Suppr超能文献

经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的系统评价

Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review.

作者信息

McCormack K, Wake B L, Fraser C, Vale L, Perez J, Grant A

机构信息

Health Services Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

出版信息

Hernia. 2005 May;9(2):109-14. doi: 10.1007/s10029-004-0309-3. Epub 2005 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The choice of approach to the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia is controversial. There is a scarcity of data comparing the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach with the laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach, and questions remain about their relative merits and risks.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched to identify reports of trials comparing laparoscopic TAPP with laparoscopic TEP. In addition, selected conference proceedings were hand-searched, websites consulted, reference lists of all included papers were scanned, and experts contacted for other potentially eligible reports. All published and unpublished randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing laparoscopic TAPP with laparoscopic TEP for inguinal hernia repair were eligible for inclusion. Large non-randomised prospective studies were also eligible for inclusion to provide further comparative evidence of complications and serious adverse events. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Statistical analyses were performed using the fixed effects model and the results expressed as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

The search identified one RCT which reported no statistically significant difference between TAPP and TEP when considering duration of operation, haematoma, length of stay, time to return to usual activities, and recurrence. The eight non-randomised studies suggest that TAPP is associated with higher rates of port-site hernias and visceral injuries whilst there appear to be more conversions with TEP. Vascular injuries and deep/mesh infections were rare and there was no obvious difference between the groups. No studies reporting economic evidence were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient data to allow conclusions to be drawn about the relative effectiveness of TEP compared with TAPP. Efforts should be made to start and complete adequately-powered randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which compare the different methods of laparoscopic repair.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的手术入路选择存在争议。比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)入路与腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)入路的数据较少,关于它们的相对优缺点和风险仍存在疑问。

方法

检索电子数据库以识别比较腹腔镜TAPP与腹腔镜TEP的试验报告。此外,人工检索了选定的会议论文集,查阅了网站,扫描了所有纳入论文的参考文献列表,并联系专家获取其他可能符合条件的报告。所有已发表和未发表的比较腹腔镜TAPP与腹腔镜TEP进行腹股沟疝修补的随机对照试验和半随机对照试验均符合纳入标准。大型非随机前瞻性研究也符合纳入标准,以提供关于并发症和严重不良事件的进一步比较证据。两名 reviewers 独立提取数据并评估研究质量。使用固定效应模型进行统计分析,结果以二分结局的相对风险(RR)和连续结局的加权均数差(WMD)表示,并带有95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

检索发现一项RCT,该研究报告在考虑手术持续时间、血肿、住院时间、恢复正常活动时间和复发率时,TAPP和TEP之间无统计学显著差异。八项非随机研究表明,TAPP与更高的穿刺孔疝和内脏损伤发生率相关,而TEP似乎有更多的中转情况。血管损伤和深部/补片感染很少见,两组之间没有明显差异。未发现报告经济证据的研究。

结论

尚无足够数据得出TEP与TAPP相对有效性的结论。应努力启动并完成有足够样本量的随机对照试验(RCT),比较腹腔镜修补的不同方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验