• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首发精神病青年患者亲属的心理教育:需求与经历的质性探索

Psychoeducation for Relatives of Young Adults with First-Episode Psychosis: A Qualitative Exploration of Needs and Experiences.

作者信息

Kuipers S A, Elzinga-Hut C A, Rosema B S, Sanches S, Boertien D, Stavenuiter B, Spoelstra S K, Pijnenborg G H M, Boonstra N

机构信息

Research Group Healthcare & Innovation in Psychiatry, Department of Healthcare, NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences, Rengerslaan 8-10, 8900 CG Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

University of Applied Science GGZ-VS, Catharijnesingel 56-1, 3511 GE Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):197. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060197.

DOI:10.3390/nursrep15060197
PMID:40559488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12195737/
Abstract

Although psychoeducation for relatives of individuals with a first episode psychosis is important for increasing understanding of psychosis, reducing relapse rates, decreasing hospitalization duration, and improving patient functionality, there is limited research on the specific experiences and needs of relatives of patients with a first episode psychosis. This study aims to explore the experiences and needs of relatives of young adults with first-episode psychosis regarding psychoeducation, with the goal of developing tailored psychoeducation (PE) that can be delivered by nurses. This qualitative study employed a descriptive, interpretative approach with a total sample of 23 participants, including semi-structured interviews (N = 16), two dyadic interviews (N = 4) and one triadic interview (N = 3). The dyadic interviews included two relatives and two patients, while the triadic interview involved two relatives and one patient. A topic list was utilized to guide the interviews. Thematic analysis was employed to analyse the data, supported by the use of ATLAS.ti. During data analysis, five key themes were identified as relevant for the development of a psychoeducational program: experiences with first-episode psychosis and psychoeducation, the content of PE (what), timing (when), exchanging experiences (how) and joint PE versus separate groups (which format). : This study highlights valuable insights and key components for an integrated psychoeducation program, focussing on the needs and experiences of relatives, for the development of the PE program. To optimize the benefits for both parties, future research should explore the potential of offering PE sessions that accommodate both individual and combined participant formats, allowing for a design tailored to the specific needs of the participants.

摘要

尽管对首发精神病患者的亲属进行心理教育对于增进对精神病的理解、降低复发率、缩短住院时间以及改善患者功能很重要,但关于首发精神病患者亲属的具体经历和需求的研究却很有限。本研究旨在探讨首次发作精神病的年轻成年人亲属在心理教育方面的经历和需求,目标是开发可由护士提供的量身定制的心理教育(PE)。这项定性研究采用了描述性、解释性方法,总样本为23名参与者,包括半结构化访谈(N = 16)、两次二元访谈(N = 4)和一次三元访谈(N = 3)。二元访谈包括两名亲属和两名患者,而三元访谈涉及两名亲属和一名患者。使用主题列表来指导访谈。采用主题分析法对数据进行分析,并借助ATLAS.ti软件。在数据分析过程中,确定了五个与心理教育项目开发相关的关键主题:首发精神病和心理教育的经历、PE的内容(是什么)、时机(何时)、交流经验(如何)以及联合PE与分组(哪种形式)。本研究突出了综合心理教育项目的宝贵见解和关键组成部分,重点关注亲属的需求和经历,以开发PE项目。为了使双方都能获得最大益处,未来的研究应探索提供同时兼顾个体和联合参与者形式的PE课程的潜力,以便设计出符合参与者特定需求的方案。

相似文献

1
Psychoeducation for Relatives of Young Adults with First-Episode Psychosis: A Qualitative Exploration of Needs and Experiences.首发精神病青年患者亲属的心理教育:需求与经历的质性探索
Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):197. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060197.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
8
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
10
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011004.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Participants.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2025 Jan 7;333(1):71-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.21972.
2
Psychotherapy focusing on dialogical and narrative perspectives: a systematic review from qualitative and mixed-methods studies.聚焦对话和叙事视角的心理治疗:来自定性和混合方法研究的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 6;15:1308131. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1308131. eCollection 2024.
3
Psychoeducation group facilitation training for nurses: A quality improvement project.护士心理教育小组促进培训:一项质量改进项目。
J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2024 Aug;37(3):e12476. doi: 10.1111/jcap.12476.
4
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
5
Effectiveness of Psychoeducation on Burden among Family Caregivers of Adults with Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.心理教育对精神分裂症成年患者家庭照顾者负担的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Nurs Res Pract. 2023 Sep 19;2023:2167096. doi: 10.1155/2023/2167096. eCollection 2023.
6
The Lived Experiences of Family Members and Carers of People with Psychosis: A Bottom-Up Review Co-Written by Experts by Experience and Academics.精神疾病患者的家属和照顾者的生活体验:由经验专家和学者共同撰写的自下而上的综述。
Psychopathology. 2023;56(5):371-382. doi: 10.1159/000528513. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
7
Psychoeducation for individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis: A scoping review.精神病学临床高危人群的心理教育:范围综述。
Schizophr Res. 2023 Feb;252:148-158. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
8
Peer supported Open Dialogue in the National Health Service: implementing and evaluating a new approach to Mental Health Care.同行支持的英国国民保健署开放对话:实施和评估一种新的精神卫生保健方法。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 22;22(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03731-7.
9
Family interventions for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.家庭干预预防精神分裂症复发的效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;9(3):211-221. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00437-5. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
10
Dyadic Interviews versus In-Depth Individual Interviews in Exploring Food Choices of Norwegian Older Adults: A Comparison of Two Qualitative Methods.在探究挪威老年人食物选择方面二元访谈与深入个体访谈的比较:两种定性方法的对比
Foods. 2021 May 26;10(6):1199. doi: 10.3390/foods10061199.