Totaro Pasquale, Musto Martina, Tulumello Eduardo, Degani Antonella, Argano Vincenzo, Pelenghi Stefano
Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Foundation Hospital San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital P Giaccone, 90127 Palermo, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jun 12;12(6):222. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12060222.
Antegrade root cardioplegia remains the most popular strategy for myocardial protection during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross clamp. In patients with depressed left ventricular function, however, especially if associated with severe multiple coronary stenosis, increased pharmacological and/or mechanical support in the early post-CPB period is often required to support left ventricular recovery. In this study, we analyzed the results of a myocardial protection strategy that includes selective infusion of cardioplegia through each venous graft followed by warm reperfusion distal to each coronary anastomosis until complete removal of the aortic clamp (total antegrade cardioplegia infusion and warm reperfusion = TAWR) to improve early postoperative recovery in patients with depressed left ventricular function undergoing multi-vessel CABG. Out of 97 patients undergoing CABG using the TAWR strategy for myocardial protection, 32 patients presented with depressed left ventricle function (EF < 40%) and multi-vessel coronary diseases requiring ≥2 vein grafts and were enrolled as Group A. Combined primary outcomes and postoperative early and late left ventricle recovery (including spontaneous rhythm recovery, inotropic support and postoperative troponin release) were analyzed and compared with those of 32 matched patients operated on using standard antegrade root cardioplegia and limited warm reperfusion through LIMA graft (SAWR) enrolled as Group B. Two patient died in hospital (in-hospital mortality 3.1%) with no statistical differences between the two groups. In Group A 27 patients (90%) had spontaneous recovery of idiopathic rhythm compared to 17 (53%) in group B ( = 0.001). Early inotropic support was required in nine patients (28%) of group A and seventeen patients (53%) of group B ( = 0.041). Furthermore, in eight patients (25%) of group A and seventeen (53%) of group B ( = 0.039) inotropic support was continued for >48 h. : The TAWR strategy seems to significantly improve early postoperative cardiac recovery in patients with left ventricle depression undergoing multi-vessel CABG, when compared with SAWR strategy and could therefore be considered the strategy of choice in this subset of patients.
在体外循环(CPB)和主动脉交叉钳夹下行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)期间,顺行性根部心肌停搏仍然是心肌保护最常用的策略。然而,对于左心室功能低下的患者,尤其是合并严重多支冠状动脉狭窄时,在CPB术后早期往往需要增加药物和/或机械支持以促进左心室恢复。在本研究中,我们分析了一种心肌保护策略的结果,该策略包括通过每根静脉移植物选择性输注心肌停搏液,然后在每个冠状动脉吻合口远端进行温血再灌注直至完全解除主动脉钳夹(完全顺行性心肌停搏液输注和温血再灌注=TAWR),以改善接受多支血管CABG且左心室功能低下患者的术后早期恢复。在97例采用TAWR策略进行心肌保护的CABG患者中,32例患者存在左心室功能低下(射血分数<40%)且有多支血管冠状动脉疾病需要≥2根静脉移植物,被纳入A组。分析并比较了A组与32例采用标准顺行性根部心肌停搏和通过左内乳动脉移植物进行有限温血再灌注(SAWR)的匹配患者(纳入B组)的联合主要结局以及术后早期和晚期左心室恢复情况(包括自主心律恢复、血管活性药物支持和术后肌钙蛋白释放)。2例患者在医院死亡(院内死亡率3.1%),两组之间无统计学差异。A组27例患者(90%)实现了自主心律恢复,而B组为17例(53%)(P=0.001)。A组9例患者(28%)和B组17例患者(53%)需要早期血管活性药物支持(P=0.041)。此外,A组8例患者(25%)和B组17例患者(53%)的血管活性药物支持持续时间>48小时(P=0.039)。与SAWR策略相比,TAWR策略似乎能显著改善接受多支血管CABG且左心室功能低下患者的术后早期心脏恢复,因此可被视为该类患者的首选策略。