Bostian M L, Fish D L, Webb N B, Arey J J
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1985 Sep-Oct;68(5):876-80.
A collaborative study was conducted to compare automated methods for rapid determination of fat and moisture in meat and poultry products with the official AOAC solvent extraction and forced-air oven methods, respectively. Fourteen products were tested, with fat and moisture contents ranging from 2 to 43% and 44 to 74%, respectively. Eight of the collaborating laboratories analyzed the products by using a moisture/fat analyzer; 4 laboratories used the AOAC methods. Standard deviations for within-laboratory repeatability, between-laboratory reproducibility, and bias for each product indicated that the rapid methods were acceptable. The moisture/fat analyzer methods have been adopted official first action for fat and moisture analyses in meat and poultry products.
开展了一项合作研究,分别将用于快速测定肉类和禽肉产品中脂肪和水分的自动化方法与官方AOAC溶剂萃取法和强制通风烘箱法进行比较。共测试了14种产品,脂肪含量在2%至43%之间,水分含量在44%至74%之间。八个合作实验室使用水分/脂肪分析仪分析产品;四个实验室使用AOAC方法。每个产品的实验室内重复性、实验室间再现性的标准偏差以及偏差表明,这些快速方法是可接受的。水分/脂肪分析仪方法已被官方首次采用,用于肉类和禽肉产品的脂肪和水分分析。