], P < 0.001, I = 92%) compared to nonfrail patients. In the frailest group, trial interventions decreased MACE (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.74-0.88], P < 0.001, I = 0%) and hospitalization (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.72-0.90], P < 0.001, I = 0%) risks with no significant difference in mortality risk (P > 0.05) compared with the control group. Trial interventions significantly improved physical (SMD: 0.15, 0.04-0.26) and quality of life (SMD: 0.15, 0.09-0.21) but not frailty scores (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: While frailty prognosticated a higher risk of CV events and mortality, frailty did not reduce treatment efficacy. CV trial interventions appear beneficial even in the frailest group.
背景:心血管(CV)疾病患者日益虚弱,但在试验中很少被纳入。了解虚弱对CV试验的效应修正至关重要,因为这有助于确定虚弱患者的治疗策略。 目的:本荟萃分析旨在评估虚弱对临床试验中CV结局的影响。 方法:纳入在CV试验背景下研究虚弱影响的随机对照试验(CRD42024528279)。结局包括主要不良心脏事件(MACE)、全因死亡率、CV死亡率、住院率以及特定于虚弱的结局(身体状况、生活质量和虚弱评分)的综合指标。对临床终点合并风险比(HR)和95%可信区间(CI),并对特定于虚弱的结局计算标准化均数差(SMD)。 结果:共纳入30项独特的随机对照试验,总计87711名参与者。与非虚弱患者相比,虚弱患者发生MACE(HR:2.33 [95% CI:1.87 - 2.91],P < 0.001,I² = 83%)、全因死亡率(HR:2.34 [95% CI:1.80 - 3.05],P < 0.01,I² = 75%)、CV死亡率(HR:1.76 [95% CI:1.60 - 1.93],P < 0.001,I² = 0%)和住院率(HR:2.38 [95% CI:1.65 - 3.43],P < 0.001,I² = 92%)的风险显著增加。在最虚弱的组中,与对照组相比,试验干预降低了MACE(HR:0.81 [95% CI:0.74 - 0.88],P < 0.001,I² = 0%)和住院率(HR:0.81 [95% CI:0.72 - 0.90],P < 0.001,I² = 0%)的风险,死亡率风险无显著差异(P > 0.05)。试验干预显著改善了身体状况(SMD:0.15,0.04 - 0.26)和生活质量(SMD:0.15,0.09 - 0.21),但未改善虚弱评分(P > 0.05)。 结论:虽然虚弱预示着更高的CV事件和死亡风险,但虚弱并未降低治疗效果。CV试验干预即使在最虚弱的组中似乎也是有益的。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-10-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-8-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-3-31
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-12-12
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-4-17
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-5-15
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-4-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-6-6
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024-10
J Gen Intern Med. 2024-6
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2023-12