Suppr超能文献

应对护理工作中临床不文明行为的干预措施:一项系统综述

Interventions to Address Clinical Incivility in Nursing: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Lama Anne, Nwamu Henrietta, Kim Younglee

机构信息

Department of Nursing, California State University San Bernardino, 5500 University Parkway, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Rep. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):199. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15060199.

Abstract

Clinical incivility is a persistent issue in nursing education and practice, with negative impacts on students, educators, and clinicians. Uncivil behaviors-such as belittling, exclusion, and dismissiveness-compromise communication, teamwork, and patient safety. Although various interventions have been implemented, their effectiveness remains inconsistent. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions addressing clinical incivility in nursing and to identify common trends, gaps, and implications for future practice and research. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost (CINAHL) for peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 2014 and 2024. Search terms included "clinical incivility" and ("intervention" or "program" or "training") and "nursing". Studies were eligible if they evaluated interventions aimed at reducing incivility among nursing students, faculty, or practicing nurses. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed for intervention types, target populations, delivery methods, and outcomes. The review identified five main intervention types: educational modules (n = 9), cognitive rehearsal (n = 5), simulation and role-play (n = 5), team-based strategies (n = 3), and feedback/communication strategies (n = 2). Many studies used multiple strategies. Fourteen studies reported positive outcomes such as improved awareness, communication, and self-efficacy. Eight studies demonstrated statistically significant reductions in perceived incivility, particularly those with simulation-based, multi-session, or institutionally supported formats. Three studies showed limited or mixed results due to insufficient follow-up or lack of leadership engagement. Experiential and multi-component interventions appear effective in reducing clinical incivility. Long-term success requires leadership engagement, institutional support, and integration into ongoing professional development.

摘要

临床不文明行为是护理教育和实践中一个长期存在的问题,对学生、教育工作者和临床医生都有负面影响。不文明行为,如贬低、排斥和轻视,会损害沟通、团队合作和患者安全。尽管已经实施了各种干预措施,但其效果仍然不一致。本系统评价旨在评估解决护理中临床不文明行为的干预措施的有效性,并确定常见趋势、差距以及对未来实践和研究的启示。遵循PRISMA 2020指南,在PubMed、科学网和EBSCOhost(CINAHL)中对2014年至2024年发表的同行评审实证研究进行了系统检索。检索词包括“临床不文明行为”以及(“干预”或“项目”或“培训”)和“护理”。如果研究评估了旨在减少护理学生、教师或执业护士中不文明行为的干预措施,则该研究符合纳入标准。十七项研究符合纳入标准,并对干预类型、目标人群、实施方法和结果进行了分析。该评价确定了五种主要干预类型:教育模块(n = 9)、认知演练(n = 5)、模拟和角色扮演(n = 5)、基于团队的策略(n = 3)以及反馈/沟通策略(n = 2)。许多研究使用了多种策略。十四项研究报告了积极结果,如意识提高、沟通改善和自我效能感增强。八项研究表明,感知到的不文明行为在统计学上有显著减少,特别是那些采用基于模拟、多阶段或机构支持形式的研究。三项研究由于随访不足或缺乏领导层参与而显示出有限或混合的结果。体验式和多成分干预措施似乎在减少临床不文明行为方面有效。长期成功需要领导层参与、机构支持并融入持续的专业发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cc3/12195676/0af00337fe77/nursrep-15-00199-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验