• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衰弱状态改变了 ICD 治疗在 HF 患者一级预防中的疗效。

Frailty Status Modifies the Efficacy of ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention Among Patients With HF.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;12(4):757-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.009
PMID:37565972
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy is recommended to reduce mortality risk in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Frailty is common among patients with HFrEF and is associated with increased mortality risk. Whether the therapeutic efficacy of ICD is consistent among frail and nonfrail patients with HFrEF remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect modification of baseline frailty burden on ICD efficacy for primary prevention among participants of the SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial).

METHODS

Participants in SCD-HeFT with HFrEF randomized to ICD vs placebo were included. Baseline frailty was estimated using the Rockwood Frailty Index (FI), and participants were stratified into high (FI > median) vs low (FI ≤ median) frailty burden groups. Multivariable Cox models with multiplicative interaction terms (frailty × treatment arm) were constructed to evaluate whether baseline frailty status modified the treatment effect of ICD for all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The study included 1,676 participants (mean age: 59 ± 12 years, 23% women) with a median FI of 0.30 (IQR: 0.23-0.37) in the low frailty group and 0.54 (IQR: 0.47-0.60) in the high frailty group. In adjusted Cox models, baseline frailty status significantly modified the treatment effect of ICD therapy (P = 0.047). In separate stratified analysis by frailty status, ICD therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality among participants with low frailty burden (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.40-0.78) but not among those with high frailty burden (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.68-1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline frailty modified the efficacy of ICD therapy with a significant mortality benefit observed among participants with HFrEF and a low frailty burden but not among those with a high frailty burden.

摘要

背景

植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)治疗被推荐用于降低射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者的死亡率风险。虚弱是 HFrEF 患者中常见的现象,与死亡率风险增加相关。在 HFrEF 虚弱和非虚弱患者中,ICD 的治疗效果是否一致尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在评估基线虚弱负担对 SCD-HeFT(心力衰竭猝死试验)中 HFrEF 患者一级预防中 ICD 疗效的影响修饰作用。

方法

纳入 SCD-HeFT 中 HFrEF 患者随机分为 ICD 与安慰剂组。使用 Rockwood 虚弱指数(FI)评估基线虚弱情况,将患者分为高(FI>中位数)和低(FI≤中位数)虚弱负担组。构建多变量 Cox 模型,使用乘法交互项(虚弱×治疗臂)评估基线虚弱状态是否改变 ICD 对全因死亡率的治疗效果。

结果

该研究纳入了 1676 名参与者(平均年龄:59±12 岁,23%为女性),低虚弱组 FI 的中位数为 0.30(IQR:0.23-0.37),高虚弱组为 0.54(IQR:0.47-0.60)。在调整后的 Cox 模型中,基线虚弱状态显著改变了 ICD 治疗的效果(P=0.047)。按虚弱状态进行分层分析,ICD 治疗与低虚弱负担患者的全因死亡率降低相关(HR:0.56;95%CI:0.40-0.78),但与高虚弱负担患者无关(HR:0.86;95%CI:0.68-1.09)。

结论

基线虚弱状态修饰了 ICD 治疗的效果,在低虚弱负担的 HFrEF 患者中观察到显著的死亡率获益,但在高虚弱负担的患者中则没有。

相似文献

1
Frailty Status Modifies the Efficacy of ICD Therapy for Primary Prevention Among Patients With HF.衰弱状态改变了 ICD 治疗在 HF 患者一级预防中的疗效。
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Apr;12(4):757-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.06.009. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
Frailty Status Modifies the Efficacy of Exercise Training Among Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis From the HF-ACTION Trial.虚弱状态改变了射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭患者运动训练的疗效:HF-ACTION 试验的分析。
Circulation. 2022 Jul 12;146(2):80-90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.059983. Epub 2022 May 26.
3
Efficacy of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with diabetes and heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.植入式心脏复律除颤器在糖尿病伴射血分数降低心力衰竭患者中的疗效。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Aug;108(8):868-877. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01415-z. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
4
Association of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators With Survival in Patients With and Without Improved Ejection Fraction: Secondary Analysis of the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial.植入式心脏复律除颤器与射血分数改善和未改善的心力衰竭患者生存的相关性:心力衰竭猝死试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;2(7):767-774. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1413.
5
Predictors of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: impact of the predicted risk of sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality.射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者中一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器使用的预测因素:心脏性猝死和全因死亡率预测风险的影响
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jul;24(7):1212-1222. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2530. Epub 2022 May 22.
6
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction and diabetes.植入式心脏复律除颤器在射血分数降低和糖尿病的心力衰竭患者中的应用。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Jun;20(6):1031-1038. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1192. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
Use of the 6-min walk distance to identify variations in treatment benefits from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and amiodarone: results from the SCD-HeFT (Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial).使用 6 分钟步行距离来确定植入式心脏复律除颤器和胺碘酮治疗效果的差异:来自 SCD-HeFT(心力衰竭中的心脏性猝死试验)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 17;63(23):2560-2568. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.602. Epub 2014 Apr 9.
8
Association Between Comorbidities and Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients With and Without an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for Primary Prevention.植入式心脏复律除颤器用于一级预防的心力衰竭患者合并症与预后的关系
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Aug 6;4(8):e002061. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002061.
9
Long-Term Outcomes of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in the SCD-HeFT.SCD-HeFT 中植入式心脏复律除颤器治疗的长期结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 28;76(4):405-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.061.
10
Sacubitril/Valsartan and Sudden Cardiac Death According to Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Use and Heart Failure Cause: A PARADIGM-HF Analysis.沙库巴曲缬沙坦与心脏性猝死的关系:根据植入式心脏复律除颤器的使用和心力衰竭病因的分析:PARADIGM-HF 研究
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;8(10):844-855. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.06.015. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Timing for Primary Prevention for ICD in the Current Era of Pharmacotherapy.当前药物治疗时代植入式心律转复除颤器一级预防的时机
Card Fail Rev. 2025 Jun 25;11:e14. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2025.05. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of Frailty on Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.衰弱对心血管临床试验的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JACC Adv. 2025 Jun 23;4(7):101889. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101889.
3
Association of Frailty With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: A Prospective Cohort Study.
接受一级预防植入式心脏复律除颤器患者的衰弱与临床结局的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2025 Mar;30(2):e70061. doi: 10.1111/anec.70061.
4
Association between frailty and adverse outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏再同步治疗后衰弱与不良结局之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2025 Feb;16(1):165-177. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-01112-9. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
5
Assessing Frailty-Specific Treatment Effect in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review.评估心血管疾病中特定衰弱治疗效果:一项系统评价
Drugs Aging. 2024 Dec;41(12):945-958. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01157-2. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
6
Frailty, age, and treatment effect of surgical coronary revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy: a post hoc analysis of the STICHES trial.衰弱、年龄与缺血性心肌病外科冠状动脉血运重建的治疗效果:STICHES试验的事后分析
Geroscience. 2025 Apr;47(2):1945-1955. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01377-9. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
7
Frailty and Cardiovascular Health.虚弱与心血管健康。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Aug 6;13(15):e031736. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031736. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
8
Only the strong survive: The impact of frailty on patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation.适者生存:衰弱对接受无导线起搏器植入患者的影响。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jan 16;5(2):95-96. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.01.003. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Reply: How well can frailty predict no benefit from ICD therapy?回复:衰弱在多大程度上能够预测植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗无获益?
Clin Cardiol. 2024 Feb;47(2). doi: 10.1002/clc.24230.
10
The prevalence of frailty and its effect on the outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients.衰弱的流行率及其对心脏再同步治疗患者结局的影响。
Geroscience. 2024 Apr;46(2):2671-2679. doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-01023-w. Epub 2023 Dec 21.