衡量家长对学校事务的参与度:一项系统综述。
Measuring Parental School Involvement: A Systematic Review.
作者信息
Mocho Helena, Martins Cátia, Dos Santos Rita, Ratinho Elias, Nunes Cristina
机构信息
University Research Center in Psychology (CUIP), University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.
出版信息
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 May 31;15(6):96. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15060096.
Parental school involvement (PSI) is a multidimensional construct that significantly influences children's academic adjustment and overall development. However, inconsistencies persist in its definition and measurement, with researchers operationalizing PSI through a varied of parental activities. This study aimed to (1) identify PSI instruments and their theoretical models and (2) evaluate their psychometric properties. Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO ID CRD42023451091, registered August 2023), this systematic review examined six databases (Web of Science, ERIC, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PsycArticles, and PsycInfo), analyzing quantitative studies from 2000 to 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed instruments designed for parents, teachers, or children aged 6-15 and published in peer-reviewed journals in English, Portuguese, Spanish, or French. From an initial pool of 490 records, 38 studies were included, yielding 43 instruments: 23 for parents, 15 for children, and 5 for teachers. Seven instruments followed Epstein's model, while nine followed the Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler framework, underscoring the prominence of these theoretical approaches. The study quality, assessed with MMAT, was generally moderate to high. Despite an exhaustive search effort, it is possible that some relevant instruments were not identified. Nevertheless, this review advances the understanding of PSI operationalization, promotes more consistent and replicable assessments, enhances alignment between instruments and study objectives, and strengths the validity of findings derived from these tools.
家长对学校的参与(PSI)是一个多维度的概念,对孩子的学业适应和整体发展有重大影响。然而,其定义和测量方法仍存在不一致之处,研究人员通过各种家长活动来实施PSI。本研究旨在(1)识别PSI工具及其理论模型,(2)评估其心理测量特性。遵循PRISMA指南(PROSPERO ID CRD42023451091,2023年8月注册),本系统综述检索了六个数据库(科学网、教育资源信息中心、医学期刊数据库、心理学与行为科学数据库、心理学文摘数据库和心理学信息数据库),分析了2000年至2024年的定量研究。纳入标准包括为家长、教师或6至15岁儿童设计的工具,并发表在英文、葡萄牙文、西班牙文或法文的同行评审期刊上。从最初的490条记录中,纳入了38项研究,得到43种工具:23种针对家长,15种针对儿童,5种针对教师。七种工具遵循爱泼斯坦模型,九种遵循胡佛-邓普西和桑德勒框架,突出了这些理论方法的重要性。用MMAT评估的研究质量总体为中等至高。尽管进行了详尽的检索,但仍有可能未识别出一些相关工具。尽管如此,本综述增进了对PSI实施的理解,促进了更一致和可重复的评估,加强了工具与研究目标之间的一致性,并增强了从这些工具得出的研究结果的有效性。