• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公立医院薪酬制度改革是否提高了中国医生的薪酬?一项横断面研究。

Did the reform of the public hospitals' pay system increase the physicians' pay in China? A cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Zhao Yaxin, Zhou Zhongliang, Zhai Xiaohui, Liu Guanping, Wang Zhichao, Deng Qiwei

机构信息

College of Humanities and Social Development, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China.

School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;13:1555819. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1555819. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1555819
PMID:40556911
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12185482/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2017, the government initiated a pilot program for the public hospitals' pay system (RPHPS) aimed at enhancing physician compensation. We investigated the extent to which the reform impacted the physicians' pay and analyzed the factors that determine their pay.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study utilized China Public Hospitals' Compensation Reform Survey from 2017, which included a sample of 178,622 physicians. Total annual pay and annual performance-based pay were considered as the primary outcomes, while basic pay, allowance, and other forms of pay were classified as the secondary outcomes. We employed coarsened exact matching and hierarchical linear analysis to investigate the relationship between the RPHPS and pay, as well as the factors influencing pay.

RESULTS

The total annual pay and annual performance-based pay of physicians in the exposure group were significantly higher by 6.3% (coef: 0.06; < 0.01) and 19.2% (coef: 0.19; < 0.001), respectively, compared to the control group. We did not find a significant relationship between RPHPS and basic pay or allowances. Physicians' pay was associated with gender, age, educational status, professional titles, years of working, and departments. Male physicians received 4% higher total annual salary and 6% higher performance-based pay than their female counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Positive relationships were observed between the RPHPS and both the total annual pay and performance-based pay of physicians. Significant gender disparities were identified in total annual pay, performance-based pay, and allowances. The government should promote the RPHPS to enhance physicians' pay and implement initiatives aimed at achieving equal pay for equal work, irrespective of gender.

摘要

背景

2017年,政府启动了公立医院薪酬制度试点项目(RPHPS),旨在提高医生薪酬。我们调查了该改革对医生薪酬的影响程度,并分析了决定其薪酬的因素。

方法

这项横断面研究利用了2017年中国公立医院薪酬改革调查,样本包括178,622名医生。年度总薪酬和年度绩效薪酬被视为主要结果,而基本工资、津贴和其他形式的薪酬被归类为次要结果。我们采用粗化精确匹配和分层线性分析来研究RPHPS与薪酬之间的关系以及影响薪酬的因素。

结果

与对照组相比,暴露组医生的年度总薪酬和年度绩效薪酬分别显著高出6.3%(系数:0.06;<0.01)和19.2%(系数:0.19;<0.001)。我们未发现RPHPS与基本工资或津贴之间存在显著关系。医生的薪酬与性别、年龄、教育程度、职称、工作年限和科室有关。男性医生的年度总薪酬比女性医生高4%,绩效薪酬高6%。

结论

观察到RPHPS与医生的年度总薪酬和绩效薪酬之间存在正相关关系。在年度总薪酬、绩效薪酬和津贴方面发现了显著的性别差异。政府应推进RPHPS以提高医生薪酬,并实施旨在实现同工同酬、不分性别的举措。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f14/12185482/59f0c3aa8b28/fpubh-13-1555819-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f14/12185482/065e13834218/fpubh-13-1555819-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f14/12185482/ac27d908f335/fpubh-13-1555819-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f14/12185482/59f0c3aa8b28/fpubh-13-1555819-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f14/12185482/065e13834218/fpubh-13-1555819-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f14/12185482/ac27d908f335/fpubh-13-1555819-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f14/12185482/59f0c3aa8b28/fpubh-13-1555819-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Did the reform of the public hospitals' pay system increase the physicians' pay in China? A cross-sectional study.公立医院薪酬制度改革是否提高了中国医生的薪酬?一项横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;13:1555819. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1555819. eCollection 2025.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
4
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
7
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
8
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Magnetic resonance perfusion for differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas at first presentation.首次就诊时磁共振灌注成像用于鉴别低级别与高级别胶质瘤
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 22;1(1):CD011551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011551.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in Physician Compensation by Gender in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省医生薪酬的性别差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126107. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26107.
2
Factors that influence specialist physician preferences for fee-for-service and salary-based payment models: A qualitative study.影响专科医生对按服务收费和基于薪资支付模式偏好的因素:一项定性研究。
Health Policy. 2021 Apr;125(4):442-449. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.12.014. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
3
Assessment of the Contribution of the Work Relative Value Unit Scale to Differences in Physician Compensation Across Medical and Surgical Specialties.
评估工作相对价值单位量表对不同医学和外科专业医生薪酬差异的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):493-501. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0422.
4
Sex-Based Disparities in the Hourly Earnings of Surgeons in the Fee-for-Service System in Ontario, Canada.在加拿大安大略省按服务收费制度下,外科医生的每小时收入存在基于性别的差异。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Dec 1;154(12):1134-1142. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.3769.
5
Bridging the GP gap: nurse practitioners in China.弥合全科医生差距:中国的执业护士
Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1125-1127. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32209-3.
6
What explains wage differences between male and female Brazilian physicians? A cross-sectional nationwide study.是什么导致了巴西男女医生之间的工资差距?一项全国性的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 1;9(4):e023811. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023811.
7
Pay, workflow, and staff vacancies are most pressing issues, say hospital doctors.医院医生表示,薪酬、工作流程和员工空缺是最紧迫的问题。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 16;364:l246. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l246.
8
A survey of the tuberculosis physician workforce in the country of Georgia.格鲁吉亚全国结核医生劳动力调查。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018 Nov 1;22(11):1286-1292. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.18.0085.
9
The salary of physicians in Chinese public tertiary hospitals: a national cross-sectional and follow-up study.中国公立三级医院医生的薪酬:一项全国性横断面及随访研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 24;18(1):661. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3461-7.
10
Achieving Gender Equity in Physician Compensation and Career Advancement: A Position Paper of the American College of Physicians.实现医师薪酬和职业发展中的性别公平:美国医师学院立场文件。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 May 15;168(10):721-723. doi: 10.7326/M17-3438. Epub 2018 Apr 17.