Suppr超能文献

肉类中粗蛋白测定三种方法的比较:协同研究

Comparison of three methods for determination of crude protein in meat: collaborative study.

作者信息

Suhre F B, Corrao P A, Glover A, Malanoski A J

出版信息

J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1982 Nov;65(6):1339-45.

PMID:7174576
Abstract

A study was designed to compare the Kjel-Foss automated macro-Kjeldahl method and a block digestion-steam distillation method. The official AOAC Kjeldahl method was used as a reference procedure. Six products with a crude protein range of 10-30% were analyzed by 23 laboratories. Five laboratories analyzed the samples by the official AOAC method, 8 laboratories used the automated Kjel-Foss method, and 11 laboratories used the block digestion with steam distillation method. Standard deviations for each product and each method for both repeatability and reproducibility are given. The block digestion-steam distillation method has been adopted official first action.

摘要

设计了一项研究来比较凯耶尔-福斯自动常量凯氏定氮法和批量消化-蒸汽蒸馏法。官方AOAC凯氏定氮法用作参考程序。23个实验室对六种粗蛋白含量范围为10%-30%的产品进行了分析。五个实验室采用官方AOAC方法分析样品,八个实验室使用凯耶尔-福斯自动法,11个实验室使用批量消化与蒸汽蒸馏法。给出了每种产品以及每种方法的重复性和再现性的标准偏差。批量消化-蒸汽蒸馏法已被官方首次采用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验